Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #645144
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New version of my annotations to SRT |
| Date | 2024-02-15 19:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l37221F66goU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <def2f0bc24c77d1beb6fa90dd7b3a149@www.novabbs.com> <l338fdFgc98U1@mid.individual.net> <Bn9zN.8681436$ee1.4230449@fx16.ams4> <l35ntaFtdv4U1@mid.individual.net> <rKlzN.8682847$ee1.7408760@fx16.ams4> |
On 2024-02-15 10:32:23 +0000, Paul B. Andersen said: > Den 15.02.2024 07:10, skrev Thomas Heger: >>> Den 14.02.2024 08:34, skrev Thomas Heger: >>>> >>>> Einstein's variable names were EXTREMELY annoying! >>>> >>>> For instance: >>>> he had eight different uses of the letter 'A'. > > > In §1 the symbol 'A' is explicitly defined: "the point A of space", > and this is the only meaning of 'A' in §1 to and including §5. > > In §6 the symbol 'A' is not used. > > In §7 the symbol 'A' is explicitly defined: > "we call the amplitude of the electric or magnetic force A" > and this is the only meaning of 'A' in §7 to and including §10. > > The numbering of an equation (A) is not another use of the symbol 'A'. > > This is two well defined uses of the letter 'A' used to identify > a physical or mathematical entity. > > Can you name the other six? > > >> But both uses within a single text are wrong, because it is not >> possible to know, which particular meaning a symbol in an equation has, >> if both meanings use the same symbol. >> >> But Einstein gave this another kick and used the same symbol twice with >> different meanings within a single sentence. > > Can you quote the sentence in question? I once -- consciously and deliberately -- used the same symbol i with two meanings in the same equation, both as an index, as the ith of n observations, and as an inhibitor concentration. As both meanings were standard, and no one (except perhaps Thomas Heger, if he happened to read it) would be confused, I thought it best to keep the equation as it was. Nonetheless, I put a footnote saying what I was doing. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-15 07:10 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-02-15 11:32 +0100
Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-02-15 19:04 +0100
csiph-web