Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #640496

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT

Show all headers | View raw

Am 08.02.2024 um 15:51 schrieb Volney:
> On 2/8/2024 1:36 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>
>> I was actually a HYPOTHETICAL professor (in my role as writer of these
>> annotations).
>
> No, you weren't. You don't have the qualifications to be a professor,
> hypothetical or not. Self-awarded degrees/titles are worse than useless,
> they are signs of crackpottery.

I am actually allowed to write a critique of anything I like.

This is one of the rules of science.

It does not require any kind of qualification or any kind of title to 
critizise any theory you like, because any critique, from whereever it 
might come, is valid.

And unless such critique is rejected on scientific grounds, it remains 
valid.

You simply cannot dismiss an argument, because the one who wrote it has 
not the appropriate title.

But in case you like to disprove any of my annotations, you are welcome.

Simply download the file with my annotations (otherwise you can't read 
the annotations), select one of them you regard as faulty and write, 
what exactly is wrong with it.

>>
>> I found 428 errors in Einstein's text
>
> No, you did not.

Actually I did, because I wrote them all myself.

So: the content of all of these annotations are solely my own work.

If you find any error in them, it would would be nice, if you tell me 
where and what is wrong.

There are in fact a few still remaining, as I have already found a few 
myself.


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-02-10 08:18 +0100
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-02-10 10:44 +0200
  Re: New version of my annotations to SRT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-02-10 13:51 -0500

csiph-web