Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600781
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: climate change |
| Date | 2023-02-04 21:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k47secF4m80U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <k3p6prFqu29U1@mid.individual.net> <EKSdnXUEpZyhVUr-nZ2dnZfqlJxh4p2d@giganews.com> <1q5faea.g4cf1a12sjvbxN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <75f0d5a6-fbf0-45ef-b66b-db71385ddb75n@googlegroups.com> <50f32938-e441-47c9-92ae-82b738fd2fe3n@googlegroups.com> |
Am 04.02.2023 um 04:23 schrieb Paul Alsing: > On Friday, February 3, 2023 at 11:13:39 AM UTC-8, carl eto wrote: > >> Emitted heat (long wave infrared) has a broad frequency range. CO2 only absorbs in a very narrow 15 micron band part of this spectrum. The absorbed radiation is almost entirely passed kinetically to water vapors where it is re-radiated to space over a broad emission spectrum. > > This is not entirely correct. The absorbed radiation is re-radiated in every direction, including space *and* back towards the Earth... which is the whole problem to begin with! > Well, the main factor in weather is not reradiation of IR by rare gases like CO2. I would say, that CO2 is entirely irrelevant for weather, while clouds aren't. And from weather we can take averages and generate what (falsely) is called 'climate'. Such 'climate' will change upon human influeces, too, but not because of CO2. The main agent is water and mankind influeces water by e.g. cities, pollution and agriculture (and several others). It would be wise, if the problem called climate' is under consideration and means to solve the issue are investigated, that the main factor is kept in focus, while others like rare gases are kept in mind for later. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-26 16:40 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-27 08:17 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-27 14:31 -0500
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-28 14:08 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-30 07:35 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-30 07:38 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-31 09:34 +0100
Re: climate change nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-01-31 13:19 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 11:13 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-03 21:49 +0100
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 19:23 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-04 21:10 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 12:06 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:06 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-09 08:54 +0100
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 08:57 -0800
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 09:49 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 16:03 -0800
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 22:25 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 21:42 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:01 +0100
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:10 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:13 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:25 +0100
csiph-web