Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601181

Re: climate change

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 9:49:42 AM UTC-8, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 17:57:09 UTC+1, Paul Alsing wrote: 
> > On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 11:54:29 PM UTC-8, Thomas Heger wrote: 
> > > Am 06.02.2023 um 07:06 schrieb Paul Alsing: 
> > > 
> > > >> Well, the main factor in weather is not reradiation of IR by rare gases 
> > > >> like CO2. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> I would say, that CO2 is entirely irrelevant for weather, while clouds 
> > > >> aren't. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> And from weather we can take averages and generate what (falsely) is 
> > > >> called 'climate'. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Such 'climate' will change upon human influeces, too, but not because of 
> > > >> CO2. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> The main agent is water and mankind influeces water by e.g. cities, 
> > > >> pollution and agriculture (and several others). 
> > > >> 
> > > >> It would be wise, if the problem called 
> > > >> climate' is under consideration and means to solve the issue are 
> > > >> investigated, that the main factor is kept in focus, while others like 
> > > >> rare gases are kept in mind for later. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> TH 
> > > > 
> > > > You are really demonstrating here just how much about climate science that you simply do not know! You have a LOT to learn and your guesses are completely wrong. 
> > > If you call my statements wrong and ask me to read some textbooks, you 
> > > demonstrate, that you believe in what textbooks say and that textbooks 
> > > violate my description. 
> > > 
> > > I would say, that scientific content in textbooks had to be 
> > > scientifically correct, hence should not be in conflict to my 
> > > statements, which are based on simple logic. 
> > > 
> > > But if they are, as you wrote, this would be a serious problem for the 
> > > textbooks, because my own statements are based on simple logic, which 
> > > scientific textbooks of any kind should not violate. 
> > > 
> > > To demand acceptance of illogic scientific statements is something you 
> > > cannot possibly expect. 
> > > 
> > > TH 

> > Logic cannot compete with evidence. There are many theories in physics that defy logic. Relativity, for example.

> Oh, sure, physicists are such a band of idiots, 
> believing against the logic they have some 
> evidence.

Well Woz, evidence in science is defined as observations and/or experiments, both of which are repeatable by anyone with the desire and know-how to do so. Just because *you* are incapable of doing this does *not* invalidate those experiments and/or observations.

You, too, should read a dang textbook... there are answers there to whatever questions you might have.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 11:13 -0800
  Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-03 21:49 +0100
  Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 19:23 -0800
    Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-04 21:10 +0100
      Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 12:06 -0800
      Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:06 -0800
        Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-09 08:54 +0100
          Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 08:57 -0800
            Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 09:49 -0800
              Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 16:03 -0800
                Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 22:25 -0800
              Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 21:42 -0800
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:01 +0100
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:10 -0800
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-12 09:03 +0100
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:13 -0800
            Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:25 +0100
        Re: climate change Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2023-02-16 13:36 +0000

csiph-web