Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #587590

Re: ...all those Science guys

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: ...all those Science guys
Date	2022-06-26 21:10 +0200
Message-ID	<jhrp88Fpt9bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <1ptscyp.1fdbnswhmskclN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <jhfl0nFr835U1@mid.individual.net> <1pu1uui.1bctdyc1dm4h1kN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <jhq6p7Fi124U2@mid.individual.net> <t98q8e$3pqj0$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 26.06.2022 um 07:19 schrieb Volney:

>>>>>> And the Swiss Germans try to evade similarities to Germans in other
>>>>>> countries by creating a somehow different German.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a very strange idea.
>>>>> Actually Schwyzerdütsch and Alsatian and some southern German dialects
>>>>> are remnants of a lanuguage originally spoken in those regions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The modern German is an offspring of an old-German, which was a
>>>> language
>>>> widely spoken in Europe.
>>>
>>> For German values of 'widely'.
>>>
>>
>> Well, old German was seemingly widely spoke around the globe.
>
> You mean widely spoken around what is now Germany. You didn't mention
> whether you're discussing Old High German (Hochdeutsch) or old Low German.
>>
>> For instance there is a guy, who tries to prove, that the old
>> Maya-language was a form of old-German.
>
> And there is a guy (actually many of them) who thinks the earth is flat.
>
> Mayan (several variants) is in its own language group, and has about as
> much to do with old German as old German has with the Basque language.

https://www.die-welt-ist-im-wandel.de/Waren_die_Maya_Althochdeutsche.htm

I have justed quoted this guy:

https://www.amazon.de/Weltbildersch%C3%BCtterung-Die-richtige-Entzifferung-Hieroglyphenschriften/dp/3923997930

I cannot tell you very much about his theory, but apparently he 
believes, that Old-High-German was VERY widely spoken.


> If I remember, I'll ask my niece in a few days when I see her. She has a
> PhD is linguistics and knows at least the basics for just about any
> language on the planet off the top of her head. I'm sure she'll have a
> good laugh about that statement!

Good idea. I like to hear her comments, if possible.

TH

Thread

...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 22:37 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-09 23:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 23:58 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:05 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:11 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:18 -0700
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 10:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 11:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 11:19 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-12 09:37 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:38 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 11:17 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 18:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 18:43 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 09:52 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 20:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:16 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-19 07:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-19 08:16 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-20 07:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 06:58 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-21 15:13 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 11:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-22 06:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-23 08:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 20:07 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:48 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-26 01:19 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:38 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:10 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 03:12 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:22 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 09:42 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-25 08:49 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-10 14:35 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 15:55 +0200
      Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-10 09:05 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-15 11:24 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-15 11:35 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:00 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-11 06:37 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 12:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-12 07:45 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-11 17:37 -0400
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 15:48 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-13 13:04 -0400
          Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-14 08:23 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-14 11:03 -0400
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:28 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 20:27 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-15 12:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-15 12:04 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 07:59 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 08:04 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 18:54 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 00:42 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 15:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 08:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-17 08:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 00:18 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-13 11:45 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 13:08 +0200

csiph-web