Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586727

Re: ...all those Science guys

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: ...all those Science guys
Date	2022-06-10 11:08 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<62A38888.C17@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<62A2D8AE.24D8@ix.netcom.com> <312b56f8-c722-4a6e-9285-938936112112n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Richard Hertz wrote:
> 
> On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 2:36:53 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Most people are not aware...
> > (even among this very newsgroup)
> > that all those Science guys
> > who worked on
> > The Manhattan Project
> > *didn't* want to work on
> > The Manhattan Project.
> >
> > They had better things
> > to do than work for
> > Albert Einstein's project.
> >
> > Those science guys were
> > *forced* to work on
> > The Manhattan Project.
> >
> > Against their will.
> >
> > They were ...drafted.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> > the unchallengeable.
> 
> Not Oppenheimer, nor Teller and many others. They did it for ethnic and political reasons, looking for revenge (Teller, in particular).
> Oppenheimer had a very hard time when he lived for one year in Germany, with Born and others, learning QM.
> He had been at Cambridge before, where he poisoned a fellow student because he was better than he. His family saved him.
> 
> The only "conscience objector" of whom I'm aware of is Lawrence (the inventor of the synchrotron in 1932). He refused to work
> DIRECTLY at Los Alamos, making the bombs. But, still, he had to contribute to the war effort, so he was in charge of the distillation
> process. Same shit, one way or another.
> 
> You couldn't refuse to participate. As simple as that (or else...).


Oppenheimer? He was a communist. He passed atomic secrets to the Russian spies communists. He confessed he passed atomic secrests to the Russians.
It was Oppenheimer who gathered up all the commie scientists and were mandated to show up.

Here in this edited video, Richard Feynman said he was interrupted...
https://www.military.com/video/nuclear-bombs/nuclear-weapons/the-man-who-helped-make-the-atomic-bomb/1158173173001

(he looks scared even to talk about it...)

and there are other videos where he is angry and wants to get out but they wouldn't let him...

he knows he was conned into it by albert einstein.


Are you guys forgetting? I WROTE THE FUCKIN BOOK!!! 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7mAAhtUwAAzZbw?format=jpg&name=small








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 22:37 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-09 23:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 23:58 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:05 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:11 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:18 -0700
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 10:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 11:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 11:19 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-12 09:37 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:38 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 11:17 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 18:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 18:43 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 09:52 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 20:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:16 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-19 07:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-19 08:16 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-20 07:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 06:58 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-21 15:13 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 11:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-22 06:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-23 08:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 20:07 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:48 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-26 01:19 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:38 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:10 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 03:12 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:22 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 09:42 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-25 08:49 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-10 14:35 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 15:55 +0200
      Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-10 09:05 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-15 11:24 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-15 11:35 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:00 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-11 06:37 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 12:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-12 07:45 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-11 17:37 -0400
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 15:48 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-13 13:04 -0400
          Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-14 08:23 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-14 11:03 -0400
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:28 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 20:27 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-15 12:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-15 12:04 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 07:59 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 08:04 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 18:54 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 00:42 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 15:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 08:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-17 08:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 00:18 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-13 11:45 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 13:08 +0200

csiph-web