Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586786
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: ...all those Science guys |
| Date | 2022-06-11 15:48 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <62A51BD6.23FF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <62A2D8AE.24D8@ix.netcom.com> <jgikg2Fblm1U1@mid.individual.net> <t831t4$5oa$1@dont-email.me> |
Volney wrote: > > On 6/11/2022 12:37 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am 10.06.2022 um 07:37 schrieb The Starmaker: > >> Most people are not aware... > >> (even among this very newsgroup) > >> that all those Science guys > >> who worked on > >> The Manhattan Project > >> *didn't* want to work on > >> The Manhattan Project. > >> > >> They had better things > >> to do than work for > >> Albert Einstein's project. > >> > >> Those science guys were > >> *forced* to work on > >> The Manhattan Project. > >> > >> Against their will. > >> > >> They were ...drafted. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > The atomic bomb was most likely well known, before the Manhattan Project > > even started (most likely known by Einstein himself). > > > > The reason: > > > > the inventor of the atomic bomb Leo Szillard and Einstein have patented > > a 'fridge', which has only one known use in a fast breeding reactor. > > Totally absurd! > > First, this was patented in 1926, but the science behind breeder > reactors wasn't even known then. The neutron wasn't discovered until > 1932, atomic fission wasn't known until 1938, and plutonium in 1940. > How could something be created for a use which was entirely unknown at > the time of patenting? > > Secondly, it does have non-nuclear uses. It has been used to keep > vaccines cold in third world countries, as it only needs heat, no > electricity. It's also very much like propane refrigerators used in RVs > and "off the grid" people everywhere. > > Third, it uses liquid butane and dissolved ammonia in its operation, > which tells me that there is no way it could work at the high > temperatures of a nuclear reactor. > > You apparently got that crap from Starfarter, who also claimed that, and > also claims many incorrect bizarre claims about Einstein, and many other > things as well. You should be embarrassed for believing anything from > Starfarter. > > > > Therefore there was a need for such a device already in 1930 in Germany. > > Like what? Nobody knew of nuclear fission, neutrons or plutonium, much > less the combination of them known as a fast breeding reactor. Or any > nuclear reactor, for that matter. > > > > And the only known use of a fast breeding reactor is to produce Plutonium. > > Which was unknown in 1926, and unknown for the next 14 years. BTW > another use of fast breeders is to simply produce electricity/nuclear > power. In fact, ALL nuclear reactors do a little bit of breeding > (making U-238 in their fuel into plutonium, some of which powers the > reactor during the time before it needs refueling, and is one of the > dangerous components of spent fuel). > > > > And for this dangerous element we also have only a single known reason: > > atomic bombs. > > It can be used for power in nuclear power plants designed to burn it. In > fact, around 1992, Russia gave the US much of its ex-USSR plutonium so > that it could be used/destroyed in nuclear reactors so couldn't be used > in bombs. (now Putin wants it back :-) ) > > > > That's why we have to think about Mega-fraud in connection to the > > Manhattan project, too. > > What mega-fraud, and what does the Manhattan project have to do with a > fancy RV refrigerator? > > > > A 'good' reason for this project could have been, that all participants > > were sworn into secrecy, hence could not question the public narrative. > > You mean: "If any of us discovers or learns something of extreme > military significance 12 years from now, don't tell ANYONE! Pinky > Promise!!!" You speled Baloney wrong, it's Voloney! You are full of Voloney!!! You're not even wrong! Your first mistake when you said: "First, this was patented in 1926, but the science behind breeder reactors wasn't even known then." The patent was filed by Einstein in Dec 16, 1927 https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/53/e9/74/2cde176701fab8/US1781541.pdf Your second mistake was...when you said.."...but the science behind breeder reactors wasn't even known then." It was Albert Einstein who INVENTED the science behind breeder reactors! Since 1905, Albert Einstein drew a straight bee line to build his atomic bomb. His first patent, was https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D--B9FZU8AMnCvt?format=jpg&name=large https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 a nuclear reactor!!! This https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1 is this! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D--B9FZU8AMnCvt?format=jpg&name=large https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 22:37 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-09 23:44 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 23:58 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:05 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:08 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:11 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:18 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 10:44 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 11:08 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 11:19 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-12 09:37 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:38 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 11:17 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 18:06 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 18:43 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 09:52 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 20:38 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:16 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-19 07:36 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-19 08:16 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-20 07:44 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 06:58 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-21 15:13 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 11:36 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:30 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:29 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-22 06:44 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-23 08:36 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 20:07 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:48 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-26 01:19 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:38 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:10 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 03:12 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:22 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 09:42 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-25 08:49 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-10 14:35 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 15:55 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-10 09:05 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-15 11:24 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-15 11:35 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:00 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-11 06:37 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 12:12 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-12 07:45 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-11 17:37 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 15:48 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-13 13:04 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-14 08:23 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-14 11:03 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:28 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 20:27 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-15 12:29 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-15 12:04 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 07:59 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 08:04 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 18:54 -0400
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 00:42 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 15:06 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 08:30 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-17 08:38 +0200
Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 00:18 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:12 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-13 11:45 -0700
Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 13:08 +0200
csiph-web