Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #586946

Re: ...all those Science guys

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: ...all those Science guys
Date	2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<62A8C5FC.8E1@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<62A2D8AE.24D8@ix.netcom.com> <312b56f8-c722-4a6e-9285-938936112112n@googlegroups.com> <62A38888.C17@ix.netcom.com> <62A4DCB9.2FCE@ix.netcom.com> <1ptep78.1odjx1oj7do3N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>

Show all headers | View raw

J. J. Lodder wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard Hertz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 2:36:53 AM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > Most people are not aware...
> > > > > (even among this very newsgroup)
> > > > > that all those Science guys
> > > > > who worked on
> > > > > The Manhattan Project
> > > > > *didn't* want to work on
> > > > > The Manhattan Project.
> > > > >
> > > > > They had better things
> > > > > to do than work for
> > > > > Albert Einstein's project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Those science guys were
> > > > > *forced* to work on
> > > > > The Manhattan Project.
> > > > >
> > > > > Against their will.
> > > > >
> > > > > They were ...drafted.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > > the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > Not Oppenheimer, nor Teller and many others. They did it for ethnic
> > > > and political reasons, looking for revenge (Teller, in particular).
> > > > Oppenheimer had a very hard time when he lived for one year in
> > > > Germany, with Born and others, learning QM. He had been at Cambridge
> > > > before, where he poisoned a fellow student because he was better than
> > > > he. His family saved him.
> > > >
> > > > The only "conscience objector" of whom I'm aware of is Lawrence (the
> > > > inventor of the synchrotron in 1932). He refused to work DIRECTLY at
> > > > Los Alamos, making the bombs. But, still, he had to contribute to the
> > > > war effort, so he was in charge of the distillation process. Same
> > > > shit, one way or another.
> > > >
> > > > You couldn't refuse to participate. As simple as that (or else...).
> > >
> > > Oppenheimer? He was a communist. He passed atomic secrets to the Russian
> > > spies communists. He confessed he passed atomic secrests to the
> > > Russians. It was Oppenheimer who gathered up all the commie scientists
> > > and were mandated to show up.
> > >
> > > Here in this edited video, Richard Feynman said he was interrupted...
> > > https://www.military.com/video/nuclear-bombs/nuclear-weapons/the-man-who
> > > -helped-make-the-atomic-bomb/1158173173001
> > >
> > > (he looks scared even to talk about it...)
> > >
> > > and there are other videos where he is angry and wants to get out but
> > > they wouldn't let him...
> > >
> > > he knows he was conned into it by albert einstein.
> > >
> > > Are you guys forgetting? I WROTE THE FUCKIN BOOK!!!
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7mAAhtUwAAzZbw?format=jpg&name=small
> > >
> >
> >
> > Richard Feynman was also a communist according to eyewitness to the FBI.
> >
> > All these commies were passing atomic secrets to the Russians commies,
> > (including Albert Einstein who was the Master Spy Leader.)
> >
> >
> > The Russians eventually made am 'exact dupilicate' of our atomic bomb
> > down to the little screws.
> >
> >
> > It look like twins.
> 
> You are confusing two stories.
> The 'almost exact duplicate' was a B29 bomber,
> 
> Jan

The FBI showed drawings of the Russian atomic bomb to Oppenheimer, and
he said "WOW, IT LOOKS JUST LIKE OURS!!!! 






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-09 22:37 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-09 23:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-09 23:58 -0700
  Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:05 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:11 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 00:18 -0700
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 10:44 -0700
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-10 11:08 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 11:19 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-12 09:37 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:31 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-14 10:38 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 11:17 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 18:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 18:43 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 09:52 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-18 20:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-18 12:16 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-19 07:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Python <python@python.invalid> - 2022-06-19 08:16 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-20 07:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-21 06:58 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-21 22:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-21 15:13 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 11:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-25 20:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-22 06:44 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-23 08:36 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-24 20:07 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 06:48 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-26 01:19 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-25 22:38 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:10 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-26 11:22 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2022-06-26 03:12 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-26 21:22 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 09:42 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-25 08:49 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-10 14:35 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-10 15:55 +0200
      Re: ...all those Science guys patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-06-10 09:05 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-15 11:24 +0200
          Re: ...all those Science guys Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2022-06-15 11:35 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:00 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
  Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-11 06:37 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 12:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-12 07:45 +0200
    Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-11 17:37 -0400
      Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-11 15:48 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-13 13:04 -0400
          Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-14 08:23 +0200
            Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-14 11:03 -0400
              Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-14 10:28 -0700
              Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 20:27 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-15 12:29 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-15 12:04 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 07:59 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-16 08:04 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-17 18:54 -0400
                Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-18 00:42 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-18 15:06 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-16 12:26 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-16 08:30 -0700
                Re: ...all those Science guys Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-06-17 08:38 +0200
                Re: ...all those Science guys Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2022-06-17 00:18 -0700
            Re: ...all those Science guys The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-06-15 15:12 -0700
      Re: ...all those Science guys RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2022-06-13 11:45 -0700
        Re: ...all those Science guys nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-06-14 13:08 +0200

csiph-web