Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > de.sci.physik > #138606
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | de.sci.physik |
| Subject | Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever |
| Date | 2021-08-23 08:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ioguapFp5rhU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b08a46bf-2e82-21fc-e171-c206eb4a28c3@tb.tahina.fritz-fqdn.dd-dns.de> |
Am 23.07.2021 um 08:09 schrieb Fritz: > Eine klar verständliche Zusammenfassung des Standardmodells! > Als Schlusssätze auch alle offenen Fragen. > Dieses führt die Hirngespinste der hiesigen Crackpots/Cranks völlig ad > absurdum! > > Crackpots/Cranks - zuerst ansehen/anhören BEVOR hierconfs weiteren > Unsinn^42 schreiben! > > The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unl1jXFnzgo> > »The Standard Model of particle physics is the most successful > scientific theory of all time. It describes how everything in the > universe is made of 12 different types of matter particles, interacting > with three forces, all bound together by a rather special particle > called the Higgs boson. It’s the pinnacle of 400 years of science and > gives the correct answer to hundreds of thousands of experiments. In > this explainer, Cambridge University physicist David Tong recreates the > model, piece by piece, to provide some intuition for how the fundamental > building blocks of our universe fit together. At the end of the video, > he also points out what’s missing from the model and what work is left > to do in order to complete the Theory of Everything.« Die Idee, dass Materie aus Materie bestehen muss, ist Quark(-s)! Der Fehler liegt in der Idee der Elementarteilchen selber. Diese werden als materielle Objekte gedacht, weswegen man auf so einen Zirkelschluss kommt. Meiner Ansicht nach sind Teilchen nicht reale Objekte, sondern bezeichnet werden damit bestimmte Muster in einem Kontinuum, welche man häufig findet und die man deshalb für reale Dinge hält. Mein dazu alternativer Ansatz nennt sich 'structured spacetime'. (siehe hier: https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 ) Das Konzept ist zwar nicht so ganz einfach zu verstehen, aber funktioniert imho ganz gut. Als 'proof of concept' hatte ich gedacht 'Growing Earth' zu nehmen, da GE und das Standardmodell der QM sich widersprechen. Und GE meine ich belegen zu können. TH
Back to de.sci.physik | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-07-23 08:09 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever wernertrp <vintage1918@yahoo.de> - 2021-07-23 03:50 -0700
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-07-24 23:06 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever first last <klax@e.mail.de> - 2021-07-28 06:06 -0700
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-08-23 08:42 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-08-23 18:22 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-26 22:16 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-08-27 10:12 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-08-27 20:52 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-08-30 17:56 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-30 19:54 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-02 09:10 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-02 18:53 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-03 08:29 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-03 17:17 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-03 22:43 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-04 10:44 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-04 18:11 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-08 07:23 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-08 14:44 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-12 08:43 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-13 11:35 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-14 21:31 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Gernot Griese <ggriese@gmx.de> - 2021-09-14 22:36 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2021-09-15 05:09 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-15 05:59 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-15 09:28 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-15 08:59 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-15 10:52 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-15 13:13 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-16 08:35 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-16 10:04 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-16 10:11 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-16 20:58 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-17 08:52 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-17 11:47 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-18 07:46 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-18 15:45 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-19 09:32 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-19 11:27 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-19 11:59 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-20 07:12 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Carla Schneider <carla_sch@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-20 09:06 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-21 07:25 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-21 20:30 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-15 07:11 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-15 09:30 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Jean-Paul Tirnanog <jpt@sogetthis.com> - 2021-09-08 14:47 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-08 19:35 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-08 19:42 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Rolf Bombach <rolfnospambombach@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-16 20:59 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Sebastin Wolf <invaild@invaild.net> - 2021-09-16 21:07 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Alfred Kuehne <alfred@snake.de> - 2021-08-30 22:51 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-02 09:14 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Fritz - Till Eulenspiegel und Trollfuetterer <mogined@nurfuerspam.de> - 2021-09-02 18:54 +0200
Re: The Standard Model: The Most Successful Scientific Theory Ever Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2021-09-03 08:22 +0200
csiph-web