Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #670069
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.electronics.design, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: energy and mass |
| Date | 2026-03-18 00:27 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <69BA53EC.676@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (22 earlier) <10pauhm$2ldum$4@dont-email.me> <69B90D4A.CB1@ix.netcom.com> <10pbkvs$2u86c$2@dont-email.me> <69B990A7.1129@ix.netcom.com> <10pdas8$3h168$3@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Bill Sloman wrote: > > On 18/03/2026 4:34 am, The Starmaker wrote: > > Bill Sloman wrote: > >> > >> On 17/03/2026 7:14 pm, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> Bill Sloman wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 17/03/2026 2:55 am, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>> Bill Sloman wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 16/03/2026 3:42 pm, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 13/03/2026 8:24 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Am Donnerstag000012, 12.03.2026 um 12:29 schrieb Bill Sloman: > >>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> True. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and isn't worth the effort until you have lots of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> observations to make sense of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. Your naive positivism is playing up again. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best counterexample: general relativity. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't based on any observation. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, it was based on some madness of an > >>>>>>>>>>>>> insane crazy instead. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein was about as sane as anybody could be. > >>>>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I personally think, that Einstein was what I would call a > >>>>>>>>>>> 'disinformation agent'. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You are free to think that. I wouldn't go around telling other people > >>>>>>>>>> that you think that - it would suggest that you had a rather poor > >>>>>>>>>> grasp of reality > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Most likely he wasn't even a Jew and a Swiss from birth. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Lots of people were happy to claim him as being Jewish after he got > >>>>>>>>>> famous. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If Einstein wasn't actually a Jew, this would be a possible explanation > >>>>>>>>> for why he rejected the presidency of Israel, which was offered to him. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Would have been quite dangerous, if he had actually accepted and would > >>>>>>>>> been asked to prove his jewishness. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> A much more likely explanation is that he didn't fancy becoming some > >>>>>>>> kind of figurehead to be rolled out on ceremonial occasions. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It would have distracted him from the scientific work that he kept on > >>>>>>>> doing all his life. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Oh Yes, the scientific work that he kept on > >>>>>>> doing all his life was figuring out how to teleport a Navy war ship from > >>>>>>> one city to another city... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Einstein was working on...Quantum Teleportation. Called "The Einstein's > >>>>>>> Continuum of Spatio-Temporal" > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> "The Einstein's continuum of spatio-temporal which enabled idea of > >>>>>>> quantum teleportation, which represents technique of dematerialization > >>>>>>> of the matter, in one location and 'faxing', namely, electronic > >>>>>>> transmission to quantum state on the other > >>>>>>> location, in order to be materialized there." > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> (dematerialization in one location, and materialized on the other > >>>>>>> location). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Larry Niven described it better - as a science fiction author he had to. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Attributing it to Einstein seems to be pure invention. It didn't show up > >>>>>> in 1950's science fiction, and Einstein died in 1955. > >>>>>>> Put simply, it would get you from here to there... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You. or something that might look very like you. Transforming some 70kgm > >>>>>> of matter into energy and transforming it back to matter implies > >>>>>> transmitting great deal of energy. A hydrogen bomb transforms 0.7kgm of > >>>>>> mass into energy. Transforming the energy into exactly the right sort of > >>>>>> matter to exactly duplicate you might be tricky > >>>>> > >>>>> "exactly duplicate", or making a copy is not how it works. > >>>>> > >>>>> It is simply a 'cut and paste'. > >>>>> > >>>>> You cut it from and paste it there. > >>>>> > >>>>> Like on a computer.. > >>>>> you just highlight the whole folder with a blue light, then you, > >>>>> you...cut-and-paste it > >>>>> to your other hard drive and it reappears there! > >>>>> > >>>>> Not copy and paste, cut and paste. > >>>> > >>>> A distinction without meaning. "Cut and paste" is just "copy and paste" > >>>> followed by "delete the original". Somebody with a very tight memory > >>>> budget might cut, paste and delete in very small chunks. > >>>> > >>>>> You scan each atom > >>>>> delete it. and paste it there. > >>>> > >>>> Which would mean that there would be a point where you'd have half a > >>>> person at each end of the link, both dead, unless you could complete the > >>>> process in less than a millisecond. > >>>> > >>>>> spooky at a distance. > >>>>> > >>>>> Why do you think Einstein didn't finish it? > >>>> > >>>> Have you any evidence to suggest that Einstein even started on it? > >>> > >>> Yes, you gave us the evidence. > >>> > >>> You wrote: "It would have distracted him from the scientific work that > >>> he kept on doing all his life." > >>> > >>> > >>> You were referring to his Grand Unified Theory he was working on all his > >>> life. > >>> > >>> What do you think the Grand Unified Theory 'is'? > >> > >> It includes gravity as well as electromagnetism and the weak and strong > >> nuclear forces. > >> > >>> In 'science jargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other > >>> masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location > >>> of the displaced mass.' > >>> > >>> In other words... make a ship invisible and transport it to another > >>> place. > >> > >> No. > >> > >>> You scan the atom (all the atoms) of the ship, delete it, and paste it > >>> another place. > >> > >> Lovely if you could do it, but you probably need to invent a new > >> universe with new and different physical laws to make it possible > >> > >>> "The Office of Naval Research (ONR) has stated that the use of force > >>> fields to make a ship and her crew invisible does not conform to known > >>> physical laws. > >>> ONR also claims that Dr. Albert Einstein's Unified Field Theory was > >>> never completed. > >>> During 1943-1944, Einstein was a part-time consultant with the Navy's > >>> Bureau of Ordnance, undertaking theoretical research on explosives and > >>> explosions. " > >> > >> The Bureau of Ordance wanted a celebrity name to play with. > >> > >>> I think I have around somewhere a blackboard with all the math on it > >>> 'about getting from here to there' teleportation...celestial mechanics. > >>> > >>> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/2033817198998000030/photo/1 > >>> > >>> but it is not finished... > >> > >> Like a lot of other research projects. Mostly when you dig deep enough, > >> you find out that an idea is never going to work. If your success rate > >> is better than 30% you are going to get scooped by other researchers > >> uncomfortably often. > >> > >> Good ideas have a nasty habit of striking different people in different > >> places at much the same time. A friend ended up making $A12 million out > >> of an idea he patented. Tektronix had applied for a provisional patent > >> six weeks earlier, but abandoned it without spending the much larger > >> sums that would have been required to register an actual patent. > > > > It's also not science fiction as you claim to be...\\ > > It certainly is science fiction, which doesn't stop people having > half-baked ideas about using it in real life. > > > Using refined tools and long series of experiments, Anton Zeilinger started to use entangled quantum states. > > Among other things, his research group has demonstrated a phenomenon called quantum teleportation, which makes it possible to move a quantum state from one particle to one at a distance. > > > > https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=4ae20d8bd47daad1&hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ANbL-n4iBGManDUb2_O74J964ltj7MZlqg%3A1773767645872&q=nobel+prize+quantum+teleportati > > A quantum state doesn't have any mass. > > > The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger > > for their pioneering work on quantum entanglement, which laid the foundation for the field of quantum information science, including quantum teleportation. > > > > https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/press-release/#:~:text=Using%20refined%20tools%20and%20long,the%20Nobel%20Committee%20for%20Physics. > > > > and that 'blackboard' is Albert Einstein's promotion for...teleportation. > > > > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/2033817198998000030/photo/1 > > > 'beam me up, Scotty.' > > Since Scotty was always pixels on a screen, \it an illusion. > > > I notice you have a Scottish accent... > > Via my wife I hung out with quite a few dialect experts. My accent is > educated Australian, slightly soften by 22 years living in England. One > work colleague - with whom I'm still in contact - is Scottish, but I > don't seem to have picked up his accent. > > > are you slow? > > My surname is a west country surname - there are more pages of Slomans > in the Taunton telephone directory than in the London telephone > directory - and it is a contraction of Sloughman, who was some who > farmed bottom land close to a river. > > I'm not slow - both my parents had university degrees and I got a Ph.D. > All my nieces and nephews have been to university and graduated - one > now works for Google. My father's sister married a very clever vet, who > ended up with a D.Sc, and both their kids were professors at Adelaide > University for a bit. It isn't a high prestige school and both moved on > to better jobs. That is the clever branch of the family. My father's 25 > patents - I've only got three - instills a certain measure of humility. > > -- > Bill Sloman, Sydney Now I understand why teachers blow up in rocketships...the engineers don't understand physics. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-10 00:09 +1100
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 07:36 -0700
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 09:09 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-10 14:29 +1100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-10 14:17 +1100
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-10 21:21 +0100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-10 23:57 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-11 16:14 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 08:13 +0100
Re: energy and mass "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2026-03-11 13:50 +0100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 14:39 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 00:24 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 16:10 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 16:07 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 07:11 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 18:26 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 09:56 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 22:22 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 12:56 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-13 03:36 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 23:20 +0100
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-12 14:16 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-13 03:45 +1100
Re: energy and mass Ronnie Pantelakos <ina@snl.gr> - 2026-03-12 17:38 +0000
Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-12 22:12 +0100
Re: energy and mass Tathan Nagahama <gagngt@mmatata.jp> - 2026-03-12 22:11 +0000
Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-13 01:47 +0100
Re: energy and mass Cristobal Umehara <be@iu.jp> - 2026-03-13 16:50 +0000
Re: energy and mass Jairo Pantelakos <soaonjo@iai.gr> - 2026-03-14 13:21 +0000
Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 16:18 +0100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-14 20:46 +0100
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-14 16:59 -0700
GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 16:23 +0100
Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Brock Nakamura <cruan@bknkkror.jp> - 2026-03-14 15:39 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:31 +0100
Re: energy and mass Virgil Dömötör <rr@egi.hu> - 2026-03-14 17:43 +0000
Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Kyndal Zsoldos <odondo@ndzsda.hu> - 2026-03-14 15:52 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:37 +0100
Re: GPS Mikey Santiago <ime@ymsn.pt> - 2026-03-14 19:49 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 15:29 +0100
Re: GPS Frauly Christakos <acrahr@afrafs.gr> - 2026-03-15 14:37 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 19:17 +0100
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 19:22 +0100
Re: energy and mass Enmanuel Jacques <cucus@mulneam.fr> - 2026-03-15 20:00 +0000
GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 22:40 +0100
Re: GPS Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-15 23:06 +0100
Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Nestor Rooijakkers <skk@ereno.nl> - 2026-03-16 14:15 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 15:37 +0100
Re: GPS Bernie Gonzalez <inzbi@rol.es> - 2026-03-16 17:13 +0000
Re: energy and mass athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-16 11:27 +0000
Re: energy and mass Shay Hofwegen <gwg@eewyow.nl> - 2026-03-16 17:25 +0000
Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-15 08:08 -0700
Re: GPS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-16 10:16 +0100
Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 05:26 -0700
Re: GPS Leopold Bicchieri <deo@rehi.it> - 2026-03-16 14:26 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:16 +0100
Re: GPS Lowen Missiakos <osmi@wlss.gr> - 2026-03-14 17:49 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 19:44 +0100
Re: GPS Ridge Górski <kgie@gigg.pl> - 2026-03-14 19:39 +0000
Re: GPS Krinden Hoffmann <efne@roeaa.de> - 2026-03-15 14:44 +0000
GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 01:20 +0100
GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 01:22 +0100
Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Jovanni Rodrigues <iav@ignj.pt> - 2026-03-16 14:00 +0000
Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 15:26 +0100
Re: GPS Webster Schuchardt <tcbr@tteue.de> - 2026-03-16 14:33 +0000
Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 07:54 -0700
Re: GPS Hever Ramires <ihme@aermr.pt> - 2026-03-16 17:09 +0000
Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 11:08 -0700
Re: GPS Kile Karolina <oeelka@aili.net> - 2026-03-17 18:05 +0000
Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 14:44 -0700
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-12 21:58 +0100
Re: energy and mass Donel Profeta <aadeafe@nefe.it> - 2026-03-15 15:17 +0000
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-11 18:45 +0100
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-11 11:20 +0100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-12 10:35 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 22:29 +1100
Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-13 10:24 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-14 03:42 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-15 21:42 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-16 21:50 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-16 08:55 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-17 18:06 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 01:14 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 00:29 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 10:34 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 15:49 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 00:27 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 21:00 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 11:07 -0700
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 11:47 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 15:14 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 07:47 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 18:11 +1100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 15:07 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 23:07 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 18:24 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 09:31 +0100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 20:38 +1100
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-19 11:54 -0700
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-20 11:59 -0700
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-20 15:28 -0700
Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-22 12:12 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-23 23:05 +1100
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-21 16:23 +1100
Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 07:47 +0100
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 07:32 -0700
Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-11 15:56 +1100
Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-11 11:20 +0100
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 10:59 -0700
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 11:41 -0700
Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-09 13:18 -0700
csiph-web