Re: energy and mass

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.electronics.design, sci.math
Subject	Re: energy and mass
Date	2026-03-18 11:47 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<69BAF327.200C@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(24 earlier) <69B990A7.1129@ix.netcom.com> <10pdas8$3h168$3@dont-email.me> <69BA53EC.676@ix.netcom.com> <10pdt44$3n2fa$3@dont-email.me> <69BAE9E5.712@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Bill Sloman wrote:
> >
> > On 18/03/2026 6:27 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Bill Sloman wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 18/03/2026 4:34 am, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>> Bill Sloman wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 17/03/2026 7:14 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 17/03/2026 2:55 am, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 16/03/2026 3:42 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Bill Sloman wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 13/03/2026 8:24 pm, Thomas Heger wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Am Donnerstag000012, 12.03.2026 um 12:29 schrieb Bill Sloman:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and isn't worth the effort until you have lots of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> observations to make sense of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense. Your naive positivism is playing up again.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best counterexample: general relativity.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't based on any observation.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, it was based on some madness of an
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> insane crazy instead.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein was about as sane as anybody could be.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally think, that Einstein was what I would call a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'disinformation agent'.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You are free to think that. I wouldn't go around telling other people
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that you think that - it would suggest that you had a rather poor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> grasp of reality
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely he wasn't even a Jew and a Swiss from birth.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Lots of people were happy to claim him as being Jewish after he got
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> famous.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> If Einstein wasn't actually a Jew, this would be a possible explanation
> > >>>>>>>>>>> for why he rejected the presidency of Israel, which was offered to him.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Would have been quite dangerous, if he had actually accepted and would
> > >>>>>>>>>>> been asked to prove his jewishness.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> A much more likely explanation is that he didn't fancy becoming some
> > >>>>>>>>>> kind of figurehead to be rolled out on ceremonial occasions.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> It would have distracted him from the scientific work that he kept on
> > >>>>>>>>>> doing all his life.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Oh Yes, the  scientific work that he kept on
> > >>>>>>>>> doing all his life was figuring out how to teleport a Navy war ship from
> > >>>>>>>>> one city to another city...
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Einstein was working on...Quantum Teleportation. Called "The Einstein's
> > >>>>>>>>> Continuum of Spatio-Temporal"
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> "The Einstein's continuum of spatio-temporal which enabled idea of
> > >>>>>>>>> quantum teleportation, which represents technique of dematerialization
> > >>>>>>>>> of the matter, in one location and 'faxing', namely, electronic
> > >>>>>>>>> transmission to quantum state on the other
> > >>>>>>>>> location, in order to be materialized there."
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> (dematerialization in one location, and materialized on the other
> > >>>>>>>>> location).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Larry Niven described it better - as a science fiction author he had to.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Attributing it to Einstein seems to be pure invention. It didn't show up
> > >>>>>>>> in 1950's science fiction, and Einstein died in 1955.
> > >>>>>>>>> Put simply, it would get you from here to there...
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> You. or something that might look very like you. Transforming some 70kgm
> > >>>>>>>> of matter into energy and transforming it back to matter implies
> > >>>>>>>> transmitting great deal of energy. A hydrogen bomb transforms 0.7kgm of
> > >>>>>>>> mass into energy. Transforming the energy into exactly the right sort of
> > >>>>>>>> matter to exactly duplicate you might be tricky
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> "exactly duplicate", or making a copy is not how it works.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> It is simply a 'cut and paste'.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> You cut it from and paste it there.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Like on a computer..
> > >>>>>>> you just highlight the whole folder with a blue light, then you,
> > >>>>>>> you...cut-and-paste it
> > >>>>>>> to your other hard drive and it reappears there!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Not copy and paste, cut and paste.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> A distinction without meaning. "Cut and paste" is just "copy and paste"
> > >>>>>> followed by "delete the original". Somebody with a very tight memory
> > >>>>>> budget might cut, paste and delete in very small chunks.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> You scan each atom
> > >>>>>>> delete it. and paste it there.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Which would mean that there would be a point where you'd have half a
> > >>>>>> person at each end of the link, both dead, unless you could complete the
> > >>>>>> process in less than a millisecond.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> spooky at a distance.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Why do you think Einstein didn't finish it?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Have you any evidence to suggest that Einstein even started on it?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yes, you gave us the evidence.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You wrote: "It would have distracted him from the scientific work that
> > >>>>> he kept on doing all his life."
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You were referring to his Grand Unified Theory he was working on all his
> > >>>>> life.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> What do you think  the Grand Unified Theory 'is'?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It includes gravity as well as electromagnetism and the weak and strong
> > >>>> nuclear forces.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> In 'science jargon' it's: 'When a mass moves, the force acting on other
> > >>>>> masses had been considered to adjust instantaneously to the new location
> > >>>>> of the displaced mass.'
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In other words... make a ship invisible and transport it to another
> > >>>>> place.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> No.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> You scan the atom (all the atoms) of the ship, delete it, and paste it
> > >>>>> another place.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Lovely if you could do it, but you probably need to invent a new
> > >>>> universe with new and different physical laws to make it possible
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> "The Office of Naval Research (ONR) has stated that the use of force
> > >>>>> fields to make a ship and her crew invisible does not conform to known
> > >>>>> physical laws.
> > >>>>> ONR also claims that Dr. Albert Einstein's Unified Field Theory was
> > >>>>> never completed.
> > >>>>> During 1943-1944, Einstein was a part-time consultant with the Navy's
> > >>>>> Bureau of Ordnance, undertaking theoretical research on explosives and
> > >>>>> explosions. "
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Bureau of Ordance wanted a celebrity name to play with.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I think I have around somewhere a blackboard with all the math on it
> > >>>>> 'about getting from here to there' teleportation...celestial mechanics.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/2033817198998000030/photo/1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> but it is not finished...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Like a lot of other research projects. Mostly when you dig deep enough,
> > >>>> you find out that an idea is never going to work. If your success rate
> > >>>> is better than 30% you are going to get scooped by other researchers
> > >>>> uncomfortably often.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Good ideas have a nasty habit of striking different people in different
> > >>>> places at much the same time. A friend ended up making $A12 million out
> > >>>> of an idea he patented. Tektronix had applied for a provisional patent
> > >>>> six weeks earlier, but abandoned it without spending the much larger
> > >>>> sums that would have been required to register an actual patent.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's also not science fiction as you claim to be...\\
> > >>
> > >> It certainly is science fiction, which doesn't stop people having
> > >> half-baked ideas about using it in real life.
> > >>
> > >>> Using refined tools and long series of experiments, Anton Zeilinger started to use entangled quantum states.
> > >>> Among other things, his research group has demonstrated a phenomenon called quantum teleportation, which makes it possible to move a quantum state from one particle to one at a distance.
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=4ae20d8bd47daad1&hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ANbL-n4iBGManDUb2_O74J964ltj7MZlqg%3A1773767645872&q=nobel+prize+quantum+telepor
> > >>
> > >> A quantum state doesn't have any mass.
> > >>
> > >>> The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser, and Anton Zeilinger
> > >>> for their pioneering work on quantum entanglement, which laid the foundation for the field of quantum information science, including quantum teleportation.
> > >>>
> > >>> https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/press-release/#:~:text=Using%20refined%20tools%20and%20long,the%20Nobel%20Committee%20for%20Physics.
> > >>>
> > >>> and that 'blackboard' is Albert Einstein's promotion for...teleportation.
> > >>>
> > >>> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/2033817198998000030/photo/1 >
> > >>> 'beam me up, Scotty.'
> > >>
> > >> Since Scotty was always pixels on a screen, \it an illusion.
> > >>
> > >>> I notice you have a Scottish accent...
> > >>
> > >> Via my wife I hung out with quite a few dialect experts. My accent is
> > >> educated Australian, slightly soften by 22 years living in England. One
> > >> work colleague - with whom I'm still in contact - is Scottish, but I
> > >> don't seem to have picked up his accent.
> > >>
> > >>> are you slow?
> > >>
> > >> My surname is a west country surname - there are more pages of Slomans
> > >> in the Taunton telephone directory than in the London telephone
> > >> directory - and it is a contraction of Sloughman, who was some who
> > >> farmed bottom land close to a river.
> > >>
> > >> I'm not slow - both my parents had university degrees and I got a Ph.D.
> > >> All my nieces and nephews have been to university and graduated - one
> > >> now works for Google. My father's sister married a very clever vet, who
> > >> ended up with a D.Sc, and both their kids were professors at Adelaide
> > >> University for a bit. It isn't a high prestige school and both moved on
> > >> to better jobs. That is the clever branch of the family. My father's 25
> > >> patents - I've only got three - instills a certain measure of humility.
> 
> From slow +? man, a nickname for a sluggish person.
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Sloman
> 
> > >
> > > Now I understand why teachers blow up in rocketships...the engineers
> > > don't understand physics.
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
> 
> >
> > The engineers has warned management, "but neither NASA nor the SRB
> > manufacturer Morton Thiokol had addressed this known defect. NASA
> > managers also disregarded engineers' warnings about the dangers of
> > launching in low temperatures and did not report these technical
> > concerns to their superiors."
> >
> > It was a management screw up. The engineers had done their jobs and
> > warned management, but management ignored them. It happens a lot.
> >
> 
> "It happens a lot."???? You mean, you look the other way.
> 
> then you take bets in the bathroom, will she live or die?
> 
> I can bet on that today, can I? Kalshi.
> 
> no more bathroom bets.
> 
> I bet she dies...I seen the engineers...too weak.
> 
> You know, no one ever told the teacher what were the odds...


Let's call it what it is, the engineers are guilty of negligent MURDER.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-11 16:14 +1100
  Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 08:13 +0100
    Re: energy and mass "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2026-03-11 13:50 +0100
      Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 14:39 +0100
    Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 00:24 +1100
      Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-11 16:10 +0100
        Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 16:07 +1100
          Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 07:11 +0100
            Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 18:26 +1100
              Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 09:56 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 22:22 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 12:56 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-13 03:36 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-12 23:20 +0100
                Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-12 14:16 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-13 03:45 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Ronnie Pantelakos <ina@snl.gr> - 2026-03-12 17:38 +0000
                Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-12 22:12 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Tathan Nagahama <gagngt@mmatata.jp> - 2026-03-12 22:11 +0000
                Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-13 01:47 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Cristobal Umehara <be@iu.jp> - 2026-03-13 16:50 +0000
                Re: energy and mass Jairo Pantelakos <soaonjo@iai.gr> - 2026-03-14 13:21 +0000
                Re: energy and mass Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 16:18 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-14 20:46 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-14 16:59 -0700
                GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 16:23 +0100
                Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Brock Nakamura <cruan@bknkkror.jp> - 2026-03-14 15:39 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:31 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Virgil Dömötör <rr@egi.hu> - 2026-03-14 17:43 +0000
                Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Kyndal Zsoldos <odondo@ndzsda.hu> - 2026-03-14 15:52 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:37 +0100
                Re: GPS Mikey Santiago <ime@ymsn.pt> - 2026-03-14 19:49 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 15:29 +0100
                Re: GPS Frauly Christakos <acrahr@afrafs.gr> - 2026-03-15 14:37 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 19:17 +0100
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 19:22 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Enmanuel Jacques <cucus@mulneam.fr> - 2026-03-15 20:00 +0000
                GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-15 22:40 +0100
                Re: GPS Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-15 23:06 +0100
                Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Nestor Rooijakkers <skk@ereno.nl> - 2026-03-16 14:15 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 15:37 +0100
                Re: GPS Bernie Gonzalez <inzbi@rol.es> - 2026-03-16 17:13 +0000
                Re: energy and mass athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-03-16 11:27 +0000
                Re: energy and mass Shay Hofwegen <gwg@eewyow.nl> - 2026-03-16 17:25 +0000
                Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-15 08:08 -0700
                Re: GPS Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-16 10:16 +0100
                Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 05:26 -0700
                Re: GPS Leopold Bicchieri <deo@rehi.it> - 2026-03-16 14:26 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 18:16 +0100
                Re: GPS Lowen Missiakos <osmi@wlss.gr> - 2026-03-14 17:49 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-14 19:44 +0100
                Re: GPS Ridge Górski <kgie@gigg.pl> - 2026-03-14 19:39 +0000
                Re: GPS Krinden Hoffmann <efne@roeaa.de> - 2026-03-15 14:44 +0000
                GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 01:20 +0100
                GPS (was: energy and mass) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 01:22 +0100
                Re: GPS (was: energy and mass) Jovanni Rodrigues <iav@ignj.pt> - 2026-03-16 14:00 +0000
                Re: GPS Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2026-03-16 15:26 +0100
                Re: GPS Webster Schuchardt <tcbr@tteue.de> - 2026-03-16 14:33 +0000
                Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 07:54 -0700
                Re: GPS Hever Ramires <ihme@aermr.pt> - 2026-03-16 17:09 +0000
                Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-16 11:08 -0700
                Re: GPS Kile Karolina <oeelka@aili.net> - 2026-03-17 18:05 +0000
                Re: GPS Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-17 14:44 -0700
                Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-12 21:58 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Donel Profeta <aadeafe@nefe.it> - 2026-03-15 15:17 +0000
      Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-11 18:45 +0100
  Re: energy and mass nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-03-11 11:20 +0100
  Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-12 10:35 +0100
    Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-12 22:29 +1100
      Re: energy and mass Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-03-13 10:24 +0100
        Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-14 03:42 +1100
          Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-15 21:42 -0700
            Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-16 21:50 +1100
              Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-16 08:55 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-17 18:06 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 01:14 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 00:29 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-17 10:34 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 15:49 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 00:27 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-18 21:00 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 11:07 -0700
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 11:47 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 15:14 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 07:47 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 18:11 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 15:07 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-18 23:07 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 18:24 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 09:31 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-19 20:38 +1100
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-19 11:54 -0700
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-20 11:59 -0700
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-20 15:28 -0700
                Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-03-22 12:12 -0700
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-23 23:05 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-21 16:23 +1100
                Re: energy and mass Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-03-19 07:47 +0100
                Re: energy and mass Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-18 07:32 -0700

csiph-web