Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.logic > #345729

Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail

From Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups sci.logic
Subject Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail
Date 2026-04-29 10:42 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10sscpf$3o7dr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (26 earlier) <10slp9g$1qrss$1@dont-email.me> <10snc9t$2960v$1@dont-email.me> <10snd81$29fi5$1@dont-email.me> <10spqos$30e9k$1@dont-email.me> <10sqc2g$35ug9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 28/04/2026 16:18, WM wrote:
> Am 28.04.2026 um 10:22 schrieb Mikko:
>> On 27/04/2026 13:19, WM wrote:
> 
>>>>> Yes. But we can invent a pre-root-node and choose one path which 
>>>>> this the pre-root-node is mapped to:
>>>>
>>>>>   o
>>>>>   |
>>>>>   o
>>>>> / \
>>>>
>>>> That pre-root node is not a part of the tree and not useful. And if
>>>> you don't actually choose a path then your claim that you could
>>>> choose is not credible.
>>>
>>> Choose any path you like that passes the node. Never you will 
>>> distinguish more paths than nodes.
>>
>> I have already shown that it is possible to find two sets of paths
>> so that no path is in both sets and every node is in at least one
>> path in each set.

> You have failed. To cover every node of RRR... by paths going left after 
> some node is as possible as to add even numbers with an odd result.

We already know that you can lie. No forther proof necessary.

There are infinitely many paths to every node of RRR. Infinitely many
of those paths are different from RRR, i.e., has farther doesn some
node that RRR has not.

Without proofs your claims are just unproven wild guesses.

>> You have not shown a bijection.

> Of course every path of the Binary Tree gets chosen and gets a node 
> mapped to.

Sayin "of course" is not proof. Without a proof that every path is
mapped to a different node you have no bijection.

-- 
Mikko

Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Prolog totally missed the AI Boom Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-22 13:07 +0100
  Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-22 22:54 +0100
    Ignorance in ILP circles confirmed (Was: Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-23 18:34 +0100
    Neuro infused logic programming [NILP] (Re: Auto-Encoders as Prolog Fact Stores) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-19 21:00 +0100
  Looks like sorting of rational trees needs an existential type (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-23 13:58 +0200
    LLMs / Autoencoders could profit for Bisimulation Quotienting (Was: Looks like sorting of rational trees needs an existential type) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-23 14:02 +0200
      Are you Geh? From bi-simulation to bi-similarity (Re: LLMs / Autoencoders could profit for Bisimulation Quotienting) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-23 15:19 +0200
        Quite vibrant logic history one can experience right now! (Was: Are you Geh? From bi-simulation to bi-similarity) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-23 19:13 +0200
  The Prolog Community is extremly embarrassing (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 21:28 +0200
    Non-Wellfounded and Russell Paradox, what is your opinion? (Re: The Prolog Community is extremly embarrassing) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 21:37 +0200
      Unfinished Bimbo Stuff: 4.1. Trees as terms (Was: Non-Wellfounded and Russell Paradox, what is your opinion?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 23:03 +0200
        Gold medal waiting for the crankiest of cranks (Re: Unfinished Bimbo Stuff: 4.1. Trees as terms) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-26 16:12 +0200
          Old School Logicians waste time with compare/3 ? (Was: Gold medal waiting for the crankiest of cranks) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-26 16:18 +0200
            RIs compare/3 a sunflower study subject? (e: Old School Logicians waste time with compare/3 ?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-26 16:37 +0200
    Abstraction Engine / Pattern-Amplification AI Avalanche [Java to C# translation] (Re: The Prolog Community is extremly embarrassing (Re: Prolog totally missed the AI Boom) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-04 15:47 +0200
      Swift AI versus Apertus AI: David against Goliath (Was: Abstraction Engine / Pattern-Amplification AI Avalanche [Java to C# translation]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-10-04 16:03 +0200
        AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 16:41 +0100
          Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-20 19:06 +0000
            Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 22:57 +0100
          Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-21 11:42 +0200
            Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-21 13:47 +0100
              Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-22 11:13 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-22 14:00 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-23 11:52 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-23 16:33 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-24 10:33 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-24 20:29 +0100
                Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-24 21:44 +0000
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:31 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:32 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 20:07 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 14:04 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-04-04 20:54 +0100
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:17 +0100
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-03-25 17:55 +0000
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2026-04-30 04:43 +0200
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 09:10 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:55 +0300
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-01 09:47 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-25 10:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:31 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-26 10:18 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-26 17:21 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-27 11:52 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-27 19:04 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-28 11:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-28 17:03 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-29 12:02 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 14:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:49 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:39 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:33 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 16:45 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:58 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:38 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:51 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-31 18:34 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-01 11:12 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-01 13:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-02 10:35 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-02 20:29 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-03 10:10 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:54 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:15 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:12 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 19:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:07 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 16:07 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:14 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:51 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:35 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:01 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:01 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 10:54 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:05 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 12:49 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:50 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:54 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:38 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 10:18 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-15 16:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:41 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-16 16:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 10:08 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:10 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:52 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-18 14:40 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-20 12:34 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-20 13:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-21 10:25 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-21 12:46 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-22 11:03 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-22 15:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-23 10:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-23 15:01 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-24 09:45 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-24 14:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-25 12:14 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-25 15:36 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-26 11:30 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-26 21:33 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-27 13:03 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-27 12:19 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-28 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-28 15:18 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-29 10:42 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-29 15:02 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-30 11:54 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-30 14:49 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:33 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:14 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-02 11:47 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-02 16:02 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-03 11:09 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-03 13:30 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-04 09:37 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-04 12:47 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-05 12:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-05 17:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-06 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-06 14:11 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-07 10:32 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-07 12:35 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-08 10:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-08 14:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 10:39 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-10 15:47 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-11 10:39 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-11 12:56 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-12 10:19 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-12 12:52 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-13 12:59 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-13 22:50 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-14 11:54 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-14 17:00 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-15 09:03 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2026-04-17 01:13 -0600
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 08:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:58 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:28 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 20:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:11 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 17:07 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:20 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:56 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:46 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:07 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 11:00 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:10 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 13:02 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:28 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:24 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:45 +0200

csiph-web