Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail |
| Date | 2026-05-12 12:52 +0200 |
| Organization | tha |
| Message-ID | <10tv0pi$447q$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (26 earlier) <10tmoba$3g3or$1@dont-email.me> <10tq29h$djjb$1@dont-email.me> <10ts138$ums5$1@dont-email.me> <10tsck2$12309$1@dont-email.me> <10tukan$1p39m$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 12.05.2026 um 09:19 schrieb Mikko: > On 11/05/2026 13:56, WM wrote: >>>>> What did he mean with "name"? Apparently not the same as we do. >>> > > He said uniquely definable. That giving an individual name. >>> >>> That is compatible with the idea that hes meaning of "name" is more >>> general than the usual meaning. Apparently he accpets inifinitely >>> long strings or uncaountable sets as "names". >> >> No. He makes fun of the math tea argument which says that there are >> only countably many (necessarily finite) names. Nobody denies that >> there are uncountably many infinite strings representing real numbers >> - at least not at a math tea. > > You mean, he doesn't care about mathematical truth? What he said is wrong.> >> The purpose is to inform you that most are dark. > > Other than every is not most. Define or name rational numbers between two different given ones, may they be chosen as close as you can accomplish, such that not infinitely many remain not named. Dark numbers exist because it is clear that you would fail. >> The claim is: actual infinity exists. > > Depends on what "exists" means. It means accepted as the basis of set theory. Regards, WM
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:41 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-16 16:26 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 10:08 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:10 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:52 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-18 14:40 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-20 12:34 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-20 13:21 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-21 10:25 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-21 12:46 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-22 11:03 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-22 15:21 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-23 10:40 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-23 15:01 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-24 09:45 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-24 14:59 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-25 12:14 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-25 15:36 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-26 11:30 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-26 21:33 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-27 13:03 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-27 12:19 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-28 11:22 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-28 15:18 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-29 10:42 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-29 15:02 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-30 11:54 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-30 14:49 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:33 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:14 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-02 11:47 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-02 16:02 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-03 11:09 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-03 13:30 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-04 09:37 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-04 12:47 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-05 12:16 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-05 17:03 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-06 11:22 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-06 14:11 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-07 10:32 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-07 12:35 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-08 10:40 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-08 14:26 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 10:39 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-10 15:47 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-11 10:39 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-11 12:56 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-12 10:19 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-12 12:52 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2026-04-17 01:13 -0600
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:21 +0200
csiph-web