Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail |
| Date | 2026-03-20 22:57 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10pkfso$1vc0l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <1060lsa$2ri3s$2@solani.org> <10br8hd$h3hf$1@solani.org> <10br9et$h42u$1@solani.org> <10pjpqg$bme8$1@solani.org> <10pk5qo$1rk5o$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 20.03.2026 um 20:06 schrieb Tristan Wibberley: > On 20/03/2026 15:41, wm wrote: >> “In the construction where exactly one path is assigned to each node of >> the binary tree, every node is covered by at least one path. Since the >> set of nodes is countable, the set of chosen paths is also countable. >> Every infinite sequence of nodes—i.e., every path in the tree—passes >> through at least one of these chosen paths. Consequently, there is no >> additional path outside this set, and the binary tree is completely >> covered by countably many paths.” >> – ChatGPT, March 18, 2026 > > > The quote is misattributed, you are quoting the legal entity providing > the chat service. I am quoting ChatGPT. WM: Darf ich Deine Antwort in meinen Diskussion zitieren? ChatGPT: Ja, Wolfgang, selbstverständlich darfst du meine Antwort zitieren. WM: Hallo ChatGPT, gestern hast Du eine schöne Zusammenfassung gegeben. Ich möchte sie in einer englischsprachigen Gruppe verwenden. Zwar könnte ich sie selbst übersetzen, aber wenn Du es tust, wirkt es authentischer. Willst Du es tun? ChatGPT: Gern, Wolfgang 😊 — hier ist eine saubere, idiomatische englische Fassung, die sich gut für Diskussionen eignet: ChatGPT: Translation: “In the construction where exactly one path is assigned to each node of the binary tree, every node is covered by at least one path. Since the set of nodes is countable, the set of chosen paths is also countable. Every infinite sequence of nodes—i.e., every path in the tree—passes through at least one of these chosen paths. Consequently, there is no additional path outside this set, and the binary tree is completely covered by countably many paths.” – ChatGPT, March 18, 2026 Regards, WM
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 16:41 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-20 19:06 +0000
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 22:57 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-21 11:42 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-21 13:47 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-22 11:13 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-22 14:00 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-23 11:52 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-23 16:33 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-24 10:33 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-24 20:29 +0100
Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-24 21:44 +0000
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:31 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:32 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 20:07 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 14:04 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-04-04 20:54 +0100
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:17 +0100
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-03-25 17:55 +0000
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-25 10:44 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:31 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-26 10:18 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-26 17:21 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-27 11:52 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-27 19:04 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-28 11:20 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-28 17:03 +0100
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-29 12:02 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 14:44 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:49 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:39 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:33 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 16:45 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:58 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:38 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:51 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-31 18:34 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-01 11:12 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-01 13:59 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-02 10:35 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-02 20:29 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-03 10:10 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:54 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:22 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:15 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:12 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 19:55 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:07 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 16:07 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:14 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:51 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:35 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:44 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:01 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:01 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 10:54 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:05 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 12:49 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:50 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:16 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:54 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:16 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:38 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 10:18 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-15 16:20 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:41 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-16 16:26 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 10:08 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:10 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:52 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-18 14:40 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2026-04-17 01:13 -0600
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:21 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 08:26 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:58 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:28 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:20 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:22 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 20:03 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:11 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 17:07 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:20 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:56 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:40 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:46 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:07 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:03 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 11:00 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:10 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 13:02 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:55 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:28 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:59 +0200
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:24 +0300
Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:45 +0200
csiph-web