Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > sci.logic > #345475

Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail

From wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups sci.logic
Subject Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail
Date 2026-04-17 15:10 +0200
Organization tha
Message-ID <10rtbgn$f3j0$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (26 earlier) <10rne4s$nmgj$1@dont-email.me> <10ro6s4$coqc$1@solani.org> <ec1a76fe-d20b-4810-b4fd-e67e15595d54@iki.fi> <10rqrin$1ob8q$1@dont-email.me> <10rsm96$295lo$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 17.04.2026 um 09:08 schrieb Mikko:
> On 16/04/2026 17:26, WM wrote:
>> Am 16.04.2026 um 10:41 schrieb Mikko:
>>> On 15/04/2026 17:20, wm wrote:
>>>> Am 15.04.2026 um 09:18 schrieb Mikko:
>>>>> On 14/04/2026 21:38, WM wrote:
>>>>>> Am 14.04.2026 um 08:16 schrieb Mikko:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I mapped all nodes of the allways right going path to paths that 
>>>>>>> go left
>>>>>>> at some point beause I wanted to do so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you did not. You mapped only nodes with infinitely many 
>>>>>> successors.
>>>>> Which node does not have inifinely many successors ?
>>>
>>>> They are dark. We know however, that the complete set of nodes of a 
>>>> path has no successors. That means the nodes of the path have all 
>>>> been used up.
>>>
>>> So you can't identifiy a node without infintely may successors and
>>> have no proof that there is any but just assume that there are.
>>
>> Yes, we must adhere to Cantor's definition of actual infinity. It is 
>> not provable. Earlier generations of mathematicians adhered to 
>> potential infinity: Only what can be identifioed exists.
> 
> So you lied when you said that I only mapped nodes with infinitely
> many successors.

No. When discussing the complete Binary Tree we must accept that it is 
complete first. That implies that most nodes are dark.
> 
>  > And you can't show how they affect the validity of your claims or
>  > my proofs.
> 
> To discuss the complete Binary Tree, we must assume that it is complete. 
> This assumption yields ℵo nodes and, since each node produces one 
> additional sheaf, ℵo paths.
> 
> So all of your talk about paths that cover nodes has benn about
> non-nextent things.

When discussing the complete Binary Tree we must accept that it is 
complete first. That implies that most nodes are dark.

>  > Assuming Cantor's theory leads to a contradiction.
> 
> Indeed, Cantor's theory contradicts your claims. But that does not
> really matter as you have already contradicted your own claims.

No.
> 
> But you have not shown any internal contradiction in Cantor's theory.

I map every node to a sheaf that can be distinguished from the one 
coming in. The result is a bijection between nodes and sheaves. That 
contradicts Cantor's theory.

Regards, WM

Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 16:41 +0100
  Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-20 19:06 +0000
    Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-20 22:57 +0100
  Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-21 11:42 +0200
    Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-21 13:47 +0100
      Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-22 11:13 +0200
        Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-22 14:00 +0100
          Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-23 11:52 +0200
            Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-23 16:33 +0100
              Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-24 10:33 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-24 20:29 +0100
                Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-03-24 21:44 +0000
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:31 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 19:32 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-24 20:07 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-25 14:04 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-04-04 20:54 +0100
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:17 +0100
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2026-03-25 17:55 +0000
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2026-04-30 04:43 +0200
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 09:10 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:55 +0300
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-01 09:47 -0700
                Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-25 10:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-25 18:31 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-26 10:18 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-26 17:21 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-27 11:52 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-27 19:04 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-28 11:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-28 17:03 +0100
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-29 12:02 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 14:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:49 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:39 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:33 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-29 16:45 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-30 11:58 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-30 12:38 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-03-31 12:51 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-03-31 18:34 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-01 11:12 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-01 13:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-02 10:35 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-02 20:29 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-03 10:10 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:54 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:15 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:12 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 19:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:07 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 16:07 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:14 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:51 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:35 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:44 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:01 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:01 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 10:54 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:05 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 12:49 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:50 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:54 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:38 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-15 10:18 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-15 16:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-16 11:41 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-16 16:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-17 10:08 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:10 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-18 12:52 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-18 14:40 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-19 12:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-20 12:34 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-20 13:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-21 10:25 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-21 12:46 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-22 11:03 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-22 15:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-23 10:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-23 15:01 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-24 09:45 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-24 14:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-25 12:14 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-25 15:36 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-26 11:30 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-26 21:33 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-27 13:03 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-27 12:19 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-28 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-28 15:18 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-29 10:42 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-29 15:02 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-30 11:54 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-30 14:49 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:33 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:14 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-02 11:47 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-02 16:02 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-03 11:09 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-03 13:30 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-04 09:37 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-04 12:47 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-05 12:16 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-05 17:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-06 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-06 14:11 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-07 10:32 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-07 12:35 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-08 10:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-08 14:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-09 10:39 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-10 15:47 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-11 10:39 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-11 12:56 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-12 10:19 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-12 12:52 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-13 12:59 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-13 22:50 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2026-04-17 01:13 -0600
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-17 15:21 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 08:26 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-04 17:58 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-05 10:28 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-05 17:20 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-06 11:22 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-06 20:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-07 11:11 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-07 17:07 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-08 10:20 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-08 12:56 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-09 12:40 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-09 17:46 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-10 11:07 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-10 13:03 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-11 11:00 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-11 17:10 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-12 13:02 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-12 13:55 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-13 10:28 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-13 12:59 +0200
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-04-14 09:24 +0300
                Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-04-14 20:45 +0200

csiph-web