Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) |
| Date | 2026-04-30 04:43 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10sufjn$cb33$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <10pr2g7$1gvg$1@dont-email.me> <10prmgr$dqm9$1@solani.org> <10pti86$sb40$1@dont-email.me> <10puonp$1araa$1@dont-email.me> <10pv0kr$1cmht$3@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Am 24.03.2026 um 22:44 schrieb Tristan Wibberley: > On 24/03/2026 19:29, WM wrote: > >> Here is the complete proof of a contradiction in set theory: [qed] I see (sic!). . . . -- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2026-04-30 04:43 +0200
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 09:10 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2026-05-01 11:55 +0300
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-05-01 09:47 -0700
Re: Criticism of a proof of a contradiction in set theory (Was: Re: AI understands where 99 % of mathematicians fail) wm <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2026-05-01 15:20 +0200
csiph-web