Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #891411

Re: S paceTime

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: S paceTime
Date 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67B2A62A.3383@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (20 earlier) <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <67B04BEF.2A1D@ix.netcom.com> <voqlc8$95om$2@solani.org> <67B17B21.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67B28FA4.32D4@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Physfitfreak wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
> > > >
> > > > Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
> > > >
> > > > Einstein’s sez  space and time are two entwined entities.
> > >
> > > You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's
> > > how they're referred in physics.
> > >
> > > But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ...
> > > anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is
> > > meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
> > > and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such
> > > concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
> > > got to last better than those who didn't.
> > >
> > > You're a life form, Star :)
> >
> > I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
> >
> > https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
> >
> > space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a
> >
> > fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is
> > a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a
> > system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers
> > in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
> >
> > Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups?
> >
> 
> Keep in mind that the Official definition of the word 'spacetime' contains two opposing opinions,
> 
> one that space and time are separate, and the other that space and time are linked.
> 
> That means that it's definion has 'not yet' been settled.
> 
>I. Newton's's IQ was 190
> 
> Einstein's IQ was 160
> 
> Einstein is incompetent..he reached his level of incompetence.
> 
> Let me put it simply this way...
> 
> if our Sun were to simply disapear..
> out Earth will feel it's disaperance..immeditaly, ...not minutes later.
> 
> --
 

I. Newton's IQ was 190
 
A. Einstein's IQ was 160

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 20:30 -0800
  Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 08:06 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 23:39 -0800
      Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 12:10 +0100
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:34 -0800
          Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 19:45 +0100
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:52 -0800
              Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 20:43 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 12:41 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 14:14 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 23:28 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600
              Re: S paceTime bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-04 09:50 +0000
  Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 09:34 +0100

csiph-web