Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #891410

Re: S paceTime

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: S paceTime
Date 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67B28FA4.32D4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (19 earlier) <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com> <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <67B04BEF.2A1D@ix.netcom.com> <voqlc8$95om$2@solani.org> <67B17B21.3ABB@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Physfitfreak wrote:
> >
> > On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
> > >
> > > Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
> > >
> > > Einstein’s sez  space and time are two entwined entities.
> >
> > You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's
> > how they're referred in physics.
> >
> > But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ...
> > anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is
> > meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
> > and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such
> > concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
> > got to last better than those who didn't.
> >
> > You're a life form, Star :)
> 
> I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities
> 
> https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
> 
> https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
> 
> space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a
> 
> fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is
> a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a
> system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers
> in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
> 
> Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups?
> 


Keep in mind that the Official definition of the word 'spacetime' contains two opposing opinions,

one that space and time are separate, and the other that space and time are linked.

That means that it's definion has 'not yet' been settled.


Wagner's IQ was 190

Einstein's IQ was 160


Einstein is incompetent..he reached his level of incompetence.


Let me put it simply this way...

if our Sun were to simply disapear..
out Earth will feel it's disaperance..immeditaly, ...not minutes later.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 20:30 -0800
  Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 08:06 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 23:39 -0800
      Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 12:10 +0100
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:34 -0800
          Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 19:45 +0100
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:52 -0800
              Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 20:43 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 12:41 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 14:14 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 23:28 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600
              Re: S paceTime bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-04 09:50 +0000
  Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 09:34 +0100

csiph-web