Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661246

Re: S paceTime

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

There should be a Law, or a Rule...

that the word "concept" actually means the same thing as the word "opinion".


"In Einstein’s concept of the physical  universe,.."

The Law, or a Rule...should be mandated that the word:OPINION should be
written befome making any statement by Albert Einstein.


OPINION: In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,  space and time are regarded as entwined.


OPINION
OPINION
OPINION

to prevent misinformation.


From now on from this day forward, if anyone post a statment made by Albert Einstein, it should be first followed
with the word.

OPINION:



Because, that's all it is...an Opinion.


Not worth the paper it is written on.


For example...

OPINION: 'Nothing travel faster than the speed of light.'



OPINION: "Time and space are modes by which we think and not conditions in which we live."

OPINION: "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once."

OPINION: "When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute, and it’s longer than any hour. That’s relativity."

OPINION: "Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That’s relativity."

OPINION: "The distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."

OPINION: "There is no absolute space and absolute time. Time and space are relative to the observer."

OPINION: "An observer who is in relative motion with respect to another will experience time and space differently."

OPINION: "A hundred times a day I remind myself that my inner and outer life depend on the labors of other men, living and dead, and that I must exert myself in order to give in the same measure as I have received."

OPINION: "Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before the age of eighteen."

OPINION: "Space-time does not claim existence on its own but only as a structural quality of the field."

OPINION: "The special theory of relativity owes its origins to Maxwell’s equations of the electromagnetic field."

OPINION: "Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore."

OPINION: "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

OPINION: "If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts."

OPINION: "It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing."

OPINION: "Time and space are fused together in a four-dimensional continuum known as space-time."

OPINION: "In the framework of general relativity, space-time tells matter how to move, and matter tells space-time how to curve."

OPINION: "The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter how they are moving."

OPINION: "The more successful the quantum theory is, the sillier it looks."

OPINION: "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing."


Do I make myself clear?








The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Okay, let's jump to Einstein...
> 
> The first BIG LIE is..."In Einstein’s concept of the physical
> universe,..."
> 
> "concept" relates to the mind, and "physical" relates to concrete
> bodies, concept is relating to the mind as oppsed to the concrete
> physical  bodies.
> 
> The author of the definition is pulling a 'fast one'.
> 
> You cannot trust these motherfuckers.
> 
> and injects:
> 
> based on a system of geometry , space and time are  entwined,..."
> 
> "entwined"?? oh, oh...here come the curves!
> 
> There are no straight lines or curves in the physical universe...it
> exist Only In The Mind.
> 
> That is just a concept/theory/opinion/hypothesis, etc.
> 
> "In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,..." translates to...
> 
> "In Einstein’s opinion of the physical universe,..."
> "In Einstein’s notion of the physical universe,..."
> "In Einstein’s theory of the physical universe,..."
> "In Einstein’s view of the physical universe,..."
> 
> Nothing is real.
> 
> Oh my gawd, I'm getting strangled in spacetime by twined vines!
> 
> The web of the universe is of a mingles yarn...
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Now, the very next sentence reads: "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
> >
> > Everybody knows the smartest person in the world EVER is Newton.
> >
> > "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
> >
> > 'space and time are separate entities'
> >
> > "as obvious to any competent observer."
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
> > > time.."
> > >
> > > Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth
> > > dimension", or even the third dimension.
> > >
> > > (or anyone else for that matter)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein
> > > > writes it)
> > > >
> > > > it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
> > > > it also is biased towards Einstein.
> > > >
> > > > The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
> > > >
> > > > Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no
> > > > existence out there, anywhere.
> > > >
> > > > It's all in the mind.
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
> > > > >
> > > > > space–time
> > > > >
> > > > > "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
> > > > > time.
> > > > > In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
> > > > > and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
> > > > > as obvious to any competent observer.
> > > > > In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of
> > > > > geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are
> > > > > regarded as entwined,
> > > > > so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the
> > > > > simultaneity of distant events.
> > > > > In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a
> > > > > fourdimensional continuum."
> > > > >
> > > > > "space and time are considered as separate entities"
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > it's about Euclidean geometry.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
> > > > > > Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the
> > > > > > Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination  called, SpaceTime.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved
> > > > > > lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
> > > > > > geometry.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't you guys got anything ...real????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30
> > > > > > chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
> > > > > > heard anything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
  Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
    Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
    Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
      Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
        Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
          Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
            Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
              Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
                Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
                Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
                Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
                Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600

csiph-web