Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: S paceTime Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 18:59:54 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 69 Message-ID: <67B2A62A.3383@ix.netcom.com> References: <67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com> <1820a0e7fb2444bf$15299$1433769$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <67A072A1.4890@ix.netcom.com> <1820ae376b46d694$13020$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <67A10C50.3153@ix.netcom.com> <1820c709d718ea16$13041$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <67A11070.5121@ix.netcom.com> <1820ca3af637642c$10679$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <67A12A10.2A78@ix.netcom.com> <1820d0d57014da41$10681$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <67A13FC6.25E2@ix.netcom.com> <1820d33f2e981c00$15766$1407297$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <67A17706.484A@ix.netcom.com> <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com> <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com> <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB9DF2.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com> <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <67B04BEF.2A1D@ix.netcom.com> <67B17B21.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67B28FA4.32D4@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:59:34 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fc64a6838bbae248926a3e4b402e2327"; logging-data="920872"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tnouelsNXg4fzvtL4WYDJhlCuB7oTG8s=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:AU8hXuAErm8OWFaZ59ran3KUP/Y= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250216-6, 02/16/2025), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:661271 sci.physics:891411 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > > > On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The bottom line is that you have two different opinions: > > > > > > > > Newton says space and time are two separate entities. > > > > > > > > Einstein’s sez space and time are two entwined entities. > > > > > > You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's > > > how they're referred in physics. > > > > > > But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ... > > > anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is > > > meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only, > > > and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such > > > concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it, > > > got to last better than those who didn't. > > > > > > You're a life form, Star :) > > > > I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities > > > > https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up > > > > https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up > > > > space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a > > > > fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is > > a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a > > system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers > > in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum." > > > > Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups? > > > > Keep in mind that the Official definition of the word 'spacetime' contains two opposing opinions, > > one that space and time are separate, and the other that space and time are linked. > > That means that it's definion has 'not yet' been settled. > >I. Newton's's IQ was 190 > > Einstein's IQ was 160 > > Einstein is incompetent..he reached his level of incompetence. > > Let me put it simply this way... > > if our Sun were to simply disapear.. > out Earth will feel it's disaperance..immeditaly, ...not minutes later. > > -- I. Newton's IQ was 190 A. Einstein's IQ was 160 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.