Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #891348
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: S paceTime |
| Date | 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com> <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB9DF2.1A88@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Okay, let's jump to Einstein... The first BIG LIE is..."In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,..." "concept" relates to the mind, and "physical" relates to concrete bodies, concept is relating to the mind as oppsed to the concrete physical bodies. The author of the definition is pulling a 'fast one'. You cannot trust these motherfuckers. and injects: based on a system of geometry , space and time are entwined,..." "entwined"?? oh, oh...here come the curves! There are no straight lines or curves in the physical universe...it exist Only In The Mind. That is just a concept/theory/opinion/hypothesis, etc. "In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,..." translates to... "In Einstein’s opinion of the physical universe,..." "In Einstein’s notion of the physical universe,..." "In Einstein’s theory of the physical universe,..." "In Einstein’s view of the physical universe,..." Nothing is real. Oh my gawd, I'm getting strangled in spacetime by twined vines! The web of the universe is of a mingles yarn... The Starmaker wrote: > > Now, the very next sentence reads: "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..." > > Everybody knows the smartest person in the world EVER is Newton. > > "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..." > > 'space and time are separate entities' > > "as obvious to any competent observer." > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of > > time.." > > > > Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth > > dimension", or even the third dimension. > > > > (or anyone else for that matter) > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein > > > writes it) > > > > > > it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And > > > it also is biased towards Einstein. > > > > > > The definition starts off with..."A geometry...." > > > > > > Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no > > > existence out there, anywhere. > > > > > > It's all in the mind. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime": > > > > > > > > space–time > > > > > > > > "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of > > > > time. > > > > In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities > > > > and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded > > > > as obvious to any competent observer. > > > > In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of > > > > geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are > > > > regarded as entwined, > > > > so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the > > > > simultaneity of distant events. > > > > In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a > > > > fourdimensional continuum." > > > > > > > > "space and time are considered as separate entities" > > > > > > > > > > > it's about Euclidean geometry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Straight lines is ...'just a theory'. > > > > > > > > > > In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space. > > > > > > > > > > Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and > > > > > Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language. > > > > > > > > > > The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the > > > > > Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime. > > > > > > > > > > SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved > > > > > lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical > > > > > geometry. > > > > > > > > > > Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'. > > > > > > > > > > Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory! > > > > > > > > > > Don't you guys got anything ...real???? > > > > > > > > > > Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30 > > > > > chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false. > > > > > > > > > > Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't > > > > > heard anything. > > > > > > > > > > Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her. > > > > > > > > > > Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 20:30 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 08:06 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-02 23:39 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 12:10 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:34 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 19:45 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 10:52 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 20:43 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 12:41 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 22:44 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 14:14 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 23:28 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 18:10 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-03 21:50 -0800
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 07:25 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-09 23:30 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 01:48 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 09:57 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:33 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 10:58 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-11 11:33 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-13 21:17 -0800
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-14 00:05 -0600
Re: S paceTime Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-14 16:13 +0000
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-14 11:35 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:12 -0800
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 11:59 -0600
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 00:10 -0800
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 12:11 -0600
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-15 21:44 -0800
Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-16 09:13 +0100
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:01 -0600
Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 14:54 -0600
Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-16 22:44 +0100
Re: Fickfuck <physfitfreak@gmail.com> 404 brain not found (Was: S paceTime) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 16:15 -0600
Re: S paceTime Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-17 07:44 +0100
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 17:23 -0800
Re: S paceTime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-16 18:59 -0800
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:42 -0600
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 21:47 -0600
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 22:13 -0600
Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-19 07:55 +0100
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0600
Re: S paceTime Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-23 17:56 -0600
Re: S paceTime bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-04 09:50 +0000
Re: S paceTime Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 09:34 +0100
csiph-web