Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #664745
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? |
| Date | Tue, 01 Jul 2025 07:51:19 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Lines | 108 |
| Message-ID | <6863F5E7.A71@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <684DCF74.4FB4@ix.netcom.com> <slrn105cndr.fi9.anthk@openbsd.home> <self-aware-20250621191428@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <1038akn$14dra$1@solani.org> <68584FE2.552B@ix.netcom.com> <103djju$16uqt$1@solani.org> <685B067C.1898@ix.netcom.com> <103g4mv$197a6$1@solani.org> <685C4775.69C@ix.netcom.com> <103ivam$19llk$1@solani.org> <685D8495.16DB@ix.netcom.com> <103l9ib$1b4vk$1@solani.org> <685E2E8D.1043@ix.netcom.com> <103o6m0$1cs94$1@solani.org> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 01 Jul 2025 16:50:54 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="963e1b0c0c05cf8ad93efe1802723cdf"; logging-data="3056462"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+k0b7clnWFHEf+REf97no8ppU5RF+xdH4=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:kf5uNySewQdSZUp+WdxoEHVP3MA= |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 250701-2, 07/01/2025), Outbound message |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:664745 sci.physics:893727 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Are you aware Jan that not only you have 'no self-awareness' but also you have no free will? Jan Panteltje wrote: > > >Jan Panteltje wrote: > >> > >> >I see, you one of 'those' that post links that you yourself don't > >> >read... > >> > > >> > > >> >"Mirror tests" have been done on chimpanzees, elephants, dolphins and > >> >magpies. > >> > > >> > > >> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-awareness#:~:text=%5B39%5D-,Non%2Dhuman%20animals,-%5Bedit%5D > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >German people are sooo lazy they take more sick days and any other euro > >> >country! > >> > > >> > > >> >Are you fat too? > >> > >> It is sad that once you lost comprehension of the subject you start insulting. > >> Low IQ sign. > >> > >> No I am not German. > >> FYI: I am an alien lifeform doing some investigation here to see if you humming-beans pose a danger to the Intergalactic > >> Union. > >> If so, then you may be beamed-up. > >> We have zoos were we keep a few of your species for tourists. > >> Earth is not visited by many of us, as the intergalactic travel agency has advised against visiting earth as it is infested > >> with humans and those are considered dangerous. > >> So much for Seti. > > > > > >That which you believe is "self-awarness"... > >according to Albert Einstein is simply a...optical delusion. > > > >It's sad that you and everyone else deny > >that which you believe is "self-awarness"...a self is simply > > > >an optical delusion. > > > > > >There are no "self-awarness" life forms on earth... > > > >and intelligent life does not exist on earth either. > > > > > >But I know yous people need your "optical delusions" to survive. > > > > > >Therefore you are not. > > > > > >If you are not German, that means you are not fat. > > > > > >wat other kind of people live in Germany? > > I do not know if you ever did some programing or neural net programing, > or ever designed some 'machine' that did some task.. You sound a bit confused > > 'Self awareness' is easy implemented by adding either some code or some hardware looking at what > other parts of the system do, call it 'mirror neurons' or whatever, > as I explained in the 'sunscreen with voice added example. > No big deal and no dots on your head either. In that layer of extra (soft or hardware or both) MEMORY is > an important part, it enables 'learning', > In a biological system the learning may be stored even in the configuration or in RNA or DNA in cells > and self modification of the neural net is also possible. We are, really, very simple. > > Some religious fanatic groups (basically kids who were fed false concepts and made slaves of their masters) > will deny anything simple, make a big spectacle of a 'heaven or 'hell' > and deny life is everywhere in the universe. Even the first Viking Mars experiment that was positive for life war denounced hours later! > http://www.gillevin.com/ > We need a better system, US is dead. > > Maybe as soon as kids learn to play with software and neural net software and bots, will they SEE that they are being used by some religious fanatic idiots, > Design something. > Or maybe their DNS structure is modified to make them 'great believers' > In that case the species will either die, or hold back evolution for many years > because of religious concepts. > Ultimately Darwin applies, some other lifeform, from fungi to what not, may outlive and outsmart the human species. > Holy shit what goes: > Pay money to your religious leader and you are a 'good believer' > In medieval times the sun was orbiting the earth and they had math to show where it was , and the planets, at any time > As full of bullshit as Albert E science was, and for a fact is still today. > > For the real a tit fitty club, if Le Sage particles travel at (approximately) C and light is a state of those LS particles then > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges-Louis_Le_Sage > we are done with Albert E. and if these LS particles originate in stars or holes (black or white duh), then the universe will expand > Throw in some slowing of the LS particles over time .. > Near to earth more Le Sage particles are intercepted by earth, matter gets less compressed, 'the pendulum get longer' > time slows down! And you should also see spectrum widening, as the particle flux is now different coming from different sides. > Now it is fun again, no singularities > at some point all particles are intercepted, no math bullshit divide by zero, MOVE ON . > There are no infinities in Nature, something will always give way. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-14 12:37 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-15 07:02 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-06-15 09:43 +0200
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 07:59 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-15 13:10 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-06-15 14:18 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> - 2025-06-21 16:28 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2025-06-21 18:19 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-22 07:16 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-22 11:48 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-24 07:20 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-25 06:24 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-25 12:01 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-26 08:11 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-26 10:34 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-26 22:39 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-06-26 22:45 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-06-28 07:47 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-01 07:51 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-07-02 06:41 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-02 10:56 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-02 20:03 +0100
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-02 13:12 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? squalk <sq@net.inv> - 2025-07-02 21:21 +0100
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-07-02 15:30 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-03 20:06 +0200
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-03 20:04 +0200
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-07-03 08:24 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-07-03 08:37 +0000
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-07-07 22:03 -0700
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-07-03 20:01 +0200
Re: Can a Machine become self-aware? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-06-21 14:43 -0700
csiph-web