Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #737068

Re: remedial nerd

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/20/2025 2:50 PM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:22:27 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>>
>>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:46:18 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>>> If you have to turn to Fox news for your 'facts', you have lost any
>>>>> credibility you may have had.
>>>>
>>>> Multiple sources cite the huge adolescent trans peak and its recent
>>>> 50% drop.
>>>
>>> Then why didn't you quote a known reliable source that would make your
>>> argument appear credible instead of a source that is known for its bias?
>>
>> You can look it up wherever. The Fox link was the first one that
>> google came up with.
>>
>>>
>>> I wasn't questioning the apparent drop in numbers, I was pointing out
>>> that it is most likely to be one of the intended consequences of the
>>> recent increase in persecution.
>>
>> Doubt it. It was just a fad peaking.
>>
>> Being gay or trans used to be a felony. Persecution is way down.
> 
> Is that supposed to be a bad joke or is it just downright
> misrepresentation or ignorance of the facts?

It's the "I haven't personally called someone a fag in years, how can 
you say the US is a bigoted place"-argument, pretty standard material 
for US conservatives.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 19:54 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 12:42 -0400
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 10:53 -0700
      Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 21:19 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:26 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 12:40 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 14:48 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:46 +0100
            Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 08:33 -0700
              Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 17:22 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 10:43 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 19:50 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 13:27 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 22:14 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 09:14 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-21 12:29 -0400
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 11:33 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-22 08:25 +0000
      Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 18:53 -0400
        Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:58 +0100
          Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-20 12:37 -0400
            Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 18:07 +0100
    Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:42 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd Cursitor Doom <cd6699@notformail.com> - 2025-10-26 08:23 +0000
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-26 07:52 -0700

csiph-web