Re: remedial nerd

Date	2025-10-20 12:37 -0400
Subject	Re: remedial nerd
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
References	<5lk8fk5a10nr0h56l5avpl5c61vc7phqpa@4ax.com> <68f514e6$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <429afkd5jghvfuq30ggjkfk3471ues694o@4ax.com> <68f56bf8$0$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <1rkhy98.1gqeni71g5n5j4N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
From	bitrex <user@example.net>
Message-ID	<68f6653d$1$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/20/2025 4:58 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
> bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
> 
> [...]
>>
>> Anything but redesign public restrooms. The incorporation of filthy
>> pee-splattered urinals and stalls that don't go floor-to-ceiling and
>> leave your ankles exposed is so important to our society, what would we
>> do without them.
>>
>> Basically all vaguely pragmatic concerns with transgender people could
>> be solved by a (imo long-overdue) facilities redesign. The rest is just
>> bigotry, which engineering can't address.
> 
> Brilliant!
> 
> May I use that as a quote please?
> 
> 

Sure thing. For hundreds of years as men we've been standing next to 
each other over pee-splattered urinals staring straight ahead and 
hauling our dicks out to pee within 6" of other dudes.

Nobody I know with a dick enjoys this process. Just build a "bathroom" 
that has a unisex area for hand washing and some damn stalls that offer 
actual privacy to do one's business in. Simple. Cost effective.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 19:54 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 12:42 -0400
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 10:53 -0700
      Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 21:19 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:26 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 12:40 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 14:48 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:46 +0100
            Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 08:33 -0700
              Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 17:22 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 10:43 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 19:50 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 13:27 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 22:14 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 09:14 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-21 12:29 -0400
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 11:33 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-22 08:25 +0000
      Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 18:53 -0400
        Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:58 +0100
          Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-20 12:37 -0400
            Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 18:07 +0100
    Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:42 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd Cursitor Doom <cd6699@notformail.com> - 2025-10-26 08:23 +0000
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-26 07:52 -0700

csiph-web