Re: remedial nerd

From	liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham)
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: remedial nerd
Date	2025-10-20 17:22 +0100
Organization	Poppy Records
Message-ID	<1rkiil9.zsuo7c1l066zyN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <429afkd5jghvfuq30ggjkfk3471ues694o@4ax.com> <1rkgxya.1t0d2cg1qoaoqsN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <98mafk9mt88h7vcgr12qus3clcl85qukoo@4ax.com> <1rkhvv1.1ij8ywfsrgfcuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <35lcfk1bj4u9ebel7175d13mp2uakbl2mp@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 09:46:18 +0100, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

[...]
> >If you have to turn to Fox news for your 'facts', you have lost any
> >credibility you may have had.  
> 
> Multiple sources cite the huge adolescent trans peak and its recent
> 50% drop. 

Then why didn't you quote a known reliable source that would make your
argument appear credible instead of a source that is known for its bias?

I wasn't questioning the apparent drop in numbers, I was pointing out
that it is most likely to be one of the intended consequences of the
recent increase in persecution.

[...]

> If you look and sound and dress female, it would be easier for people
> to call you Mary. Mixed modes are more difficult.

It sounds as though you are saying that only trans people who don't look
trans are allowed to be treated properly.

-- 
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-18 19:54 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 12:42 -0400
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 10:53 -0700
      Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-19 21:19 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-19 13:26 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 12:40 +0100
        Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-19 14:48 -0700
          Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:46 +0100
            Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 08:33 -0700
              Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 17:22 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 10:43 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 19:50 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-20 13:27 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 22:14 +0100
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 09:14 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-21 12:29 -0400
                Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-21 11:33 -0700
                Re: remedial nerd Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-10-22 08:25 +0000
      Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-19 18:53 -0400
        Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 09:58 +0100
          Re: remedial nerd bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-10-20 12:37 -0400
            Re: remedial nerd liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-10-20 18:07 +0100
    Re: remedial nerd Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-10-20 02:42 -0700
  Re: remedial nerd Cursitor Doom <cd6699@notformail.com> - 2025-10-26 08:23 +0000
    Re: remedial nerd john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-10-26 07:52 -0700

csiph-web