Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps

comp.sys.mac.apps

47129 articles, 944 threads (numbers 7 – 47490) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Hogwasher (3 replies) Paul Goodman <goodmanp@comcast.net> 2026-05-02 23:02 -0400
   → Re: Hogwasher Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2026-05-03 19:33 +1200
   → Re: Hogwasher Tim <nope@nada.com> 2026-05-04 20:17 -0500
     → Re: Hogwasher Paul Goodman <no_email@invalid.invalid> 2026-05-05 02:33 +0000
 
Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? (31 replies) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2025-10-15 17:27 +0000
   → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? alanrichardbarker@gmail.com.invalid (Alan B) 2025-10-15 17:56 +0000
     → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-04-27 11:15 +0100
       → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld) 2026-04-27 23:59 +0000
         → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-04-28 09:18 +0100
           → Printer problem with macOS Sequoia (was : Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-04-28 09:30 +0100
     → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-04-27 22:42 +0000
   → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) 2025-10-15 20:43 +0200
   → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? Tyrone <none@none.none> 2025-10-15 21:52 +0000
   → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2025-10-15 23:08 +0000
   → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "Matt Swart" <matt.swart@icloud.com> 2026-03-22 19:13 +1000
     → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-22 23:39 +0000
       → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-24 01:22 +0000
         → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-24 11:21 +0000
           → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-25 02:01 +0000
           → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-25 02:30 +0000
             → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-25 09:02 +0000
               → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-25 16:21 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-25 17:04 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-27 23:37 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-28 09:15 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2026-03-29 11:01 +1300
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-28 22:15 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-29 14:31 +0100
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-30 02:22 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? Creon <creon@creon.earth> 2026-03-30 06:12 +0000
                 → Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP? "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-30 10:31 +0100
                 → OT: dhs.org (was Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-30 23:58 +0000
                 → Re: OT: dhs.org (was Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-31 08:28 +0100
                 → Re: OT: dhs.org (was Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) 2026-03-31 18:22 +0000
                 → Re: OT: dhs.org (was Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) "David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> 2026-03-31 20:29 +0100
                 → Re: OT: dhs.org (was Re: Is macOS Sequoia v15.7.1 good in 2020 13" Intel MBP?) Creon <creon@creon.earth> 2026-04-01 09:30 +0000
 
The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) (67 replies) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-20 03:09 +0000
   → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-19 20:16 -0700
   → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-20 07:07 -0400
     → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-20 11:25 +0000
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-20 13:56 +0000
     → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> 2024-07-20 10:49 -0400
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-20 15:04 +0000
         → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 01:59 +0000
           → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-20 22:06 -0400
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 02:14 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-21 10:03 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 14:26 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> 2024-07-21 17:26 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 17:57 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-21 19:09 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-21 16:11 -0700
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2024-07-22 13:18 +1200
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-21 17:24 -0700
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2024-07-22 10:10 +1200
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-22 02:09 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-21 19:24 -0700
         → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> 2024-07-21 06:26 -0400
           → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-21 11:19 +0000
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> 2024-07-31 05:50 +0000
     → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2024-07-21 11:13 +1200
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 01:56 +0000
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-20 22:01 -0400
         → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 02:06 +0000
           → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-20 22:10 -0400
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 05:29 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-21 10:03 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 14:23 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-21 19:06 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-22 02:29 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-21 19:32 -0700
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-22 10:46 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-22 15:06 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> 2024-07-22 15:16 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-22 12:24 -0700
           → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-21 02:54 +0000
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 05:24 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-21 09:50 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-21 14:15 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-21 17:26 -0700
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2024-07-22 07:29 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-22 12:57 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-22 14:28 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2024-07-22 18:31 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-23 04:50 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2024-07-23 20:17 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> 2024-07-24 00:04 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-24 11:15 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-24 09:28 -0700
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2024-07-22 07:27 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-22 14:19 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2024-07-28 20:29 -0400
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Andrew <andrew@spam.net> 2024-07-29 01:56 +0000
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-29 12:59 -0700
                 → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> 2026-04-10 13:48 -0400
         → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> 2024-07-31 05:50 +0000
           → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2024-07-31 19:35 +1200
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2024-07-31 10:20 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2024-07-31 09:24 -0700
             → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> 2024-07-31 15:24 +0000
               → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> 2024-08-02 06:00 +0000
     → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Norman Sylvia <iliketowatch@cox.net> 2024-07-20 20:33 -0400
       → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2024-07-21 15:29 +1200
         → Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence) Norman Sylvia <nsylvia1@cox.net> 2024-07-21 20:18 -0400
 
[NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices (5 replies) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2026-02-25 18:13 +1300
   → Re: [NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2026-02-25 10:20 -0500
     → Re: [NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> 2026-02-25 17:55 +0100
       → Re: [NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> 2026-02-25 20:34 +0000
         → Re: [NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> 2026-02-25 22:22 +0100
   → Re: [NEWS] 1Password increases subscription prices "Matt Swart" <matt.swart@icloud.com> 2026-03-22 19:05 +1000
 
[NEWS] Apple buys Kuzu Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2026-02-12 14:48 +1300
 
Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's (5 replies) Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> 2025-12-13 09:55 +1300
   → Re: Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's Old McDonald <down@farm.corn> 2025-12-12 23:21 -0800
     → Re: Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> 2025-12-14 09:59 +1300
   → Re: Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> 2025-12-14 12:04 +0100
     → Re: Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's kurtz le pirate <kurtzlepirate@free.fr> 2025-12-14 17:38 +0100
       → Re: Article: Inside FileMaker Pro - the massive hit few realize is Apple's Helpful Harry <HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> 2025-12-15 11:00 +1300
 
Windows/macOS/Linux script to analyse CISA KEV for Apple zero-day holes Marion <mariond@facts.com> 2025-11-06 08:07 -0700
 
[NEWS] Affinity individual apps replaced by one big free app Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-10-31 17:02 +1300
 
Tutorial: How to Load a PAC File Directly from Disk in Firefox (No Web Server Needed) Marion <mariond@facts.com> 2025-10-30 00:27 -0600
 
Re: Google accessed users' mobile devices to collect, save and use their data (1 reply) Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-09-07 21:27 +0000
   → Re: Google accessed users' mobile devices to collect, save and use their data Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2025-09-08 10:52 -0700
 
Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users (12 replies) Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-07-06 15:14 +0000
   → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> 2025-07-06 19:27 +0200
   → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Edward Chan <invalid@invalid.invalid> 2025-07-06 18:52 +0000
     → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users georg.schwarz@freenet.de (Georg Schwarz) 2025-07-06 22:34 +0200
       → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Chris Schram <chrispam1@me.com> 2025-07-06 21:41 +0000
   → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users cal@invalid.net 2025-07-06 15:15 -0500
     → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users cal@invalid.net 2025-07-07 13:54 -0500
     → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> 2025-07-07 22:34 +0200
   → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> 2025-07-06 21:27 +0000
   → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Sam Coats <sam.coats@gmail.com> 2025-07-07 23:30 +0000
     → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-07-08 15:22 +1200
     → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Yusuf Khan <yusuf.khan.nospam@ptcl.net.pk> 2025-07-11 10:24 +0500
       → Re: Firefox Now Sells User Data - Here's How This Affects Mac Users Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-07-11 18:31 +1200
 
URL expertise needed, please! (was - I expect you know this!) (25 replies) "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-06-25 09:40 +0100
   → Re: URL expertise needed, please! (was - I expect you know this!) "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-06-26 14:12 +0100
     → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-06-26 16:00 +0000
       → Re: URL expertise needed, please! "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-06-26 17:14 +0100
         → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-06-26 16:21 +0000
           → Re: URL expertise needed, please! "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-06-26 20:04 +0100
             → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-06-27 08:46 +1200
               → Re: URL expertise needed, please! "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-06-26 22:10 +0100
               → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-06-27 04:29 +0000
             → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-06-27 05:22 +0000
               → Re: URL expertise needed, please! "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-07-04 20:33 +0100
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-05 17:38 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! "David B." <BoaterDave@hotmail.co.uk> 2025-07-06 08:42 +0100
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 08:02 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 07:21 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 17:01 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 13:29 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 23:22 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 16:29 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 23:35 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 16:52 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-07 00:03 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 17:12 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-07 00:18 +0000
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! % <pursent100@gmail.com> 2025-07-06 17:32 -0700
                 → Re: URL expertise needed, please! Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> 2025-07-07 04:23 +0000
 
[NEWS] Abode raises prices and changes plan names Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-05-21 11:27 +1200
 
Re: A good thing or a bad thing (3 replies) Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-04-15 17:54 +0000
   → Re: A good thing or a bad thing Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-04-15 18:09 +0000
   → Re: A good thing or a bad thing Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2025-04-15 11:26 -0700
   → Re: A good thing or a bad thing Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> 2025-04-15 21:36 +0000
 
Unique Apple tracking & locking of even free & open source apps to an Apple ID Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-04-07 20:37 +0000
 
Re: bouncing phone Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-04-06 05:40 +0000
 
[NEWS] Microsoft to shut down Skype (3 replies) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-03-01 12:20 +1300
   → Re: [NEWS] Microsoft to shut down Skype Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> 2025-03-01 10:58 +0000
     → Re: [NEWS] Microsoft to shut down Skype Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-03-02 09:51 +1300
       → Re: [NEWS] Microsoft to shut down Skype rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) 2025-03-03 07:04 +0000
 
Re: google apps Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-01-30 21:23 +0000
 
Re: google apps (1 reply) Marion <marion@facts.com> 2025-01-30 19:36 +0000
   → Re: google apps Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> 2025-01-30 11:58 -0800
 
[OT News] Microsoft Excel World Championships 2024 Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> 2025-01-23 09:59 +1300

~Page 1 of ~223 (articles 47382–47490) Older →


csiph-web