Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.setup > #4422 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500 |
| Last post | 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 303 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.setup
Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 07:52 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-09-27 13:18 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:32 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:40 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 15:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 11:17 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-27 07:36 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-27 20:42 +0200
Re: Linux Crashing Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-09-27 12:59 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:49 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:20 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 08:24 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 14:49 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 09:09 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:21 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:30 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:01 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:34 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 15:55 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 21:53 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 04:08 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 22:54 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 01:59 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:31 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:13 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:15 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:34 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:10 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 23:16 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:20 -0600
BigTech, BigMedia & BigGovernment. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:38 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:33 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:35 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 13:13 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:26 +0000
I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 06:36 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-30 09:33 -0500
Dilbert.COM Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:47 -0700
Re: Dilbert.COM RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-30 11:21 -0400
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:40 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 06:19 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 12:51 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 08:05 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:18 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:20 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 02:24 +0000
I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 09:46 -0700
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:11 -0600
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:26 +0100
Re: I don't trust programmers who knock #define | goto. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:54 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:32 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 15:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:06 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:09 -0600
## is a godsend. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:29 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 01:52 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 10:56 +0000
"z1.CPP" ain't no "Dilbert.COM".OopsOops Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 08:57 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:59 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:31 -0600
Improving "z1.CPP" is a pure joy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:24 -0700
Re: ## is a godsend. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: ## is a godsend. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:35 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:15 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 11:11 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:43 +0000
"Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:48 -0700
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:21 -0600
How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:40 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:44 +0100
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:42 -0500
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:36 +0000
The Covid cult liberated me from my shackles. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:18 -0700
Re: How do you think I kept my 30 year "gig" ? Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:32 +0000
Re: "Dilbert.COM" has to be "readable". Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:56 -0400
My code was forked. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:03 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:18 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 00:46 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:34 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:28 +0000
No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:27 -0700
Re: No one here cares about what my code actually *does*. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 10:40 +0100
One huge routine. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:17 -0700
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Max sucks dicks. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 10:04 -0700
Re: Max sucks dicks. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:27 +0000
Re: One huge routine. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:27 -0600
Re: One huge routine. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:30 +0000
Re: One huge routine. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 15:30 -0500
Macros & Muscle Memory keep it simple. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:47 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-01 16:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 16:55 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:00 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:04 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:43 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 08:09 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 12:42 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 21:15 -0600
Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-01 21:36 -0700
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 05:04 +0000
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 06:44 -0500
Re: Whitespace & Comments indicates _problems_. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:05 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:03 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:07 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 08:56 +0100
"Permies" aren't script kiddies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:10 -0700
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:29 +0100
People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:40 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 16:45 +0000
Cheating. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Cheating. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-10-02 13:30 -0500
Your "Up" is my "Down". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Cheating. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 15:32 -0400
Re: Cheating. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 14:43 -0500
Me, my daughter, and my son. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:50 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-02 16:51 -0500
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-10-02 15:29 -0700
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:36 +0000
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-02 22:17 -0400
Re: Me, my daughter, and my son. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 03:26 +0100
My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 13:03 -0700
Re: My kids were born blonde and blue-eyed. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:34 +0000
I was blonde, when younger. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:21 -0700
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:50 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:16 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:04 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:11 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:31 -0500
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:53 +0000
Re: I was blonde, when younger. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:42 -0500
Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:08 -0700
Re: Tell me you don't like "Former U.S.S.R." girls of Nordic origin ! Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 -0500
Re: Cheating. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:25 +0000
I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 20:14 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 23:26 -0500
Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 21:45 -0700
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:51 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:18 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:35 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:10 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:13 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 19:52 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:03 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:32 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2021-10-03 20:39 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Helmut Achterberg <"Helmut Achterberg"@localonly.com> - 2021-10-03 21:21 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:48 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:46 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-10-03 19:53 -0400
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:33 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:54 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 01:05 -0500
Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:09 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:18 -0600
Seattle's not big on tolerance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Seattle hates smokers with a deep passion. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:18 +0000
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 12:03 -0600
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 21:46 -0500
Re: Ny ex-wife wanted 4 more kids, I didn't. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:55 -0600
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:50 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:55 +0000
TFZ is better then Face-To-Face sex. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 09:41 -0700
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 19:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 04:49 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 00:15 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 10:34 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:01 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 19:10 +0000
Life is everything, yet nothing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 12:17 -0700
Re: Life is everything, yet nothing. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 18:30 -0500
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 04:52 +0000
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:56 +0100
Re: I did _not_ believe she'd do it. whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2021-10-03 10:14 -0500
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 13:33 -0500
The loans-to-deposits ratio is insane, nothing a banker would want. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-03 11:56 -0700
Re: People like me, who work 30 years on a job, aren't cheating. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:55 -0600
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: "Permies" aren't script kiddies. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 11:35 -0600
My work got done joyously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:28 -0700
Re: My work got done joyously. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:31 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:44 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:50 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:55 -0600
Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 12:15 -0700
Re: Recursion makes good algorithms & bad implementations. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:33 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 17:35 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 22:08 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 00:12 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-03 11:47 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 11:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 20:02 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-03 19:47 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 23:50 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:54 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 00:08 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 05:12 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 01:51 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 06:56 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:28 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 20:18 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-04 07:59 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 13:15 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:37 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 18:58 -0500
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:26 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:57 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:19 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-01 19:22 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:37 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:16 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:44 +0100
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0600
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 09:38 -0500
10 instances of my "C/C++ console" running simultaneously. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 07:51 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:08 -0500
Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 08:03 -0700
Re: Thunderbird can be made to run "right" ( however you want it ). Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:14 -0500
4Re: 1I 5think 2in 5FORTH 1& 7progr 2in 6C/C++ Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-30 08:12 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 18:25 +0000
FORTH, C & C++, in that order, have advantages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-09-30 16:16 -0700
Re: I think in FORTH & program in C/C++. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 21:18 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:07 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:26 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:59 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 10:57 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 12:01 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:04 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 15:03 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:39 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:11 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 20:29 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 17:56 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 21:00 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:03 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 08:06 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 20:23 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 20:11 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 18:21 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-01 20:13 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 09:42 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 12:46 -0600
while(1) Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2021-10-02 11:56 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-02 17:09 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 14:51 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-10-02 21:22 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2021-10-02 15:07 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 20:14 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 08:02 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 15:09 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 00:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-29 11:55 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-29 06:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 11:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-29 19:40 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-09-30 01:43 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-30 07:48 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-29 23:53 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-30 12:06 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:49 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 11:37 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:36 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 09:37 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2021-09-27 09:25 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 09:50 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 18:33 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 11:55 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:43 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2021-09-27 14:51 -0700
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 17:05 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-27 21:31 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 12:57 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-09-28 19:03 +0000
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 15:38 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> - 2021-09-27 21:44 -0400
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 22:50 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-28 13:00 +0100
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-27 20:27 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2021-09-27 23:22 -0500
Re: Linux Crashing rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-09-28 07:42 -0600
Re: Linux Crashing Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-28 05:21 +0000
Page 15 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 12:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sj45ns$spr$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4502 |
On 30/09/2021 07:53, The Starmaker wrote: > What kind of computer runs Windows 95??? A linux computer with VirtualBox -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-28 07:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <irgkr8F94nsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4454 |
On 09/27/2021 10:30 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: > On 9/27/2021 9:21 PM, rbowman wrote: >> >> Is it a separate video card? I've had them go bad. The problem around >> here is none of the stores sell cheap cards. No money in that. > > I don't quite understand what you mean. The video card on this computer > is inside it of course (ATI FirePro). > Quite a few processors integrate the GPU and use system RAM. AMD calls them APUs but some Xeons did the same. A discrete card can have a failing GPU or bad RAM.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-28 11:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sivgcp$hrn$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4460 |
On 9/28/2021 8:49 AM, rbowman wrote: > On 09/27/2021 10:30 PM, Clutterfreak wrote: >> On 9/27/2021 9:21 PM, rbowman wrote: >>> >>> Is it a separate video card? I've had them go bad. The problem around >>> here is none of the stores sell cheap cards. No money in that. >> >> I don't quite understand what you mean. The video card on this computer >> is inside it of course (ATI FirePro). >> > > Quite a few processors integrate the GPU and use system RAM. AMD calls > them APUs but some Xeons did the same. > > A discrete card can have a failing GPU or bad RAM. As far as I know the card on this computer was years newer than the computer itself. It was "almost" new when I purchased the system. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 09:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <aNj4J.59107$jm6.57834@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #4422 |
On 2021-09-27 8:52 a.m., Clutterfreak wrote: > I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than > one minute after each booting. > > Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz > > System type: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor > > Is there another Linux version that'd work without issues on this system? Honestly, I would recommend that you stay away from anything based on Ubuntu. I was a fan of it until I realized that you're going to find a lot more stability with other distributions. Of course, by saying so, I'm also falling into the Linux advocate "trap" of always recommending something else whenever someone faces a problem. -- @RabidHussar Proud LibreOffice and Thunderbird donor Supporter of independent journalism Pure blood John 15:18
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 09:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pOj4J.59108$jm6.23993@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #4422 |
On 2021-09-27 8:52 a.m., Clutterfreak wrote: > I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than > one minute after each booting. > > Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz > > System type: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor > > Is there another Linux version that'd work without issues on this system? I forgot to make an actual recommendation: openSUSE. -- @RabidHussar Proud LibreOffice and Thunderbird donor Supporter of independent journalism Pure blood John 15:18
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 09:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <evk3lgt0rqlm0arrbpja0no5gu9eafus07@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #4422 |
Clutterfreak wrote: >I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than >one minute after each booting. > >Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz > >System type: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor > >Is there another Linux version that'd work without issues on this system? First off: Did it work when running as LiveCD, then fail after installation to HD? -- "Google refuses to admit Linux is a part of its systems." - "Slimer", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6151F64B.6CEE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #4422 |
Clutterfreak wrote: > > I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than > one minute after each booting. > > Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz Xeon???? garbage. > > System type: 64-bit operating system, x64-based processor > > Is there another Linux version that'd work without issues on this system? I would say you have a memory problem and video memory card problem. Replace both. You need more memory. more. no more. more than that. MORE! Xeon???? > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus You know, you can go into your Avast program setting preference and remove "This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software." If you're unable to do dat, wat are you doing fooling around with Linux??? Xeon???? What were you thinking? dats garbage. You first need to learn how to build or buy a desktop computer. your desktop is cluttered with garbage. Xeon???? How much memory do you have installed, 640k? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 18:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sisv8q$qgu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4437 |
On 27/09/2021 17:50, The Starmaker wrote: > Clutterfreak wrote: >> >> I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than >> one minute after each booting. >> >> Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz > > Xeon???? garbage. > It works. It shouldn't crash. Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a desktop. Takes ECC RAM? Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM Wow! I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to get it working as well. My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan has failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it cost... So Mr Clutterfreak Tell us more about where this came from and what state it is in. Does the CPU fan shift air? Does it pass memtest 86? Has it got the correct RAM in it? The good news is that if you find and fix the hardware problem you may well find the installed linux will then run just fine but if the mb or cpu have gone dead, toss it. -- "What do you think about Gay Marriage?" "I don't." "Don't what?" "Think about Gay Marriage."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 11:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <615213BA.5009@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #4438 |
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz???? You can buy that chip on ebay for under twenty dollars!!! and if you look real hard, they'll throw in the whole computer for 20 dollars.... if it doesn't run flight simulator 2020...take it to the back of the barn and shoot it! build this: Intel Core i9-10900K (5.3 GHz, 20 MB cache, 10 cores) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6) 64 GB HyperX DDR4-3200 XMP RGB SDRAM Come on, come on...give it up, How much memory you got now? The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > On 27/09/2021 17:50, The Starmaker wrote: > > Clutterfreak wrote: > >> > >> I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than > >> one minute after each booting. > >> > >> Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz > > > > Xeon???? garbage. > > > It works. It shouldn't crash. > > Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a desktop. > > Takes ECC RAM? > > Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no > spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. > > It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM Wow! > > I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to > get it working as well. > > My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no > longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. > > Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan has > failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. > > Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to > fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next > morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but > so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram > and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it cost... > > So Mr Clutterfreak > Tell us more about where this came from and what state it is in. > Does the CPU fan shift air? > Does it pass memtest 86? > Has it got the correct RAM in it? > > The good news is that if you find and fix the hardware problem you may > well find the installed linux will then run just fine > > but if the mb or cpu have gone dead, toss it. > > -- > "What do you think about Gay Marriage?" > "I don't." > "Don't what?" > "Think about Gay Marriage." -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 15:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sitadk$sp$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4440 |
On 9/27/2021 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz???? You can buy that chip on ebay for under twenty dollars!!! and if you look real hard, they'll throw in the whole computer for 20 dollars.... Yes they sell the CPU used for $12 :-) But don't let that price fool you. It is old but does the job I ask for. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 14:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <61523CF5.5BD0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #4444 |
Clutterfreak wrote: > > On 9/27/2021 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz???? You can buy that chip on ebay for under twenty dollars!!! and if you look real hard, they'll throw in the whole computer for 20 dollars.... > > Yes they sell the CPU used for $12 :-) But don't let that price fool > you. It is old but does the job I ask for. I don't get it, you said: "it crashes less than one minute after each booting." > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 17:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sitf7d$382$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4447 |
On 9/27/2021 4:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Clutterfreak wrote: >> >> On 9/27/2021 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz???? You can buy that chip on ebay for under twenty dollars!!! and if you look real hard, they'll throw in the whole computer for 20 dollars.... >> >> Yes they sell the CPU used for $12 :-) But don't let that price fool >> you. It is old but does the job I ask for. > > I don't get it, you said: "it crashes less than > one minute after each booting." > > > I changed the HD to an earlier one I had from past computers with win10 on it and it works great now. The HD must've gone bad. I'm still not 100% sure it works without problems with Linux. But it is working fine with the other HD and win10. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 21:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87tui5ahh6.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| In reply to | #4438 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: > It works. It shouldn't crash. > > Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a > desktop. This one is a bit long in the tooth but agreed, it should work fine. > Takes ECC RAM? > > Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no > spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. > > It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM Wow! > > I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to > get it working as well. > My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no > longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. > > Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan > has failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. > > Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to > fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next > morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but > so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram > and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it > cost... Other things to think about in an older machine: - excess dust - failure of thermal transfer paste between CPU and heatsink -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-28 12:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <siuvvg$us6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4442 |
On 27/09/2021 21:31, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> It works. It shouldn't crash. >> >> Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a >> desktop. > > This one is a bit long in the tooth but agreed, it should work fine. > >> Takes ECC RAM? >> >> Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no >> spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. >> >> It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM Wow! >> >> I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to >> get it working as well. >> My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no >> longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. >> >> Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan >> has failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. >> >> Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to >> fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next >> morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but >> so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram >> and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it >> cost... > > Other things to think about in an older machine: > - excess dust > - failure of thermal transfer paste between CPU and heatsink > +1 -- It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house for the voice of the kingdom. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-28 19:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vGJ4J.92556$g81.32122@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #4456 |
On 2021-09-28, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 27/09/2021 21:31, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > >> >> Other things to think about in an older machine: >> - excess dust >> - failure of thermal transfer paste between CPU and heatsink > > +1 While you're at it, check your video card too. My machine's display was going blank every day or so; the card's heat sink was full of dust bunnies. I cleaned it a couple of weeks ago and it's been fine ever since. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Life is perverse. \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | It can be beautiful - X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | but it won't. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Lily Tomlin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 15:38 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sita43$pp$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4438 |
On 9/27/2021 12:33 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 27/09/2021 17:50, The Starmaker wrote: >> Clutterfreak wrote: >>> >>> I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than >>> one minute after each booting. >>> >>> Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz >> >> Xeon???? garbage. >> > It works. It shouldn't crash. > > Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a desktop. > > Takes ECC RAM? > > Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no > spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. > > It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM Wow! > > I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to > get it working as well. > > My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no > longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. > > Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan has > failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. > > Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to > fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next > morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but > so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram > and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it cost... > > So Mr Clutterfreak > Tell us more about where this came from and what state it is in. > Does the CPU fan shift air? > Does it pass memtest 86? > Has it got the correct RAM in it? > > The good news is that if you find and fix the hardware problem you may > well find the installed linux will then run just fine > > but if the mb or cpu have gone dead, toss it. > Problem was in HD. I replaced it with my older one with win10 on it and it has started to work fine. All memory sticks (3 sticks of 8g each) work without any problems, and they are error correcting ones. It had win10 on it when I got the computer from craigslist ($75). I kept using it as it was until yesterday morning when it started to make beeping sounds at turn on but with some tries it would boot. Then last night it wouldn't completely boot anymore but I had taken all my programs and stuff off the computer a few hours earlier (just a few folders), so I decided to reinstall the OS to see if that helps, and went for Linux this time cause I don't have a win10 disk. I downloaded mint XFCE and checksumed it against the one on server, then burnt the iso and again checked for possible errors, then installed it. It installed fine but never would proceed past a few tens of seconds after booting was complete. The HD I placed in it is half the capacity of the original but the present 500G is more than I ever need on this computer. I use it just for learning programming and writing hobby programs, mostly to solve some physics question that would require computation. I intend to keep the win10. Will perhaps do something else later with the Linux mint iso disk with one of my other computers. Thanks again for all the information you provided. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RabidHussar <rabid@huss.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 21:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <hsu4J.4015$yk1.2549@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #4443 |
On 2021-09-27 4:38 p.m., Clutterfreak wrote: > On 9/27/2021 12:33 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 27/09/2021 17:50, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Clutterfreak wrote: >>>> >>>> I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than >>>> one minute after each booting. >>>> >>>> Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz >>> >>> Xeon???? garbage. >>> >> It works. It shouldn't crash. >> >> Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a desktop. >> >> Takes ECC RAM? >> >> Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no >> spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. >> >> It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of RAM >> Wow! >> >> I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to >> get it working as well. >> >> My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no >> longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. >> >> Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan >> has failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. >> >> Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used to >> fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the next >> morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had died but >> so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped out the ram >> and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer what it cost... >> >> So Mr Clutterfreak >> Tell us more about where this came from and what state it is in. >> Does the CPU fan shift air? >> Does it pass memtest 86? >> Has it got the correct RAM in it? >> >> The good news is that if you find and fix the hardware problem you may >> well find the installed linux will then run just fine >> >> but if the mb or cpu have gone dead, toss it. >> > > Problem was in HD. I replaced it with my older one with win10 on it and > it has started to work fine. All memory sticks (3 sticks of 8g each) > work without any problems, and they are error correcting ones. > > It had win10 on it when I got the computer from craigslist ($75). I kept > using it as it was until yesterday morning when it started to make > beeping sounds at turn on but with some tries it would boot. Speaking of beeps, the Seagate external HD I _just_ bought like a month ago is already beeping and making an ass of itself. That company can't produce quality no matter what they do. < snip > -- @RabidHussar Proud LibreOffice & Thunderbird donor Supporter of independent journalism Pure blood John 15:18
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 22:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <siu3ec$thd$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #4449 |
On 9/27/2021 8:44 PM, RabidHussar wrote: > On 2021-09-27 4:38 p.m., Clutterfreak wrote: >> On 9/27/2021 12:33 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 27/09/2021 17:50, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> Clutterfreak wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've installed Linux Mint XFCE on my desktop but it crashes less than >>>>> one minute after each booting. >>>>> >>>>> Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @ 3.07GHz 3.06 GHz >>>> >>>> Xeon???? garbage. >>>> >>> It works. It shouldn't crash. >>> >>> Online docs say Xeon should work, but is an unusual choice for a >>> desktop. >>> >>> Takes ECC RAM? >>> >>> Online docs stay X5675 was 2011 chip, now discontinued, so this is no >>> spanking new computer. It's old and may well have 'issues'. >>> >>> It was in its day a $1400 CPU. capable of addressing over 200GB of >>> RAM Wow! >>> >>> I am with clutterfreak. If someone handed me one of those i'd want to >>> get it working as well. >>> >>> My guess is he has an old server that's been tossed out because it no >>> longer works and is too old to be worth fixing. >>> >>> Experience suggest its got dead ram or an iffy processor (if the fan >>> has failed they can cook) or another chip has failed. >>> >>> Mmm I never thought of a dead fan. I had a sparc sent in that used >>> to fail after 20 minutes regular as clockwork, but always booted the >>> next morning. CPU fan had died. Got another one sent in... fan had >>> died but so too had the CPU...wasn't really worth fixing. stripped >>> out the ram and disk and put it in a new one and charged the customer >>> what it cost... >>> >>> So Mr Clutterfreak >>> Tell us more about where this came from and what state it is in. >>> Does the CPU fan shift air? >>> Does it pass memtest 86? >>> Has it got the correct RAM in it? >>> >>> The good news is that if you find and fix the hardware problem you >>> may well find the installed linux will then run just fine >>> >>> but if the mb or cpu have gone dead, toss it. >>> >> >> Problem was in HD. I replaced it with my older one with win10 on it >> and it has started to work fine. All memory sticks (3 sticks of 8g >> each) work without any problems, and they are error correcting ones. >> >> It had win10 on it when I got the computer from craigslist ($75). I >> kept using it as it was until yesterday morning when it started to >> make beeping sounds at turn on but with some tries it would boot. > > Speaking of beeps, the Seagate external HD I _just_ bought like a month > ago is already beeping and making an ass of itself. That company can't > produce quality no matter what they do. > > > Both the bad HD and the older one that works for now are also Seagate :) But internal. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-28 13:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <siv04i$us6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #4443 |
On 27/09/2021 21:38, Clutterfreak wrote: > I intend to keep the win10. Will perhaps do something else later with > the Linux mint iso disk with one of my other computers. > > Thanks again for all the information you provided. Well Ok, I feel marginally vindicated as a corrupted hard drive and linux image was on my list of pissobolities I'd definitely run linux on that one. Bargain at $75. But you are not I....:-) -- It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house for the voice of the kingdom. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-27 20:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <irfcs0F1q8eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #4438 |
On 09/27/2021 11:33 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Does the CPU fan shift air? Does the CPU heat sink look like a mouse's nest? Unless you're in a clean room old boxes have more dust bunnies than live under your bed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.setup
csiph-web