Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #85362
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.unix.geeks, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Mercury |
| Date | 2026-04-04 14:32 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10qr7eq$obab$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <goqdne0QMPjDNVP0nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vko4amxk3s.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <ycGdnZJ5Ypf2SlL0nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <lii5amx5vr.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <10qr0r9$m4tr$7@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In comp.os.linux.misc The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 03/04/2026 20:55, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> The design was done on the block level. Here goes a register, for >> instance. When all is done, next step is replace the blocks with the >> gates components. Another step, replace with the transistors. Finally, >> design the silicon. > > That part is mostly automated. > > The design tools the chip fab people give you include software to allow > block arrangements to be defined I think and then the software > constructs the silicon patterns and calculates delay times and so on. > > In short almost no one designs at the transistor level at all, its all > 'compiled' hardware. For modern hardware, yes. It is almost all VHDL (a programming language for hardware design) or the like, the designer writes code to describe the function, and the VHDL compiler handles most all the nitty gritty details of how to arrange things on the physical chip to get that desired function. For anchient stuff (4004, 8008, 6502) it was almost all direct "hands on", but not in the way that c282724 appears to have have understood from how their posts are written. Even if doing it all by hand, the designers didn't keep "all the individual transistors in mind" at once. The designs were still "chunked" into functional pieces (so one could ignore what was going on inside that black box) to keep the total complexity managable. The only time "all the transistors" might even have been considered was when they go to actually laying out the photomasks by hand on rubylith and even then they very likely only worried about a small area of the rubylith layout at a time and just worked their way along.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-31 20:10 +0000
Re: Mercury Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-03-31 22:03 +0000
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-01 04:37 +0000
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-01 13:26 +0100
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-01 09:03 -0400
Re: Mercury Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-04-01 17:58 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-01 15:16 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-01 21:57 +0200
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-01 20:18 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-02 03:33 +0200
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-01 22:32 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-02 13:51 +0200
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-02 13:33 -0400
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 00:21 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-02 22:51 -0400
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 03:21 +0000
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 14:38 +0200
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 06:22 +0000
Re: Mercury Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-03 07:50 -0700
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 11:13 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 14:33 +0200
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 11:06 -0400
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 16:51 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 14:47 -0400
CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 22:45 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-04 03:27 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-04 04:57 +0000
CPU design "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 22:00 +0200
Re: CPU design c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 16:29 -0400
Re: CPU design "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-04 13:20 +0200
Re: CPU design c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-04 13:57 -0400
Re: CPU design "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-04 22:18 +0200
Re: CPU design Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-05 03:44 +0000
Re: CPU design "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-05 13:58 +0200
Re: CPU design c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-05 17:19 -0400
Re: CPU design The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 12:42 +0100
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 21:57 +0000
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 17:54 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 22:29 -0400
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-04 04:58 +0000
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-04 13:30 +0100
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-04 13:46 -0400
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-04 19:22 +0000
Re: Mercury Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-04-04 20:39 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-04 18:10 -0400
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-05 03:31 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-05 17:13 -0400
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-05 03:59 +0000
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-04 19:09 +0000
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-04 14:26 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-04 13:50 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 21:55 +0200
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-04 13:40 +0100
Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-04 14:32 +0000
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-04 18:44 +0200
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-04 19:02 +0000
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 12:17 +0100
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-05 13:59 +0200
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-05 13:10 +0100
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-05 19:50 +0200
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-05 22:02 +0000
Re: Mercury Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-05 17:01 -0700
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-06 02:05 +0000
Mandriva was Re: Mercury Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-05 21:18 -0700
Re: Mandriva was Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-06 16:02 +0000
Re: Mandriva was Re: Mercury Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-06 18:09 +0000
Re: Mandriva was Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-07 02:15 +0000
Re: Mandriva was Re: Mercury Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-04-06 14:53 -0700
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-06 11:01 +0100
CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 10:43 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 19:44 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-02 15:06 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:32 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 23:58 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 15:11 +0200
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-02 14:56 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 15:31 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-02 22:46 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 07:03 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 11:25 +0100
The New Feudalism Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-04-03 06:33 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 10:47 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:04 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 12:29 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 10:35 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-03 07:00 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 11:27 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-04-03 13:54 -0700
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-03 22:54 +0200
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 03:45 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-04-03 18:10 +0000
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-03 15:04 -0400
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:13 +0100
Re: CPU architecture (was Re: Mercury) Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-04-03 00:29 +0000
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 19:50 +0000
Re: Mercury Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-04-02 20:53 +0000
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-03 10:51 +0100
Re: Mercury The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-04-02 11:15 +0100
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 00:12 +0000
Re: Mercury rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-04-02 00:28 +0000
Re: Mercury c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-04-01 21:39 -0400
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-02 14:17 +0200
Re: Mercury "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-04-01 14:47 +0200
csiph-web