Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. |
| Date | 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <tfkmma$1tlch$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <jo1i9uFlo3oU1@mid.individual.net> <e3e1422d-f2e5-4061-a8d3-19229162cd8fn@googlegroups.com> <1t631daf5fi3d132an3e8%sfroehli@Froehlich.Priv.at> <jo5rhsFd5beU1@mid.individual.net> <1py4gw9.rgyq0pl35xnzN@marc.my-fqdn.de> |
On 11/09/2022 13:46, Marc Stibane wrote:
> Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> wrote:
>> Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) writes:
>>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:55:04 Ulf Kutzner wrote:
>
>>>> Die Sache ist ambivalent. Man schaue sich an, wer im Vereinigten
>>>> Königreich die Thronreden schreibt bzw. vorlegt.
>>> Die Queen selbst sagte zu dem Thema "my first prime minister
>>> was...", hatte da also eine klare Vorstellung bezüglich der
>>> Hierarchie :-)
>> Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass die Queen die Prime Minister ernannt
>> hat und nicht umgekehrt.
>
> Wer krönte die Queen? Der Erzbischof von Canterbury. Der stand also in
> der Hierarchie darüber.
>
> ;-)
>
Moooment.... Der macht es ja nur im Auftrag von Gott ... also er ist nur
Erfüllungsgehilfe.
--
Cheers,
G.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
---------------------------->8------------------------------
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML e-mail
/ \
---------------------------->8------------------------------
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-08 17:54 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 19:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ned Kelly <ned.kelly@nefkom.net> - 2022-09-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 20:17 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-09-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 01:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-11 09:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 14:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 09:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:22 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-12 19:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 04:05 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:44 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-12 19:44 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-13 11:27 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 10:03 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2022-09-10 00:45 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:47 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-09-10 19:13 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:52 +0200
csiph-web