Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. |
| Date | 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jnuqadF6968U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tfd6nj$p3u1$1@dont-email.me> <218c496b-ec02-4626-bdbb-8994496d53c4n@googlegroups.com> <2DCA6B559454664B@ggruber793.news.solani.org> <6768ad41-47da-408a-973b-b05ccfa09aacn@googlegroups.com> <707C50A54DC4178B@ggruber793.news.solani.org> |
Am 08.09.2022 um 20:17 schrieb Georg Gruber: > Am 08.09.2022 um 19:55 schrieb Herwig: >> 2022-09-08 19:55:00 +0200 >> >>> ... >> >>> The Queen is dead, long live the King, whichever. >> >> Und "Extra 3" fällt aus - wetten? > > Wäre eine verpasste Gelegenheit, so richtig profan vom Leder zu ziehen > (von wegen de mortuis nil nisi bene, gepfiffen drauf), man wird sehen. > Ich bin im deutschen TV nicht so drin, wer kniet denn weniger, ARD oder > ZDF? ZDF sendet noch seine TV-Komödie "Lehrer kann jeder", ARD lässt den Krimi "Nord bei Nordwest" für eine 45minütige Brennpunkt-Sendung ausfallen und zieht dann Panorama auf 21 Uhr statt 21.45 vor. extra 3 und Inas Nacht stehen im Videotext noch drin, das anfängliche Chaos dort besteht aber noch ... -- Johannes Leckebusch - AR3 https://johannes-leckebusch.de/ https://johannes-leckebusch.de/Fotogalerien/index.html https://foto.ungruen.de/index2.html https://flickr.com/photos/johannes_leckebusch/
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-08 17:54 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 19:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ned Kelly <ned.kelly@nefkom.net> - 2022-09-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 20:17 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-09-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 01:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-11 09:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 14:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 09:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:22 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-12 19:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 04:05 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:44 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-12 19:44 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-13 11:27 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 10:03 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2022-09-10 00:45 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:47 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-09-10 19:13 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:52 +0200
csiph-web