Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. |
| Date | 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jo5rhsFd5beU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tfd6nj$p3u1$1@dont-email.me> <1k142zzudlaqw$.1hvw5q4e4yv90$.dlg@40tude.net> <jo1i9uFlo3oU1@mid.individual.net> <e3e1422d-f2e5-4061-a8d3-19229162cd8fn@googlegroups.com> <1t631daf5fi3d132an3e8%sfroehli@Froehlich.Priv.at> |
Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) writes: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:55:04 Ulf Kutzner wrote: >> Michael Bode schrieb am Freitag, 9. September 2022 um 21:25:51 UTC+2: >>> Frank Hucklenbroich <huckle...@gmx.net> writes: >>> > Gestern sagte jemand im Fernsehen, sie war Königin unter >>> > Winston Churchill, der 1875 geboren wurde, und unter Liz Truss, >>> > Jahrgang 1975. > >>> Unter? Das bezweifle ich. > >> Die Sache ist ambivalent. Man schaue sich an, wer im Vereinigten >> Königreich die Thronreden schreibt bzw. vorlegt. > > Die Queen selbst sagte zu dem Thema "my first prime minister > was...", hatte da also eine klare Vorstellung bezüglich der > Hierarchie :-) Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass die Queen die Prime Minister ernannt hat und nicht umgekehrt. -- "Die Abwesenheit von Evidenz zur Wirksamkeit ist keine Evidenz für die Abwesenheit von Wirksamkeit." - Der Grünen-Gesundheitsexperte Janosch Dahmen.
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-08 17:54 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 19:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ned Kelly <ned.kelly@nefkom.net> - 2022-09-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 20:17 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-09-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 01:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-11 09:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 14:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 09:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:22 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-12 19:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 04:05 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:44 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-12 19:44 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-13 11:27 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 10:03 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2022-09-10 00:45 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:47 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-09-10 19:13 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:52 +0200
csiph-web