Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. |
| Date | 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <jo65agFe908U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <jo1i9uFlo3oU1@mid.individual.net> <e3e1422d-f2e5-4061-a8d3-19229162cd8fn@googlegroups.com> <1t631daf5fi3d132an3e8%sfroehli@Froehlich.Priv.at> <jo5rhsFd5beU1@mid.individual.net> <1py4gw9.rgyq0pl35xnzN@marc.my-fqdn.de> |
spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) writes: > Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> wrote: >> Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) writes: >>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:55:04 Ulf Kutzner wrote: > >>>> Die Sache ist ambivalent. Man schaue sich an, wer im Vereinigten >>>> Königreich die Thronreden schreibt bzw. vorlegt. >>> Die Queen selbst sagte zu dem Thema "my first prime minister >>> was...", hatte da also eine klare Vorstellung bezüglich der >>> Hierarchie :-) >> Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass die Queen die Prime Minister ernannt >> hat und nicht umgekehrt. > > Wer krönte die Queen? Der Erzbischof von Canterbury. Der stand also in > der Hierarchie darüber. Die Queen war aber das Oberhaupt der Church of England. Die Ernennung eines Erzbischofs von Canterbury ließ sie durch ihren Premierminister erledigen. So einfach ist das also nicht. -- "Die Abwesenheit von Evidenz zur Wirksamkeit ist keine Evidenz für die Abwesenheit von Wirksamkeit." - Der Grünen-Gesundheitsexperte Janosch Dahmen.
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-08 17:54 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 19:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ned Kelly <ned.kelly@nefkom.net> - 2022-09-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 20:17 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-09-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 01:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-11 09:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 14:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 09:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:22 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-12 19:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 04:05 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:44 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-12 19:44 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-13 11:27 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 10:03 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2022-09-10 00:45 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:47 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-09-10 19:13 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:52 +0200
csiph-web