Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8809
| From | Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: on keep providing python 2 packages |
| Date | 2016-08-21 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s8HnQ-510-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <s7VMd-8wb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8hD4-5qC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8jOy-6X7-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8l3X-7Jw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8n5L-vL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
FWIW, On Aug 21, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >* all Python applications that support it, should use 3.X only *now* > (and do not bother with things like alternatives or "-3" suffixes / > "python3-" prefixes - at least for new packages; I'd even slowly start > removing alternatives, if it doesn't affect users), +1 >* libraries in Stretch should support 2.X (i.e. add python-foo binary > packages) if that doesn't require too much additional work (py2dsp > still creates them). I'm OK with shipping 3.X only packages in NEW > packages, though. I'd not encourage people to do so but also not > forbid it, I'd also say that it isn't worth *removing* Python 2.x support right now, unless of course upstream drops it first. >* we shouldn't accept 2.X only packages in Buster (Stretch+1, released ~2019) > unless they're a dependency of other packages, and start shipping 3.X only > packages where it makes sense (and I hope that decision will be mostly made > by upstreams by simply dropping 2.X support). We can drop some 2.X packages > (problematic to maintain? better alternatives available? low popcon?), but > do not do a mass removal yet, +1 >* for Bullseye (Stretch+2, released ~2021) we should start dropping 2.X > packages, and maybe even remove 2.X interpreter, +1 - remember that this will be 10-11 years after 2.7 was released! >* Bullseye + 1 (~2023) is the one without 2.X interpreter and > python-foo packages for sure (and without /usr/bin/python symlink or > at least without Debian packages mentioning it, there should be a rule > to not speak about /usr/bin/python symlink! ;) +1 >Note that Python upstream will stop supporting 2.X in ~2020 so about one >year (and a half?) after releasing Buster. As you point out, upstream will stop supporting Python 2.7 for normal bug fixes in 2020, although I suspect it will be supported in security-fix source-only mode for some years after that. There has not be an official announcement of that IIRC, and PEP 373 doesn't describe that, so it's just my opinion. Cheers, -Barry
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 09:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Olivier Sallou <olivier.sallou@irisa.fr> - 2016-08-19 09:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2016-08-19 10:10 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 11:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:20 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 13:00 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 19:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 18:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 21:10 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 22:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 09:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 22:20 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "Elena ``of Valhalla''" <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 15:30 +0200
csiph-web