Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8803
| From | Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: on keep providing python 2 packages |
| Date | 2016-08-20 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s8jOy-6X7-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <s7MpB-2B9-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Px7-4vo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7PGN-4yC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7VMd-8wb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8hD4-5qC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> anyway, why wouldnt you want to provide a python2 package if the code
> supports it? if you got a py3k package working, it's usually
> straightforward to have a py pkg. Doing that i've found several issues
> with upsteam projects that were fixed, thus increasing the general
> quality of their code and our distribution
my opinion:
it just makes no sense to discuss this now:
+ it's less than 6 months from the freeze
+ I doubt that there will be that many "affected packages" right now,
much less that many "buggy" (by your proposal) indroced in the next
few months; I don't recall seeing any example in any email.
+ I very much hope we'll manage to get buster out without python2, in
that case thinking about shipping py2 modules now when we're going to
drop them next year would be a plain waste of time.
I'm curious: what triggered this email of yours?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 09:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Olivier Sallou <olivier.sallou@irisa.fr> - 2016-08-19 09:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2016-08-19 10:10 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 11:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:20 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 13:00 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 19:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 18:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 21:10 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 22:30 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 09:50 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 22:20 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "Elena ``of Valhalla''" <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:40 +0200
Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 15:30 +0200
csiph-web