Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8809

Re: on keep providing python 2 packages

Path csiph.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: on keep providing python 2 packages
Date Sun, 21 Aug 2016 22:20:02 +0200
Message-ID <s8HnQ-510-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <s7MpB-2B9-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7Px7-4vo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7PGN-4yC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <s7VMd-8wb-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8hD4-5qC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8jOy-6X7-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8l3X-7Jw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <s8n5L-vL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Aug 21 20:18:18 2016
Old-Return-Path <barry@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-11.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5
Organization The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/raky+5Nvm0O9i0Vv0ku5HTk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14150
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160821161802.7d5cbd9e@subdivisions.wooz.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 86
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:18:02 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <20160821161802.7d5cbd9e@subdivisions.wooz.org>
X-Original-References <CAB4XWXz5oDCwHKVzR3EcETUwA3383Bamnj4u98DEQ97VaBz1-w@mail.gmail.com> <20160819104252.iongmlrtnsxiwlcu@mitya57.me> <CAB4XWXxuyRATGpxHKHxy0iDcPuBOS8AKOM8arr=Ph=LyLi54gA@mail.gmail.com> <20160819172654.jqrm6ntegcqyalmu@mitya57.me> <CAB4XWXyGKveWoNV7LcQApBwHxBcenSrG7O7fHc8RR5QcfyZQLA@mail.gmail.com> <20160820190551.cz2v5myvnmszfnd3@chase.mapreri.org> <CAB4XWXxEYF+rzi=VtKC9oFo8n_yBPNksuqnbh6EuA4mOqFuCvQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160820223042.pde6vi32axlu5x5w@p1otr.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8809

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

FWIW,

On Aug 21, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:

>* all Python applications that support it, should use 3.X only *now*
>  (and do not bother with things like alternatives or "-3" suffixes /
>  "python3-" prefixes - at least for new packages; I'd even slowly start
>  removing alternatives, if it doesn't affect users),

+1

>* libraries in Stretch should support 2.X (i.e. add python-foo binary
>  packages) if that doesn't require too much additional work (py2dsp
>  still creates them). I'm OK with shipping 3.X only packages in NEW
>  packages, though. I'd not encourage people to do so but also not
>  forbid it,

I'd also say that it isn't worth *removing* Python 2.x support right now,
unless of course upstream drops it first.

>* we shouldn't accept 2.X only packages in Buster (Stretch+1, released ~2019)
>  unless they're a dependency of other packages, and start shipping 3.X only
>  packages where it makes sense (and I hope that decision will be mostly made
>  by upstreams by simply dropping 2.X support). We can drop some 2.X packages
>  (problematic to maintain? better alternatives available? low popcon?), but
>  do not do a mass removal yet,

+1

>* for Bullseye (Stretch+2, released ~2021) we should start dropping 2.X
>  packages, and maybe even remove 2.X interpreter,

+1 - remember that this will be 10-11 years after 2.7 was released!

>* Bullseye + 1 (~2023) is the one without 2.X interpreter and
>  python-foo packages for sure (and without /usr/bin/python symlink or
>  at least without Debian packages mentioning it, there should be a rule
>  to not speak about /usr/bin/python symlink! ;)

+1

>Note that Python upstream will stop supporting 2.X in ~2020 so about one
>year (and a half?) after releasing Buster.

As you point out, upstream will stop supporting Python 2.7 for normal bug
fixes in 2020, although I suspect it will be supported in security-fix
source-only mode for some years after that.  There has not be an official
announcement of that IIRC, and PEP 373 doesn't describe that, so it's just my
opinion.

Cheers,
-Barry

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 09:30 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Olivier Sallou <olivier.sallou@irisa.fr> - 2016-08-19 09:50 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Ondrej Novy <novy@ondrej.org> - 2016-08-19 10:10 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 11:50 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:20 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 12:50 +0200
    Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 13:00 +0200
      Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 19:30 +0200
        Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 18:50 +0200
          Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 21:10 +0200
            Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-20 22:30 +0200
              Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
              Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 00:40 +0200
                Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 09:50 +0200
                Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-21 22:20 +0200
    Re: on keep providing python 2 packages "Elena ``of Valhalla''" <elena.valhalla@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 13:40 +0200
  Re: on keep providing python 2 packages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-19 15:30 +0200

csiph-web