Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #165852

Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish

From Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish
Date 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100
Message-ID <rfGSe-58C-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rePEe-1Gu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfzH4-h4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfDhE-2E4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfDKH-34K-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 03/22/2016 04:14 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 22 March 2016 18:43:54 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > > What do I put in /etc/apt/sources.list to gain access to the newer
>
> > > one?
>
> >
>
> > So far as I can see, you can't, not in Wheezy. The one you have is
>
> > the most recent available via the repo.
>
> > http://mozilla.debian.net/
>
> >
>
> > You could always use Firefox, as is now recommended. For instructions
>
> > see the hyperlink I have referenced. That will give you 45.0.1.
>
> >
>
> > You could presumably download iceweasel_44.0.2-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb and
>
> > install it with dpkg -i, but why? If Debian and Mozilla have made up,
>
> > why not just accept it and use Firefox as Debian is now telling you to
>
> > do? It takes a bit of getting used to, but why perpetuate a quarrel
>
> > which is over?
>
> >
>
> > Lisi
>
> It went to the mozilla site and pilled 45.0.1 but it was a tar.bz2, 
> which when unpacked, did not have an installer script that I could find.
>
> It looks to be prebuilt and ready to rock & roll, but where, and with 
> what utility do I install it with?
>
> Next?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> -- 
>
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
>
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
>
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
For Mozilla's tarballs you don't need anything to install it, other than 
tar and bzip2.  Put the tarball wherever you like, the use the command:

     tar -jxvf firefox-45.0.1.tar.bz2

this will unzip and untar everything into a directory named firefox.  
You can leave the firefox directory there, or rename it, or move it 
wherever you want to.  Inside that directory are two executable files, 
firefox and firefox-bin.  Either one of these will start firefox.  They 
are usually a few bytes different in size, but both seem to work the 
same as far as I can tell.

BTW, the URL

https://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-latest&os=linux64&lang=en-US

will do a download of the latest firefox, and

https://download.mozilla.org/?product=thunderbird-latest&os=linux64&lang=en-US

will do the same for Thunderbird, which can be installed in the same manner.

Whether you want to install Firefox and Thunderbird this way, or not, is 
up to you.  There should be debian packages for Firefox, now.  I'm not 
sure about Thunderbird.  I have been installing them this way ever since 
the Debian/Mozilla debates began.  This way I know that I always have 
the most current version of each of these packages.

Marc

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 18:50 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 19:50 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
        Stupid ERRATUM was Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:20 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 23:40 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 00:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-21 05:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 09:50 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:20 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 01:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Frank McCormick <debianlist@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-21 17:10 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 02:10 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 18:20 +0100
            Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
              Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386  now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 00:20 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386  now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 03:30 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100

csiph-web