Re: x86_64 vs i386

From	Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: x86_64 vs i386
Date	2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
Message-ID	<rfzH4-h4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rePEe-1Gu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfiZz-5r7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfy8i-7MX-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday 22 March 2016 13:17:26 Lisi Reisz wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 March 2016 01:04:44 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday 21 March 2016 19:27:11 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 March 2016 15:54:33 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > You haven't noticed there have been no updates to the 32 bit
> > > > stuff in quite a while?
> > >
> > > Quote at the end of last week from form a client of mine who runs
> > > a 32 bit computer (Debian 7 and TDE 3.5.13.2):
> > > <quote>
> > > My computer is telling me I have 75 updates available.
> > > Perhaps we could do that at some point.
> > > We are involved with the Musical Festival this week, so no rush!
> > > </quote>
> > >
> > > No updates???
> >
> > Correct, no updates to iceweasel despite a growing list of exploits.
>
> The most recent Iceweasel update arrived this Sunday at 22.04.36 GMT. 
> (See below)  You can see the GMT time arrival time of your email
> above:  Tuesday 01:04:44.  So no new update in 27 hours and 6 seconds.
>  You and I have different definitions of "quite a while".
>
> Lisi
>
> <quote>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>--- Debian Security Advisory DSA-3523-1                  
> security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/                  
>     Moritz Muehlenhoff March 20, 2016                       
> https://www.debian.org/security/faq -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>---
>
> Package        : iceweasel
> CVE ID         : not available
>
> This update disables the Graphite font shaping library in Iceweasel,
> Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser.
>
> For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
> in version 38.7.1esr-1~deb7u1.
>
> For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
> version 38.7.1esr-1~deb8u1.
>
> For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
> version 45.0.1esr-1 of the firefox-esr source package.
>
> We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.

Tell me how girl. Mine highest numbered version 
in /var/cache/apt/archives is dated Feb 14 for a 44.0.x.bpo, but the 
installed one I put back in yesterday from the repos is a 37.7.1, whose 
date is indeed yesterday.  It seems to be working, but why is it not the 
newer version?

ls -l output of archives:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39445644 Mar 18 22:45 
iceweasel_38.7.1esr-1~deb7u1_i386.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42916910 Feb 14 18:13 
iceweasel_44.0.2-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb

It seems to me I ought to be looking at an about screen that says 
44.0.2-1.

What do I put in /etc/apt/sources.list to gain access to the newer one?

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Thread

x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 18:50 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 19:50 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
        Stupid ERRATUM was Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:20 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 23:40 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 00:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-21 05:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 09:50 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:20 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 01:10 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Frank McCormick <debianlist@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0100
  Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
    Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-21 17:10 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100
      Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
        Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 02:10 +0100
          Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 18:20 +0100
            Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
              Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386  now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 00:20 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386  now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 03:30 +0100
                Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100

csiph-web