Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165799
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: x86_64 vs i386 |
| Date | 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rffS2-34o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rePEe-1Gu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfaz0-86k-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rffp0-2Sa-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 21 March 2016 17:09:52 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:08:15 The Wanderer wrote: > > On 2016-03-21 at 11:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday 21 March 2016 10:50:33 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > >>> But now all the browser coders have thrown i386 machines under > > >>> the bus, and I'm apparently stuck with the broken i386 stuff > > >>> left behind. > > >> > > >> What do you mean by that? > > >> > > >> > > >> Stefan "who still uses 32bit userland pretty much everywhere" > > > > > > You haven't noticed there have been no updates to the 32 bit stuff > > > in quite a while? > > > > Where? > > > > You confirmed in another mail that you're referring (at least in > > part) to the chromium package, and to an apparent decision by Google > > upstream to drop 32-bit support in Chrome. (I haven't heard of this > > elsewhere AFAIK, but it wouldn't entirely surprise me.) > > > > The version of chromium:i386 in testing is the same as the version > > of chromium:amd64 in testing (49.0.2623.87-1), and the chromium > > binary from the latter package is timestamped March 9th, so it's > > less than two weeks old. > > > > Am I looking in the wrong places, or do we just have significantly > > different definitions of "quite a while"? > > No, its far more likely that because this system says its a 32 bit > system, google is refusing to show me the amd64 version. But I need ti > figure out how to re-install the 32 bit iceweasel because thats what > my bank expects, unless someone can tell me how to import the > iceweasel saved site list and passwds into Chromium. > > Cheers, Gene Heskett PS: That problem is solved, I found dpkg's arch file & nuked the amd64 entry. iceweasel is now reinstalled and all my links and pws are restored. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 19:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Stupid ERRATUM was Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 23:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 00:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-21 05:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 09:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 01:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Frank McCormick <debianlist@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-21 17:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 02:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 18:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 00:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 03:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100
csiph-web