Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165847
| From | Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: x86_64 vs i386 |
| Date | 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfDhE-2E4-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rePEe-1Gu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfy8i-7MX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rfzH4-h4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday 22 March 2016 18:54:30 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 13:17:26 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 01:04:44 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday 21 March 2016 19:27:11 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Monday 21 March 2016 15:54:33 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > > You haven't noticed there have been no updates to the 32 bit > > > > > stuff in quite a while? > > > > > > > > Quote at the end of last week from form a client of mine who runs > > > > a 32 bit computer (Debian 7 and TDE 3.5.13.2): > > > > <quote> > > > > My computer is telling me I have 75 updates available. > > > > Perhaps we could do that at some point. > > > > We are involved with the Musical Festival this week, so no rush! > > > > </quote> > > > > > > > > No updates??? > > > > > > Correct, no updates to iceweasel despite a growing list of exploits. > > > > The most recent Iceweasel update arrived this Sunday at 22.04.36 GMT. > > (See below) You can see the GMT time arrival time of your email > > above: Tuesday 01:04:44. So no new update in 27 hours and 6 seconds. > > You and I have different definitions of "quite a while". > > > > Lisi > > > > <quote> > > - > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--- Debian Security Advisory DSA-3523-1 > > security@debian.org https://www.debian.org/security/ > > Moritz Muehlenhoff March 20, 2016 > > https://www.debian.org/security/faq - > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >--- > > > > Package : iceweasel > > CVE ID : not available > > > > This update disables the Graphite font shaping library in Iceweasel, > > Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser. > > > > For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed > > in version 38.7.1esr-1~deb7u1. > > > > For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in > > version 38.7.1esr-1~deb8u1. > > > > For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in > > version 45.0.1esr-1 of the firefox-esr source package. > > > > We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages. > > Tell me how girl. Mine highest numbered version > in /var/cache/apt/archives is dated Feb 14 for a 44.0.x.bpo, but the > installed one I put back in yesterday from the repos is a 37.7.1, whose > date is indeed yesterday. It seems to be working, but why is it not the > newer version? > > ls -l output of archives: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39445644 Mar 18 22:45 > iceweasel_38.7.1esr-1~deb7u1_i386.deb > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 42916910 Feb 14 18:13 > iceweasel_44.0.2-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb > > It seems to me I ought to be looking at an about screen that says > 44.0.2-1. > > What do I put in /etc/apt/sources.list to gain access to the newer one? So far as I can see, you can't, not in Wheezy. The one you have is the most recent available via the repo. http://mozilla.debian.net/ You could always use Firefox, as is now recommended. For instructions see the hyperlink I have referenced. That will give you 45.0.1. You could presumably download iceweasel_44.0.2-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb and install it with dpkg -i, but why? If Debian and Mozilla have made up, why not just accept it and use Firefox as Debian is now telling you to do? It takes a bit of getting used to, but why perpetuate a quarrel which is over? Lisi
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 19:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Stupid ERRATUM was Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 23:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 00:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-21 05:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 09:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 01:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Frank McCormick <debianlist@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-21 17:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 02:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 18:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 00:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 03:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100
csiph-web