Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165862
| From | Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: x86_64 vs i386 |
| Date | 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfMXF-1bN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rePEe-1Gu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rePNW-1K2-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Free Software Foundation |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:52:03 +0100 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> wrote: > On 03/20/2016 06:45 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks > > for some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine. > > But its not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, and no > > currently installed 32 bit application has a problem. > > > > But now all the browser coders have thrown i386 machines under the > > bus, and I'm apparently stuck with the broken i386 stuff left > > behind. > > > > How can I convince the package managers to search for x86_64 stuff > > in the repos and install it. > > Since you are using a backports 3.16 kernel, I assume you are using > Wheezy, which already understands Multi-Arch. In that case, just do > > dpkg --add-architecture amd64 He appears to already have amd64 enabled- hence his ability to run an amd64 kernel. He also speaks of manually specifying amd64 package installation, implying he already has that architecture enabled- his problem is the fact that installing amd64 versions of all his binaries would result in him losing all his i386 binaries. Synaptic thinks he has an i386 machine post amd64 installation.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 19:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Stupid ERRATUM was Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2016-03-20 19:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-23 10:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-20 20:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2016-03-20 23:40 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 00:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2016-03-21 05:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 09:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-21 18:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 01:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Frank McCormick <debianlist@videotron.ca> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-03-21 16:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 17:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2016-03-21 17:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-21 22:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 00:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 02:10 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 18:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-22 20:00 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 23:50 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 00:20 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-23 03:30 +0100
Re: x86_64 vs i386 now firefoxish Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 03:40 +0100
csiph-web