Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #510969

Re: Why Still Old Framework?

From Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Why Still Old Framework?
Date 2015-08-03 16:27 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <pan.2015.08.03.16.27.28@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <mpgge6$cbr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.08.01.02.21.54@localhost.localdomain> <mpm390$a9b$1@speranza.aioe.org> <pan.2015.08.03.12.41.00@localhost.localdomain> <mpnrml$nsr$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:53:56 +0200, Poutnik wrote:

> 
>  even passing the exams with best marks.
> 

That's all that matters.

In American post-grad schools, or at least the best ones, the
"student" is rigorously examined on his knowledge and how he
acquired that knowledge is irrelevant.

Hence, no required coursework.

Now, all this fine education still has to be measured and paid
for (like meat at the butcher shop).  In post-grad school they
keep track of credit hours but they will employ a "catch all"
category called Graduate Research to account for the activity
of the "student."  In fact, on my own official post-grad transcripts
there is only one entry repeated over and over: Graduate Research.

Odd Ball must have received his "formal training" at some
fifth-rate fly-by-night diploma mill and he mistakingly
assumes that his experience is definitive.


>
> Or, there is possible other explanation
> that my country had better education level at my time
> than US education system now.
>

I'd believe it.  In the US, at the undergrad level, football
is supreme and all those who strive for truth and the expansion
of knowledge are accused of being mentally deranged (check
with Odd Ball for the specific technique).

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why Still Old Framework? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-07-30 20:09 +0000
  Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 20:29 -0500
    Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 16:51 -0500
  Re: Why Still Old Framework? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-01 02:23 +0000
    Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 16:49 -0500
      Re: Why Still Old Framework? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-03 12:42 +0000
        Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 08:51 -0500
          Re: Why Still Old Framework? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-03 16:52 +0000
            Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 12:01 -0500
        Re: Why Still Old Framework? Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 15:53 +0200
          Re: Why Still Old Framework? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 09:14 -0500
            Re: Why Still Old Framework? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 09:08 -0700
          Re: Why Still Old Framework? Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-03 16:27 +0000
  Re: time is not spatial per se (only if the flipbook store was closed Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-08-01 02:50 +0000
    pollution per se noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 14:21 -0700
      Re: pollution per se noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 21:05 -0700
  Re: Why Still Old Framework? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-01 06:45 -0400
  Re: Why Still Old Framework? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-02 00:12 -0700

csiph-web