Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #276621
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes |
| References | (3 earlier) <1d42ddd5704e94ae474ba046db8ec2bb@dizum.com> <op.x5apk6m1tm21m2@benson.localhost> <40e47634b06c4e42e3b552f0b761aa9c@dizum.com> <op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> <9da82a59334aa06844031bed9f803b1d@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of > 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as > sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did > thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > <------------- >> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > <------------- >>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond >>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW. > <------------- >>>> yep.. i can't figure it out. you aer so smort. > <------------- >>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted. > <------------- >> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux sysadmins >> with 2 decades of experience don't use perl. uh-huh. > > Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program > running, and is all pissed about it. yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy. LOL > If you were able to get the Perl > program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that > the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather > is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL > >>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis. > <------------- >>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that >>>> nobody >>>> likes? > <------------- >>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider. > <------------- >> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of, >> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath. > > Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it > something I said that set you off? LOL was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of your wife and kids? > >>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them. > <------------- >> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb. i was the only person in >> my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school. > > Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the > room, by his own admission. LOL i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing cock and anal sex unprompted, you were. > >>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper >>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't >>> even know copper burns green. > <------------- >> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry. in fact, i know absolutely >> nothing, so you win. that was easy. > > Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL awesome. i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you needed it more than me. > >>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might >>>>>> signify "nothing". > <------------- >>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you >>>>> "moron". >>>>> LOL > <------------- >>>> you sure seem to be "happy". > <------------- >>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL > <------------- >> why would i act smart? > > It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL that would be stupid of me. > >> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart. > > Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'? > Vince Lamb? exactly. > Stooopid kook. LOL yes they are. > >> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid >> people. > > No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you > were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL huh? > >>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond >>>>>> "something >>>>>> made out of bricks". > <------------- >>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet. > <------------- >>>> no i'm not. > <------------- >>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting >>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you. > <------------- >> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity. i come here >> to >> waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish >> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of >> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been >> invested >> in for years and years. > > I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the > best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy > meltdowns. LOL LOL > >>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them, DildoRider. >>>>> You are, after all, a libtard. > <------------- >>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal? > <------------- >>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional. >>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions. >>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it. >>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant. > <------------- >> only four? seems petty. > > Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with > liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be > succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little > psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/ http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830 > >>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up >>>>> with >>>>> him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine? > <------------- >>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the >>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew >>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit. > <------------- >>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a >>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard >>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones >>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977 >>> hovel. > <------------- >> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey. you ought >> to know that. > > Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too > fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation > potential. LOL also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's houses. surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove your now-vaporized bluster. > >> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do. free clue: one >> of >> my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that there >> "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a >> lot >> of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days quite >> wealthy. better get to work! >> >> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname. > > So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called > "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the > clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and > you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying > bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL the fanfic is strong with this one. > >> that should keep you busy googling for a while... > > No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being > rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL > >>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on >>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout. > <------------- >> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling children > > Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL i said "family", not parents. you got a reading problem? > >> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to >> solve >> all of my problems. > > Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those > dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't > afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL more fanfic involving dildos from fakey. > >> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care >> of everything for them, do you? you seem to think that's how it works >> for everybody, for some reason. just wondering where you're getting >> your "data". > <------------- >> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents. > LOL > >> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the >> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative >> what >> happens in real life? i told you that those numbers were not correct. >> i >> told you that my parents are both retired. your little stalkyStats are >> just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i >> must >> say. > > Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you > all upset? LOL "was it something i said" lame is noted. the numbers even said that they were statistical averages. you don't read that far, though. what's about $200k times 35 years? do the math, dummy. now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options... add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments... calculate the values of the classic cars... you sure are a simpleton. > >>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's >>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've >>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that the >>> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely >>> increased by the rising real estate market... > > And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance > and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even > with the price appreciation. LOL did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15 years? > >> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more >> important than someone's perceived quality of life. > > You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a > half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that > the best you could afford? LOL 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full basement isn't enough for me? don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year old mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here from 1912 until probably around the great depression. it seems to befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice area. > >>> a rising level in the toilet bowl lifts all turds, you know. Too bad >>> it couldn't even keep up with inflation. > <------------- >> i bought it to live in, not to flip or give to my snot-nosed kid, >> genius. > > Said kid which you'll never have... you're gay. You've admitted it. > LOL you win. > >> i like a roof over my head where i can do whatever the hell i want >> without >> shifty landlord or homeowner's association rules and i'm willing to pay >> for it. > > And pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it, and pay for it... > there comes a point when you must realize you've made a bad choice... > or perhaps not. You *are* pretty retarded. LOL you know, i was thinking about that while playing my drums at midnight with nothing to worry about. > >> what was your first house like, fakey? something you wouldn't even want >> to live in so you rented it out to some poor sap? > > You're comparing apples to oranges, DildoRider. I went out on my own > when I was 18 you beat me by 2 years. > and in a very short time I was financially set. what does that have to do with your first house? > You've > been out on your own for what, 20 years now? And you're *still* in > your "first house". last house, maybe. i like it here. > How long are you gonna use the excuse of "I'm just > starting out!"... until you retire? LOL have you ever been content? like, even once? > >>>>> I note they're pretty quiet lately. > <------------- >>>> maybe they gave up dealing with a sociopath hiding behind a remailer. > <------------- >>> The delivery method of truth isn't relevant. That it's truth they're >>> running from is all that's relevant. You've done the same. > <------------- >> "troof"! LOL thanks for admitting that you're a troofTard. you're >> still >> a sociopath and i expect that very soon we'll (TINW) see some very >> public >> and undeniable evidence of that. "chickens coming home to roost" and >> such. > > Awww, your butthurt fanfic is so entertaining, DildoRider... you've > obviously been deeply psychologically scarred by the truth that I > promulgate. Most libtards are. Having the rug pulled out from under > your entire kooky belief system tends to do that to you idiots. LOL > > You'd think by now you'd have learned to just shut your stupid fucking > gob and quietly live your little libtard lie of a life so I wouldn't > utterly conflagrate your entire kooky belief system by exposing it to > the scorching light of reality... but libtards are retarded. LOL more lame strawman bullshit. > >>>>> Even retards like that have to succumb to reality once it's >>>>> driven home with a size 16 steel-toe boot. > <------------- >>>> you talk about your feet a lot, probably to distract from something >>>> else. > <------------- >>> You seem to be obsessed about that "something else"... > <------------- >> i was talking about your tiny brain... > > Nicely backpedaled, DildoRider... except you've admitted *you* are the > stupid one, not me. Remember, it's memorialized in my .sig. LOL you are the one that was thinking about cock again, like usual. > >> i guess we found out not only that i was 100% correct, but that >> what you were distracting from wasn't your atrophied >> conservative noggin. it was, indeed, "something else". > > You're at Gargles-level backpedaling, DildoRider. LOL you walked right into that one, idiot, nice backpedal tho. gargles on your mind lately? > >>> to the point that you turn your "girlfriend" into a "strap-on dude" >>> and make her "rectally ream" you, DildoRider. > <------------- >> magical dildos dancing in your head turning girls into dudes much? >> pretty >> sure i get bonus points for proving that you think about your junk at >> the >> same time that you are fantasizing my girlfriend turning into a man and >> "rectally reaming" me. are you trying to slyly hit on me, klosetBoi? >> LOL >> >> sorry, i don't date insufferable oafs with 6 kids and hawt wives. :( > > Wow, that's some pretty serious projection you're doing, DildoRider. > But I note you don't deny you make your "girlfriend" strap on a dildo > and rectally ream you whenever you can't satisfy your cock addiction. > LOL i don't "make" anybody do anything. i would ask politely. > >>>>> I mean, look at how much good it did your sanity, DildoRider. >>>>> Barely a trace of swish in your blather, and you're talking about TIG >>>>> welding and campfires just like a real man. > <------------- >> ^ there's another of those funny spots where it looks like you meant to >> say something, but changed your mind. > > Or, it could be another of those funny spots where your broken little > libtard brain is misfiring again, DildoRider. LOL nah, it's one of those things where your "program" for quoting is taking empty lines and only adding a single quote char instead of checking the lines above and below to match *at least* the number of levels of quotation as the one above. i'm sure you wouldn't be able to fix it, even having been told what the problem is. > >> ...or perhaps your buggy quoting algorithm? > > Or perhaps your buggy libtard brain. LOL lame. > >> it seems to be indicating that you intentionally put a carriage return >> there, >> but most likely, your cut/paste from your newsreader to your little >> dizum >> duckblind app is adding extra carriage returns for no reason. to >> demonstrate how dumb that looks, i'll be adding an extra carriage return >> after them all. ;) > > I'm not seeing them at all, so I don't know what you're bleating > about... perhaps you've just gone so insane that you're seeing things, > DildoRider. LOL your quoteyProgram is adding in blank lines that aren't quoted in between quoted lines in messages. kind of looks stupid, but i'm sure you "knew" that... it's *your* program, after all. > >>>> wow. the misogyny is getting a little thick, "big man". > <------------- >>> What does misogyny have to do with anything, DildoRider? Unless you're >>> admitting you're a tranny. LOL > <------------- >> what do trannies have to do with anything besides your fixation on them >> and your disgust at a man who would do such a horrible thing as "demote" >> himself to the status of a woman (or maybe lower since your queerphobia >> adds another layer of hate beyond plain-old hatred of femininity)? > > Fucksake, you've been driven to stupidity. Again. LOL > > <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny> > "a hatred of women" > > What does talking about TIG welding and camp fires have to do with > women, unless you're admitting you prance around pretending you're a > transexual woman, DildoRider? first off, i know of ladies who can weld not only better then me, but better than most welders... second, it's not *me* who hates/fears all things feminine and seeks to degrade them to some kind of "woman" status. that would be you, the tranny chasing k0ok who lies about visiting people's homes. seems like you need to learn a new word: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=transmisogyny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmisogyny Transmisogyny (sometimes trans-misogyny) is the intersection of transphobia and misogyny. It was coined by Julia Serano in her 2007 book Whipping Girl and used to describe the unique discrimination faced by trans women because of "the assumption that femaleness and femininity are inferior to, and exist primarily for the benefit of, maleness and masculinity",[1][2][3] and the way that transphobia intensifies the misogyny faced by trans women (and vice versa).[1] Transmisogyny is a central concept in transfeminism and is commonly seen in intersectional feminist theory. The suggestion that trans women's femaleness (rather than their femininity) is a source of transmisogyny is rejected by some feminists, who believe that trans women are not female.[4] > >>>> if you were so great you'd likely not have to put others down. you're >>>> nothing but a swole up infant. it's no wonder that gerg idolizes you. > <------------- >>> Awww, you're so butthurt, DildoRider. Why can't you refute > <------------- >> i came here to distract you from all of those other nasty ko0ks, that's >> why. > > Uh huh... your inability to refute any of that truth that I've > promulgated was because you intentionally decided to melt down > instead? That seems likely, eh? LOL you just let me know when that happens, k? > >>> any of that >>> truth that I've promulgated, which you've run away from? > <------------- >> all i see is you wasting your time and effort and actively denying that >> you're wasting time and effort. > > I see you running away after I utterly demolished all your kooky > libtard blather... shall we go over all that again and torment you a > second time? LOL i see you lying on usenet about knocking on my door and then you calling me a "stalker". > >>>>> Yer welcome, DildoRider. > <------------- >>>> yeah, thanks for outing yourself as a sad little >>>> lonely-in-a-crowded-room malcontent. i'm sorry i hadn't >>>> mentioned it sooner. > <------------- >>> You're projecting, DildoRider. LOL > <------------- >> the truth hurts, does it? how many people are in the room that you are >> currently in, fakey? (the man in the white scrubs doesn't count) > > The kids are in bed, they have a strict 8:30 PM bedtime because > they're up early for morning calisthenics. So just the wife and I are > laughing at you currently, DildoRider. LOL so, your wife is a complete loser as well? hmmm, what are the chances that you're lying? no oversized oafs have knocked on my door. especially during the time you said you were going to be in town. i even double checked just in case i missed an email from my zoneminder setup, but i should have not wasted those 5 seconds on a lying POS... > >>>>>> ^^^ you dropped something... > <------------- >>>>> That's OK. Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer (aka Steve Hall) will be around >>>>> to snuffle it up shortly. He loves that shit. > <------------- >>>> so you have a shit-eating snicker? > <------------- >>> If you consider Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer to be a "shit-eating >>> snicker", that's your prerogative. > <------------- >> i don't know who that is. i was speaking of your shit-eating snicker. > Ah, I see. So your speech impediment precluded your conveying your > message clearly. LOL like the way you snicker while eating shit? > >>>> you might want to brush your teeth. > <------------- >>> Yes, Steve, brush your teeth. > <------------- >> steve's not here man... </chong> > > Yeah, you might want to put the crack pipe down and back away from it, > Cracky McCrackHead... that shit made you melt down hilariously before, > and now you're at it again. I expect you'll be bleating hard in the > wee hours again? Yeah, you will. > > <snicker> > does your wife sit behind you while you type out your bleats a la swayze in 'ghost'? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd --
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-22 19:39 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 19:32 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-11 12:15 -0700
csiph-web