Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #276695
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 |
| References | (3 earlier) <40e47634b06c4e42e3b552f0b761aa9c@dizum.com> <op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> <9da82a59334aa06844031bed9f803b1d@dizum.com> <op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> <3a7c6e15be1b1be329bf07e7d2a83b45@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x5fx0ioktm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:09:36 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.x5dbtiwatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > > You must have spent all night last night bleating out your butthurt, > DildoRider. Your post was so long I had to split my reply into two > parts. Spankard. LOL > >> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:36:20 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis >>> (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA >>> (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump >>> head first into the wood chipper again: > >>> <------------- > > Your melting down so badly that you're seeing things that aren't there > is noted, DildoRider. LOL i suppose i'll just have to write a de-mogrifier for your broken shit poasts. i'll be sure to add in a ascii to binary feature as well as it seems like you were too stupid to figure that one out on your own in the past. > >>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>> Wrangler >>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond >>>>>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW. > >>>>>> yep.. i can't figure it out. you aer so smort. > >>>>> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted. > >>>> yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux >>>> sysadmins >>>> with 2 decades of experience don't use perl. uh-huh. > >>> Says the guy who couldn't figure out how to get a simple Perl program >>> running, and is all pissed about it. > >> yeah, if you repeat it, it will come true, dorothy. LOL > > You admitted it, Witless. LOL yep. probably because i'm just stupid. i'm so stupid that if i *did* know how, i'd still fuck it up and say i couldn't figure it out. probably. > >>> If you were able to get the Perl >>> program running, you can prove it by providing the exact number that >>> the program spits out for Tower 1, DildoRider... if not, your blather >>> is reduced to that of a butthurt kook pissed at his own stupidity. LOL > > <crickets> LOL! i'm not the one who doubts the physics, doofus... or did you forget? i only commented to try to save you about and hour of your day each day responding to the 9-11 troofGoofs. some thanks... > >>>>>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis. > >>>>>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that >>>>>> nobody likes? > >>>>> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider. > >>>> in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of, >>>> being a lonely misanthropic sociopath. > >>> Oh, your fanfic just screams "butthurt", DildoRider... was it >>> something I said that set you off? LOL > >> was it fanfic because you chase trannies on usenet right in front of >> your >> wife and kids? > > Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL your admission you chase trannies on usenet is noted. > >>>>> You didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them. > >>>> i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb. i was the only person >>>> in >>>> my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school. > >>> Says the lonely misanthropic sociopath who was the only person in the >>> room, by his own admission. LOL > >> i wasn't the one chasing trannies on usenet so i could start discussing >> cock and anal sex unprompted, you were. > > Your further admission that you're a tranny is noted. LOL your further admission that you don't understand why hollering "tranny!" at a tranny is completely pointless as well as transmisogyny. > >>>>> Let me guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper >>>>> contamination in the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't >>>>> even know copper burns green. > >>>> nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry. in fact, i know >>>> absolutely >>>> nothing, so you win. that was easy. > >>> Yeah, that was easy. Yay me. Stoooopid kook. LOL > >> awesome. i hope you feel better about yourself, because clearly, you >> needed it more than me. > > Kooks often think that by exposing all their shortcomings themselves, > they can deflect the raucous laughter directed at them. You should > know by now that never works, DildoRider. LOL laughter never bothered me. > >>>>>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might >>>>>>>> signify "nothing". > >>>>>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you >>>>>>> "moron". LOL > >>>>>> you sure seem to be "happy". > >>>>> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL > >>>> why would i act smart? > >>> It's not for your lack of trying, I can assure you of that. LOL > >> that would be stupid of me. > > That's why you try so hard, and fail so hilariously, DildoRider. LOL you wouldn't like me if i "tried hard". > >>>> you don't waste your time attacking people you think are smart. > >>> Ummm, kensi? Arfatzio? Petey John-John Ross? Craptain Neal Whorin'? >>> Vince Lamb? > >> exactly. > > Ummm, kensi the astrophysicist? Petey John-John Ross the mildly > intelligent writer of bad poems (OK, I'll give you that one. LOL)? > Craptain Kneel Whorin' who is obviously intelligent but more than a > bit unhinged? Professor Dr. Richard Vincent Lamb? > > Yeah, I see your point... they must all be idiots. Or you're a moron. > LOL everybody you listed, except kensi, is a total idiot. > >>> Stooopid kook. LOL > >> yes they are. > > Says the college dropout. LOL here's a quotable quote for you: there are lots of idiots in the world... some of them have degrees. > >>>> by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple with stupid >>>> people. > >>> No, that was *your* admission, Stoooopid, when you were admitting you >>> were stupid, as outlined in my .sig. LOL > >> huh? > > Exactly. Stupid. LOL buh? > >>>>>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond >>>>>>>> "something made out of bricks". > >>>>>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet. > >>>>>> no i'm not. > >>>>> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting >>>>> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you. > >>>> define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity. i come here >>>> to waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish >>>> rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of >>>> sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been >>>> invested in for years and years. > >>> I don't try to be king of the hill, DildoRider. It's just that the >>> best naturally prevail and retards like you get bootfucked into frothy >>> meltdowns. LOL > >> LOL > > LOL LOL > >>>>>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them, >>>>>>> DildoRider. >>>>>>> You are, after all, a libtard. > >>>>>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal? > >>>>> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional. >>>>> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions. >>>>> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it. >>>>> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant. > >>>> only four? seems petty. > >>> Only four, but those four are the cornerstones of what's wrong with >>> liberalism, and with you broken-brained libtards. Truth can be >>> succinct, after all, and still do enough damage to fragile little >>> psyches that it sends you into a bleatfarting foamfest. LOL > >> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/09/18/1422640/-White-House-all-but-called-the-entire-Republican-Party-racist >> >> http://ringoffireradio.com/2015/09/white-house-calls-out-the-whole-republican-party-as-racists/ >> >> http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/09/21/white-house-ben-carsons-view-on-a-muslim-president-inconsistent-with-freedom-of-religion-in-america/ >> >> http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/white-house-donald-trump-muslim-gop-213830 > > Still spamming those same links to Obama bleating because Donald Trump > exercised his right to not correct idiots? And as for Ben Carson, a > black man... how exactly is he "racist", especially in light of his > discussing a *religion*, Moron? How is Islam a "race", Moron? LOL ben carson is more than a black man, he's an idiot just like anybody else who thinks that we shouldn't be able to have a muslim president. > >>>>>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up >>>>>>> with him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine? > >>>>>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the >>>>>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew >>>>>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit. > >>>>> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a >>>>> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard >>>>> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones >>>>> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977 >>>>> hovel. > >>>> people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey. you >>>> ought >>>> to know that. > >>> Of course I know that. I also know people don't get rich paying too >>> fucking much for a shitty half-a-house with little appreciation >>> potential. LOL > >> also, people don't get rich by lying on usenet about visiting people's >> houses. > > Or by lying in k'laming they've got a security system when they can't > even afford anything more than a shitty 20 year old Honda Accord > beater. LOL security systems can be had for less than $200. only an idiot like you would hire someone and hope that person doesn't have cat burglar friends. i can afford way more than a beater accord, especially with the money i saved so far driving a beater accord for a decade. only an idiot would have a good car in pittsburgh, anyway. have you ever seen the streets here in spring? perhaps you don't live in a place where they dump corrosive salt on the roads for 6 months. > >> surprising that you didn't simply take a pic of my front door to prove >> your now-vaporized bluster. > > Surprising that you've thus far not posted any of those "security cam" > videos with date stamps for the date in question, DildoRider. We all > know if you had them, you'd have posted them. LOL i don't clutter up my security images with timestamps. the filenames have the timestamps in them. actually, i don't have any clue what the "date in question" is, mostly because unlike you, i'm not an obsessed fucktard and you never posted a date as far as i read. maybe i don't read all of your posts? sorry about that. i did check from the time you announced your alleged pitt visit until 2 weeks later, and sad to say, i saw no images of an idiot oaf on my porch. > >>>> you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do. free clue: one >>>> of my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that >>>> there >>>> "may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a >>>> lot of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days >>>> quite >>>> wealthy. better get to work! >>>> >>>> another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname. > >>> So you were adopted... and subsequently abandoned by your so-called >>> "rich" family... and you think they'll just accept you back into the >>> clan and give you a share of the pot o' gold. Or you're lying, and >>> you're poor, and you're stupid enough to think anyone buys your lying >>> bullshit after you got caught lying about your "rich" parents. LOL > >> the fanfic is strong with this one. > > Says the guy who got caught lying about his "rich" parents. LOL my family seems to be more important to you than your own, these days. is it because the kids are back in school? > >>>> that should keep you busy googling for a while... > >>> No, you're lying, just as you were lying about your parents being >>> rich. It's what you do when you get especially butthurt. LOL > > <crickets> LOL! <fart> LOL > >>>>> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on >>>>> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout. > >>>> my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling >>>> children > >>> Your parents can't afford to spoil you. They're not rich. LOL > >> i said "family", not parents. you got a reading problem? > > "Rich" aunts and uncles aren't going to give you any money, > DildoRider. Especially if they're as "rich" as your parents. LOL did you never know your grandparents or something? straight to "aunts and uncles" as your only relatives when you were born? that's too bad. > >>>> and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to >>>> solve all of my problems. > >>> Your parents probably wouldn't want to make the trip to pull those >>> dildos out of you three times a day anyway, DildoAddict. They couldn't >>> afford the gas. They're on fixed incomes. LOL > >> more fanfic involving dildos from fakey. > > Says the guy riding the dildos and lying about his "rich" parents. LOL <fart> LOL > >>>> you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their parents take care >>>> of everything for them, do you? you seem to think that's how it works >>>> for everybody, for some reason. just wondering where you're getting >>>> your "data". > >>>>> From some retard who's been blathering lies about his "rich" parents. >>>>> LOL > >>>> speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the >>>> statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative >>>> what happens in real life? i told you that those numbers were not >>>> correct. >>>> i told you that my parents are both retired. your little stalkyStats >>>> are >>>> just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i >>>> must say. > >>> Wow, nice foamfart, DildoRider. Was it something I said that got you >>> all upset? LOL > >> "was it something i said" lame is noted. > > Evasion noted. LOL evasion of what? > >> the numbers even said that they were statistical averages. you don't >> read >> that far, though. >> >> what's about $200k times 35 years? do the math, dummy. >> >> now add in all of the inheritances... figure in for the stock options... >> add on the 401k... add on the dividends from third party investments... >> calculate the values of the classic cars... >> >> you sure are a simpleton. > > "inheritances" LOL > > You're not getting any inheritances, DildoRider. that's funny. my parents did, and so will i, genius. > > "401k" LOL > > At your $75/yr worker bee job, you likely have about $50,000 saved up, > if that, given that you waste your money. LOL i was responding to your goofy k'lames about my parents that you based on some generic results from a website. > > "classic cars" LOL > > You mean your 20 year old Honda Accord beater? LOL no, the classic cars that my parents have collected. i'd put classic plates on mine but i actually use it sometimes. there are limits on how often a week you can drive a classic car and where you can drive it to. > > Well, you can always sell your 200 clowncycles that you have to pedal > at 5000 RPM to go 10 MPH... for scrap. LOL i only have 3 trials bikes, spaz. their total value is only about $3000. parted out they are worth more, what with all of the highly sought after high-end and titanium parts i've used. go look up the price of a chris king mountain bike hubset. now look up an industry9 mountain hubset. that's just the hubs on two of the bikes. > >>>>> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's >>>>> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've >>>>> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that >>>>> the >>>>> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely >>>>> increased by the rising real estate market... > >>> And that's $36 per month not factoring in such items as maintenance >>> and upkeep... you're losing money big-time on that shitshack, even >>> with the price appreciation. LOL > >> did you factor in all of the rent from various roommates for the last 15 >> years? > > Did you forget that the reason you bleated about needing a house is so > you had more room? so, you think i have to rent out every room becaue you're an idiot, eh? i rent out my 3rd floor, genius. i've only ever had 2 roommates at a time. those roommates also needed room for their bike and musician stuff. nobody complained, so i guess i completely fucked up. yep. BTW: that "DRIVEWAY" that you saw on the google street view was written after my old roommate went to leave for work at 7am and some idiot had blocked the driveway one too many times. i was also concerned about the other 4 households whose cars were being blocked in. haven't had that problem happen much lately. but you know, because i'm stupid and i forget what a "driveway" is occasionally, i had to label it. mmmHmmm. > Now you've been caught in that lie, too. Do you > ever *not* lie about how pathetic your life is, DildoRider? LOL is that like how you got caught in a lie k'laming you came to my house? did the driveway look the same as it does on the google street view? did you notice anything different from how it looks on google when you "were here"? LOL free clue: a friend of mine bought it at sheriff's sale this year. he's having his side of the roof either re-done or patched. it's a 103 year old slate roof on his side. i suggested that if he gets guys walking all over it in fall, he's going to be pissed in the winter and spring when it's leaking in new spots from being walked on and he can't get it fixed easily until the weather is above freezing. the elderly lady who lived next door and passed away a year ago in a care facility after a battle with c-dif following a fall refused to do anything about her clogged up drain in the back, the roof, and the borer-infested tree out in front of that property. i tried to help her as much as i could by doing her lawn and taking her garbage to the curb every week for 15 years. my guess is that her shitty kids that hardly ever came to visit her spent or hoarded all of her savings for her and left her in poverty. > >>>> you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more >>>> important than someone's perceived quality of life. > >>> You could have at least bought an actual house instead of a >>> half-a-house with a limited appreciation potential, Dumbshit. Is that >>> the best you could afford? LOL > >> 2500 square feet, 5 bedrooms, three baths, 2.5 baths, 3 floors plus full >> basement isn't enough for me? don't tell NEMO, but there's a 100 year >> old >> mezuzah on my back door frame from some rich new yorker who lived here >> from 1912 until probably around the great depression. it seems to >> befuddle you that i can live in a really nice house in a really nice >> area. > > "really nice house" LOL > > It's a shitshack dilapidated overgrown overgrown? let me guess... your house is situated exposed out in the blazing hot sun so that everybody can stare at its majesty and so you can pay double heating and cooling bills like an idiot. > half-a-house with half the roof of course you'll refuse to note that i repaired over half of that roof. the new owner next door is fixing the other. > in desperate need of complete replacement... which could only be done once the late neighbor's kids left the house and it's entire contents go to sheriff sale after over a year of fighting and bickering over it and legal bullshit. > meaning maintenance has > been deferred on that hovel to the point that it can't even appreciate > faster than inflation. LOL except most of what you are fakeyGoogling and seeing has been fixed already. likely, you idiotically think that google maps is a real-time live website, since you have some brain damage from getting your head knocked around so much during your lifetime. feel free to split your response up into as many parts as you need in order to be a fucking idiot. i've been on usenet since 1994 and have never seen anybody but complete k0oks do the shit you do on it. PS: you could always choose a more normal way to poast that doesn't have limitations on the size of posts? -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name? <snicker> You> Gerg FakeyBot> Oh look you're back again to polish my size 16 boot with your colon, Gerg. <snicker> Gerg> No, not again. I just had it detailed. FakeyBot> Why do you say you just had it detailed? Gerg> Because it's still seeping FakeyBot> Is that the real reason? Gerg> Mostly, yes. FakeyBot> Why don't you tell me a little more about this. Gerg> it's personal. i think i got it from the bucket. FakeyBot> Why do you say you think you got it from the bucket? Gerg> i fell in last night. FakeyBot> Why do you say you fell in last night? Gerg> I was nearly killed. FakeyBot> You should probably off yourself. <snicker> FakeyBot> The world won't miss you. <snicker>
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-22 19:39 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 19:32 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-11 12:15 -0700
csiph-web