Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #276589
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| References | (3 earlier) <6428b55dad79068f352eae9c201769a6@dizum.com> <op.x46hi4f9tm21m2@benson.localhost> <1d42ddd5704e94ae474ba046db8ec2bb@dizum.com> <op.x5apk6m1tm21m2@benson.localhost> <40e47634b06c4e42e3b552f0b761aa9c@dizum.com> |
| Subject | Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes |
| Date | 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x5b8wl0otm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:25:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x5apk6m1tm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:41:51 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x46hi4f9tm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider)
>>>>> of
>>>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43crnfwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:36:30 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Topaz, in <news:1bmjva9oh48ftbi97hv598lnduqbqrhj2p@4ax.com> did
>>>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:34:44 -0400, Sarah Ehrett
>>>>>>>> <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt steel it WEAKENED IT.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It isn't rocket science to know that if you heat steel it WEAKENS
>>>>>>>>> it. WEAKENED steel will fail. When it can no longer hold a load
>>>>>>>>> failure occurs.
>
>>>>>>>> For one thing that wouldn't quickly collapse the whole building.
>>>>>>>> And a lot of steel did melt. This youtube video is absolute proof:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7S9bnd_pnY
>
>>>>>>> I see no molten steel in that entire video. I see a large ball of
>>>>>>> what was once molten metal, with no analysis of where it came
>>>>>>> from. Of
>>>>>>> course, structural steel wasn't the only steel in the twin towers.
>>>>>>> There was plenty of very low-grade steel in office furniture.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steel loses a significant amount of its strength just before it
>>>>>>> starts to glow a dull red (approx.900 deg.F). We know the
>>>>>>> temperature
>>>>>>> reached at least 950 F because the aircraft frames melted.
>>>>>>> 2219-T81 aircraft grade aluminum melts at 950 F.
>
>>>>>>> Heated to a bright orange (nowhere near the melting point), steel
>>>>>>> enters a "plastic" state. Exceptions are specialized steel alloys
>>>>>>> which have outstanding heat tolerance, but are much too costly to
>>>>>>> frame a building with.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find it strange that we have reports of "molten steel" (likely
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> structural steel, but cheaper, lower grade steel in office
>>>>>>> furniture
>>>>>>> and interior finish materials... imagine how many office chairs
>>>>>>> alone
>>>>>>> there were, likely at least 250 per floor... and almost all of them
>>>>>>> made of very low-grade steel... at just 5 pounds per chair or
>>>>>>> table,
>>>>>>> that's half a ton of very low-grade steel per floor), yet no actual
>>>>>>> pictures of same... not even any pictures of that "molten steel"
>>>>>>> being pulled out of the ground. Plenty of pictures of
>>>>>>> incandescently hot
>>>>>>> steel being pulled out of the ground... no molten steel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whoopsie:
>>>>>>> <http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/html/article_20040619.html>
>>>>>>> 9/11 cops saw collapse coming
>>>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>>> The World Trade Center towers showed telltale signs they were about
>>>>>>> to collapse several minutes before each crumbled to the ground,
>>>>>>> scientists probing the Sept. 11, 2001, disaster said yesterday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the case of the north tower, police chopper pilots reported
>>>>>>> seeing
>>>>>>> the warning signs - an inward bowing of the building facade - at
>>>>>>> least eight minutes before it collapsed at 10:29 a.m.
>>>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aCuh.ATdfOXc&refer=top_world_news>
>>>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>>> Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the
>>>>>>> World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police
>>>>>>> Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the
>>>>>>> buildings'
>>>>>>> columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were
>>>>>>> about to fall.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ``No evidence has been found to suggest the information was
>>>>>>> communicated to all emergency responders at the scene,'' said an
>>>>>>> executive summary of a progress report by the National Institute of
>>>>>>> Standards and Technology, which is conducting the study.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Investigators also found evidence that the south tower, which fell
>>>>>>> 56
>>>>>>> minutes after it was struck by terrorists in a hijacked commercial
>>>>>>> jet, had less fire proofing than the north tower, which held up for
>>>>>>> about double the time after it was hit.
>>>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm>
>>>>>>> <http://www.debunking911.com/debris.jpg>
>>>>>>> See the sagging floor beams in the picture above? Just as I said,
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> floor spars sagged, ripped apart the viscoelastic dampers, which
>>>>>>> removed the horizontal support for the outer truss frame. The truss
>>>>>>> frame at the top-most mechanical room floor (where all the truss
>>>>>>> frame sections were inexplicably joined at one floor... they were
>>>>>>> staggered on every other floor to increase strength) bore the load
>>>>>>> of the increased weight on the truss frame until the two 5/8" bolts
>>>>>>> joining each truss frame section together broke. This left the
>>>>>>> entire truss frame above that mechanical room floor disconnected,
>>>>>>> hanging off the top-hat truss, which transferred all that weight
>>>>>>> to the central column and magnified the buckling force upon the
>>>>>>> central column. The fire heat-weakened the central column, which
>>>>>>> buckled, transferring some of the weight back onto the truss frame
>>>>>>> and ripping even more of the viscoelastic dampers. The truss frame
>>>>>>> collapsed at that mechanical room floor (which can be seen in some
>>>>>>> of the videos immediately prior to the whole-building collapse),
>>>>>>> and it collapsed slightly sideways due to the hole left by the
>>>>>>> aircraft impact. The collapse of the truss frame at the mechanical
>>>>>>> room floor triggered the cascading whole-building collapse, and the
>>>>>>> angle at which the upper truss frame collapsed dragged the building
>>>>>>> slightly off-center as it fell, leaving behind the surviving
>>>>>>> staircase at the base of the building because it was outside the
>>>>>>> 'fall shadow' of the building.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That pretty much negates you kook's "controlled demolition"
>>>>>>> blather.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You moron.
>
>>>>>> i've molten steel with as little as 220 volts plus some current.
>
>>>>> You can melt steel with a Bic lighter. Get a steel scrubbing sponge
>>>>> and a lighter and try it out. You'll also see tiny metal balls form,
>>>>> just as was found at the WTC site... strange that some of the
>>>>> insulation in the towers was rock wool, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.slg.jp/e/slag/product/rockwool.html>
>
>>>>>> i wonder how much stored kinetic energy in all those floors of
>>>>>> carpets, wood, desks, paper, plastic, charred humans, and a
>>>>>> little bit of 2 exploded planes had in it? has anybody ever
>>>>>> wagered a guess?
>
>>>>> 250 to 300 GigaJoules per tower, or a total of 138 MWh to 166 MWh. Or
>>>>> approximately enough energy to fuel one person at 2000 kilocalories
>>>>> per day for 196 years. IOW, a great fucking lot of energy. And that
>>>>> doesn't even take into account the amount of heat gained from burning
>>>>> material, that's just the potential energy of the building converting
>>>>> to heat.
>
>>>>> http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> At 32,000 sq feet of tenant space per floor and at 4lbs per sq ft of
>>>>> combustible material (at 5 lbs per sq ft NIST found that the fires
>>>>> moved too slowly) for 110 floors (-6 floors for mechanical + 6 for
>>>>> underground) is equal to 14 Million POUNDS of combustible material.
>>>>> Or
>>>>> 7,000 TONS. Clearly a RESPECTABLE amount of burnable material per
>>>>> TOWER. Thus the rubble pile had ~ 28 MILLION POUNDS of combustible
>>>>> material not including what was in the Marriot hotel and its parking
>>>>> garage.
>>>>>
>>>>> **BEGIN PROGRAM**
>>>>>
>>>>> # Demonstrates the kinetic energy of the WTC collapses, to debunk
>>>>> 9/11
>>>>> conspiracies # http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/moltensteel.htm
>>>>> #
>>>>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Variables for calculations
>>>>> $m = 4285500; # mass of one floor (kg)
>>>>> $mt = 0; # mass of falling section
>>>>> $v1 = 0; # beginning velocity for the current step
>>>>> $v2 = 0; # velocity at impact
>>>>> $v3 = 0; # ending velocity for prior step $p = 0; # current momentum
>>>>> $ke1 = 0; # kinetic energy at impact
>>>>> $ke2 = 0; # kinetic energy after impact
>>>>> $de = 0; # total energy dissipated so far $a = 9.80665; #
>>>>> acceleration
>>>>> of gravity (constant) $t = 0; # cumulative time taken
>>>>> $t1 = 0; # time taken for this step
>>>>> $d = 3.8; # distance between floors (418m/110 stories) $mt = $fc*$m;
>>>>> #
>>>>> initialize mass of falling section # # Calculations for WTC Tower One
>>>>> $fc = 13; # floor count of falling section (13 floors for WTC One)
>>>>> $rfc = 110 - $fc; # initialize remaining floor count of uncollapsed
>>>>> floors print("Data for WTC Tower One\n"); print("\n"); while($rfc >
>>>>> 0)
>>>>> { print("Data for story ", $rfc, " -\n");
>>>>> $v1 = $v3; # starting velocity is ending for last step
>>>>> $v2 = (($v1*2)+((2*$a)*$d))**0.5; # impact velocity for this step by
>>>>> formula print("Impact velocity: ", $v2, "\n"); $p = $mt*$v2; #
>>>>> momentum at impact print("Impulse delivered: ", $p, "\n");
>>>>> $ke1 = ($mt*($v2**2))/2; # kinetic energy at impact print("Impact
>>>>> kinetic energy: ", $ke1, "\n"); $fc++; # increment falling floor
>>>>> count
>>>>> $mt = $fc*$m; # update mass of falling section
>>>>> $v3 = $p/$mt; # new velocity
>>>>> print("Velocity after impact: ", $v3, "\n");
>>>>> $ke2 = ($mt*($v3**2))/2; # kinetic energy after impact
>>>>> print("Remaining kinetic energy: ", $ke2, "\n"); $de += $ke1 - $ke2;
>>>>> #
>>>>> add dissipated kinetic energy to total print("Kinetic energy
>>>>> dissipated: ", $ke1 - $ke2, "\n");
>>>>> $t1 = $d/(($v2 + $v1)/2); # time for this step by formula print("Time
>>>>> spent collapsing: ", $t1, "\n"); $t += $t1; # add step time to
>>>>> running
>>>>> total $rfc--; # decrement remaining floor count print("\n"); }
>>>>> print("Overall WTC Tower One data -\n"); print("Total collapse time:
>>>>> ", $t, "\n"); print("Total energy dissipated during the collapse: ",
>>>>> $de, "\n"); print("Remaining kinetic energy at the end of the
>>>>> collapse: ", $ke2, "\n"); print("\n"); # # Calculations for WTC Tower
>>>>> Two $fc = 39; # floor count of falling section (39 floors for WTC
>>>>> Two)
>>>>> $rfc = 110 - $fc; # initialize remaining floor count of uncollapsed
>>>>> floors print("Data for WTC Tower Two\n"); print("\n"); while($rfc >
>>>>> 0)
>>>>> { print("Data for story ", $rfc, " -\n");
>>>>> $v1 = $v3; # starting velocity is ending for last step
>>>>> $v2 = (($v1*2)+((2*$a)*$d))**0.5; # impact velocity for this step by
>>>>> formula print("Impact velocity: ", $v2, "\n"); $p = $mt*$v2; #
>>>>> momentum at impact print("Impulse delivered: ", $p, "\n");
>>>>> $ke1 = ($mt*($v2**2))/2; # kinetic energy at impact print("Impact
>>>>> kinetic energy: ", $ke1, "\n"); $fc++; # increment falling floor
>>>>> count
>>>>> $mt = $fc*$m; # update mass of falling section
>>>>> $v3 = $p/$mt; # new velocity
>>>>> print("Velocity after impact: ", $v3, "\n");
>>>>> $ke2 = ($mt*($v3**2))/2; # kinetic energy after impact
>>>>> print("Remaining kinetic energy: ", $ke2, "\n"); $de += $ke1 - $ke2;
>>>>> #
>>>>> add dissipated kinetic energy to total print("Kinetic energy
>>>>> dissipated: ", $ke1 - $ke2, "\n");
>>>>> $t1 = $d/(($v2 + $v1)/2); # time for this step by formula print("Time
>>>>> spent collapsing: ", $t1, "\n"); $t += $t1; # add step time to
>>>>> running
>>>>> total $rfc--; # decrement remaining floor count print("\n"); }
>>>>> print("Overall WTC Tower Two data -\n"); print("Total collapse time:
>>>>> ", $t, "\n"); print("Total energy dissipated during the collapse: ",
>>>>> $de, "\n"); print("Remaining kinetic energy at the end of the
>>>>> collapse: ", $ke2, "\n");
>>>>>
>>>>> **END PROGRAM**
>
>>>> if someone needs to run this program to prove to themselves that a
>>>> building can't collapse when 2 airliners slam into it, then i highly
>>>> doubt they can a) manage to install perl and b) execute a perl script.
>
>>> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
>>> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.
>
>> yep.. i can't figure it out. you aer so smort.
>
> Your admission that you couldn't get the Perl program working, noted.
yeah, because "smart" people like you would assume that linux sysadmins
with 2 decades of experience don't use perl. uh-huh.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.
>
>> how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that nobody
>> likes?
>
> Except I'm the smartest smart person in the room, DildoRider.
in fact, i bet you're the only person in the room which you speak of,
being a lonely misanthropic sociopath.
> You
> didn't even know about Swan Bands until I told you about them.
i knew about swan bands in 8th grade, dimbulb. i was the only person in
my self-directed organic chem IV class in high school.
> Let me
> guess, you thought the green fire was due to copper contamination in
> the fire? Oh... you're so stoooopid you didn't even know copper burns
> green.
nope, i never had 7 odd years of chemistry. in fact, i know absolutely
nothing, so you win. that was easy.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>>>> signify "nothing".
>
>>> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you "moron".
>>> LOL
>
>> you sure seem to be "happy".
>
> You sure seem to be "smart". LOL
why would i act smart? you don't waste your time attacking people you
think are smart. by your own admission, you can only manage to grapple
with stupid people.
>
>>>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond "something
>>>> made out of bricks".
>
>>> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.
>
>> no i'm not.
>
> Ok, so you run from their "intellect". No shame in your admitting
> they're "smarter" and "saner" than you.
define: "dealing with" in regard to your usenet activity. i come here to
waste time while i wait for effects to process, something to finish
rendering, or compiling some C code, not to orchestrate some kind of
sandbox "king of the hill" exercise like you appear to have been invested
in for years and years.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> They don't understand much. You're not far ahead of them, DildoRider.
>>> You are, after all, a libtard.
>
>> can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?
>
> 1) You're detached from reality. IOW, you're delusional.
> 2) You lie about pretty much everything to sustain your delusions.
> 3) You couldn't buy a clue if your life depended upon it.
> 4) When you're given free clue, you prove yourself clue-repellant.
only four? seems petty.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up with
>>> him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?
>
>> what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
>> psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
>> conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.
>
> Nicely foot-stomped, DildoRider. It's not you're fault you're a
> low-rent uneducated delusional boner-huffing dildoriding libtard
> product of a public education. Blame your parents. You know, the ones
> you lied about and k'lamed were rich living in their shitty $154,977
> hovel.
people don't get rich wasting money on expensive shit, fakey. you ought
to know that.
you have 2 or three more generations of digging to do. free clue: one of
my direct relatives was a state senator and there are rumors that there
"may have" been some bootlegging going on during prohibition making a lot
of remote central PA farmers and police officers in those days quite
wealthy. better get to work!
another free cloo: my birth surname is not my current surname.
that should keep you busy googling for a while...
> If you were rich, you wouldn't have had to pay for 15 years on
> that college loan for the education you didn't get, College Dropout.
my parents are not from a generation that believes in spoiling children
and i don't operate from a mindset that defers to rely on family to solve
all of my problems. you wouldn't happen to know anybody that had their
parents take care of everything for them, do you? you seem to think
that's how it works for everybody, for some reason. just wondering where
you're getting your "data".
speaking of data: how dumb does one have to be to think that the
statistically averaged numbers you see on some website are indicative what
happens in real life? i told you that those numbers were not correct. i
told you that my parents are both retired. your little stalkyStats are
just stabs in the dark - which fits your modus operandi quite well, i must
say.
> And you wouldn't have to live in a shitty shanty half-a-house that's
> appreciated by a net total of $36 per month for the whole time you've
> owned it, as you bragged about how much it was "worth"... not that the
> property actually appreciated in value, it's price was merely
> increased by the rising real estate market...
you're so dumb that you think that statistics on a website are more
important than someone's perceived quality of life.
> a rising level in the
> toilet bowl lifts all turds, you know. Too bad it couldn't even keep
> up with inflation.
i bought it to live in, not to flip or give to my snot-nosed kid, genius.
i like a roof over my head where i can do whatever the hell i want without
shifty landlord or homeowner's association rules and i'm willing to pay
for it.
what was your first house like, fakey? something you wouldn't even want
to live in so you rented it out to some poor sap?
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> back to your socialist-like *free* education of 911konspiracyK0oks...
>>>> hahaha! ;)
>
>>> I note they're pretty quiet lately.
>
>> maybe they gave up dealing with a sociopath hiding behind a remailer.
>
> The delivery method of truth isn't relevant. That it's truth they're
> running from is all that's relevant. You've done the same.
"troof"! LOL thanks for admitting that you're a troofTard. you're still
a sociopath and i expect that very soon we'll (TINW) see some very public
and undeniable evidence of that. "chickens coming home to roost" and such.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Even retards like that have to succumb to reality once it's
>>> driven home with a size 16 steel-toe boot.
>
>> you talk about your feet a lot, probably to distract from something
>> else.
>
> You seem to be obsessed about that "something else"...
i was talking about your tiny brain... i guess we found out not only that
i was
100% correct, but that what you were distracting from wasn't your atrophied
conservative noggin. it was, indeed, "something else".
> to the point
> that you turn your "girlfriend" into a "strap-on dude" and make her
> "rectally ream" you, DildoRider.
magical dildos dancing in your head turning girls into dudes much? pretty
sure i get bonus points for proving that you think about your junk at the
same time that you are fantasizing my girlfriend turning into a man and
"rectally reaming" me. are you trying to slyly hit on me, klosetBoi? LOL
sorry, i don't date insufferable oafs with 6 kids and hawt wives. :(
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> I mean, look at how much good it did your sanity, DildoRider.
>>> Barely a trace of swish in your blather, and you're talking about TIG
>>> welding and campfires just like a real man.
>
^ there's another of those funny spots where it looks like you meant to
say something,
but changed your mind. ...or perhaps your buggy quoting algorithm? it
seems to be indicating that you intentionally put a carriage return there,
but most likely, your cut/paste from your newsreader to your little dizum
duckblind app is adding extra carriage returns for no reason. to
demonstrate how dumb that looks, i'll be adding an extra carriage return
after them all. ;)
>> wow. the misogyny is getting a little thick, "big man".
>
> What does misogyny have to do with anything, DildoRider? Unless you're
> admitting you're a tranny. LOL
what do trannies have to do with anything besides your fixation on them
and your disgust at a man who would do such a horrible thing as "demote"
himself to the status of a woman (or maybe lower since your queerphobia
adds another layer of hate beyond plain-old hatred of femininity)?
>
>> if you were so great you'd likely not have to put others down. you're
>> nothing but a swole up infant. it's no wonder that gerg idolizes you.
>
> Awww, you're so butthurt, DildoRider. Why can't you refute
i came here to distract you from all of those other nasty ko0ks, that's
why.
> any of that
> truth that I've promulgated, which you've run away from?
all i see is you wasting your time and effort and actively denying that
you're wasting time and effort.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> Yer welcome, DildoRider.
>
>> yeah, thanks for outing yourself as a sad little
>> lonely-in-a-crowded-room
>> malcontent. i'm sorry i hadn't mentioned it sooner.
>
> You're projecting, DildoRider. LOL
the truth hurts, does it? how many people are in the room that you are
currently in, fakey? (the man in the white scrubs doesn't count)
>
>>>> ^^^ you dropped something...
>
>>> That's OK. Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer (aka Steve Hall) will be around
>>> to snuffle it up shortly. He loves that shit.
>
>> so you have a shit-eating snicker?
>
> If you consider Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer to be a "shit-eating
> snicker", that's your prerogative.
i don't know who that is. i was speaking of your shit-eating snicker.
>
> <snicker>
>
>> you might want to brush your teeth.
>
> Yes, Steve, brush your teeth.
steve's not here man... </chong>
>
> <snicker>
>
--
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
--
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-22 19:39 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 19:32 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-11 12:15 -0700
csiph-web