Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #603566
| Newsgroups | alt.colonoscopy, alt.wingnuts, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.microphallus |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes |
| References | (3 earlier) <6ae8f989de62f733dd0568c7f5fa1bfd@dizum.com> <op.x43crnfwtm21m2@benson.localhost> <6428b55dad79068f352eae9c201769a6@dizum.com> <op.x46hi4f9tm21m2@benson.localhost> <1d42ddd5704e94ae474ba046db8ec2bb@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2015-09-21 00:32 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.x5apk6m1tm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:41:51 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x46hi4f9tm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:44:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>
>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
>>> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
>>> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x43crnfwtm21m2@benson.localhost> did
>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:36:30 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote
>>>> Wrangler
>>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>
>>>>> Topaz, in <news:1bmjva9oh48ftbi97hv598lnduqbqrhj2p@4ax.com> did
>>>>> thusly
>>>>> jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:34:44 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> It didn't melt steel it WEAKENED IT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It isn't rocket science to know that if you heat steel it WEAKENS
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> WEAKENED steel will fail. When it can no longer hold a load
>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>> occurs.
>
>>>>>> For one thing that wouldn't quickly collapse the whole building.
>>>>>> And a
>>>>>> lot of steel did melt. This youtube video is absolute proof:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7S9bnd_pnY
>
>>>>> I see no molten steel in that entire video. I see a large ball of
>>>>> what
>>>>> was once molten metal, with no analysis of where it came from. Of
>>>>> course, structural steel wasn't the only steel in the twin towers.
>>>>> There was plenty of very low-grade steel in office furniture.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steel loses a significant amount of its strength just before it
>>>>> starts
>>>>> to glow a dull red (approx.900 deg.F). We know the temperature
>>>>> reached
>>>>> at least 950 F because the aircraft frames melted. 2219-T81 aircraft
>>>>> grade aluminum melts at 950 F.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heated to a bright orange (nowhere near the melting point), steel
>>>>> enters a "plastic" state. Exceptions are specialized steel alloys
>>>>> which have outstanding heat tolerance, but are much too costly to
>>>>> frame a building with.
>>>>>
>>>>> I find it strange that we have reports of "molten steel" (likely not
>>>>> structural steel, but cheaper, lower grade steel in office furniture
>>>>> and interior finish materials... imagine how many office chairs alone
>>>>> there were, likely at least 250 per floor... and almost all of them
>>>>> made of very low-grade steel... at just 5 pounds per chair or table,
>>>>> that's half a ton of very low-grade steel per floor), yet no actual
>>>>> pictures of same... not even any pictures of that "molten steel"
>>>>> being
>>>>> pulled out of the ground. Plenty of pictures of incandescently hot
>>>>> steel being pulled out of the ground... no molten steel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whoopsie:
>>>>> <http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/html/article_20040619.html>
>>>>> 9/11 cops saw collapse coming
>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>> The World Trade Center towers showed telltale signs they were about
>>>>> to
>>>>> collapse several minutes before each crumbled to the ground,
>>>>> scientists probing the Sept. 11, 2001, disaster said yesterday.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the case of the north tower, police chopper pilots reported seeing
>>>>> the warning signs - an inward bowing of the building facade - at
>>>>> least
>>>>> eight minutes before it collapsed at 10:29 a.m.
>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aCuh.ATdfOXc&refer=top_world_news>
>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>> Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the
>>>>> World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police
>>>>> Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the buildings'
>>>>> columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were
>>>>> about
>>>>> to fall.
>>>>>
>>>>> ``No evidence has been found to suggest the information was
>>>>> communicated to all emergency responders at the scene,'' said an
>>>>> executive summary of a progress report by the National Institute of
>>>>> Standards and Technology, which is conducting the study.
>>>>>
>>>>> Investigators also found evidence that the south tower, which fell 56
>>>>> minutes after it was struck by terrorists in a hijacked commercial
>>>>> jet, had less fire proofing than the north tower, which held up for
>>>>> about double the time after it was hit.
>>>>> =========================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm>
>>>>> <http://www.debunking911.com/debris.jpg>
>>>>> See the sagging floor beams in the picture above? Just as I said, the
>>>>> floor spars sagged, ripped apart the viscoelastic dampers, which
>>>>> removed the horizontal support for the outer truss frame. The truss
>>>>> frame at the top-most mechanical room floor (where all the truss
>>>>> frame
>>>>> sections were inexplicably joined at one floor... they were staggered
>>>>> on every other floor to increase strength) bore the load of the
>>>>> increased weight on the truss frame until the two 5/8" bolts joining
>>>>> each truss frame section together broke. This left the entire truss
>>>>> frame above that mechanical room floor disconnected, hanging off the
>>>>> top-hat truss, which transferred all that weight to the central
>>>>> column
>>>>> and magnified the buckling force upon the central column. The fire
>>>>> heat-weakened the central column, which buckled, transferring some of
>>>>> the weight back onto the truss frame and ripping even more of the
>>>>> viscoelastic dampers. The truss frame collapsed at that mechanical
>>>>> room floor (which can be seen in some of the videos immediately prior
>>>>> to the whole-building collapse), and it collapsed slightly sideways
>>>>> due to the hole left by the aircraft impact. The collapse of the
>>>>> truss
>>>>> frame at the mechanical room floor triggered the cascading
>>>>> whole-building collapse, and the angle at which the upper truss frame
>>>>> collapsed dragged the building slightly off-center as it fell,
>>>>> leaving
>>>>> behind the surviving staircase at the base of the building because it
>>>>> was outside the 'fall shadow' of the building.
>>>>>
>>>>> That pretty much negates you kook's "controlled demolition" blather.
>>>>>
>>>>> You moron.
>>>>>
>>>>> <snicker>
>
>>>> i've molten steel with as little as 220 volts plus some current.
>
>>> You can melt steel with a Bic lighter. Get a steel scrubbing sponge
>>> and a lighter and try it out. You'll also see tiny metal balls form,
>>> just as was found at the WTC site... strange that some of the
>>> insulation in the towers was rock wool, eh?
>>>
>>> <http://www.slg.jp/e/slag/product/rockwool.html>
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>
>>>> i wonder
>>>> how much stored kinetic energy in all those floors of carpets, wood,
>>>> desks, paper, plastic, charred humans, and a little bit of 2 exploded
>>>> planes had in it? has anybody ever wagered a guess?
>
>>> 250 to 300 GigaJoules per tower, or a total of 138 MWh to 166 MWh. Or
>>> approximately enough energy to fuel one person at 2000 kilocalories
>>> per day for 196 years. IOW, a great fucking lot of energy. And that
>>> doesn't even take into account the amount of heat gained from burning
>>> material, that's just the potential energy of the building converting
>>> to heat.
>>>
>>> http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm
>>>
>>> At 32,000 sq feet of tenant space per floor and at 4lbs per sq ft of
>>> combustible material (at 5 lbs per sq ft NIST found that the fires
>>> moved too slowly) for 110 floors (-6 floors for mechanical + 6 for
>>> underground) is equal to 14 Million POUNDS of combustible material. Or
>>> 7,000 TONS. Clearly a RESPECTABLE amount of burnable material per
>>> TOWER. Thus the rubble pile had ~ 28 MILLION POUNDS of combustible
>>> material not including what was in the Marriot hotel and its parking
>>> garage.
>>>
>>> **BEGIN PROGRAM**
>>>
>>> # Demonstrates the kinetic energy of the WTC collapses, to debunk 9/11
>>> conspiracies # http://www.geocities.com/debunking911/moltensteel.htm
>>> #
>>> #!/usr/bin/perl
>>> #
>>> # Variables for calculations
>>> $m = 4285500; # mass of one floor (kg)
>>> $mt = 0; # mass of falling section
>>> $v1 = 0; # beginning velocity for the current step
>>> $v2 = 0; # velocity at impact
>>> $v3 = 0; # ending velocity for prior step $p = 0; # current momentum
>>> $ke1 = 0; # kinetic energy at impact
>>> $ke2 = 0; # kinetic energy after impact
>>> $de = 0; # total energy dissipated so far $a = 9.80665; # acceleration
>>> of gravity (constant) $t = 0; # cumulative time taken
>>> $t1 = 0; # time taken for this step
>>> $d = 3.8; # distance between floors (418m/110 stories) $mt = $fc*$m; #
>>> initialize mass of falling section # # Calculations for WTC Tower One
>>> $fc = 13; # floor count of falling section (13 floors for WTC One)
>>> $rfc = 110 - $fc; # initialize remaining floor count of uncollapsed
>>> floors print("Data for WTC Tower One\n"); print("\n"); while($rfc > 0)
>>> { print("Data for story ", $rfc, " -\n");
>>> $v1 = $v3; # starting velocity is ending for last step
>>> $v2 = (($v1*2)+((2*$a)*$d))**0.5; # impact velocity for this step by
>>> formula print("Impact velocity: ", $v2, "\n"); $p = $mt*$v2; #
>>> momentum at impact print("Impulse delivered: ", $p, "\n");
>>> $ke1 = ($mt*($v2**2))/2; # kinetic energy at impact print("Impact
>>> kinetic energy: ", $ke1, "\n"); $fc++; # increment falling floor count
>>> $mt = $fc*$m; # update mass of falling section
>>> $v3 = $p/$mt; # new velocity
>>> print("Velocity after impact: ", $v3, "\n");
>>> $ke2 = ($mt*($v3**2))/2; # kinetic energy after impact
>>> print("Remaining kinetic energy: ", $ke2, "\n"); $de += $ke1 - $ke2; #
>>> add dissipated kinetic energy to total print("Kinetic energy
>>> dissipated: ", $ke1 - $ke2, "\n");
>>> $t1 = $d/(($v2 + $v1)/2); # time for this step by formula print("Time
>>> spent collapsing: ", $t1, "\n"); $t += $t1; # add step time to running
>>> total $rfc--; # decrement remaining floor count print("\n"); }
>>> print("Overall WTC Tower One data -\n"); print("Total collapse time:
>>> ", $t, "\n"); print("Total energy dissipated during the collapse: ",
>>> $de, "\n"); print("Remaining kinetic energy at the end of the
>>> collapse: ", $ke2, "\n"); print("\n"); # # Calculations for WTC Tower
>>> Two $fc = 39; # floor count of falling section (39 floors for WTC Two)
>>> $rfc = 110 - $fc; # initialize remaining floor count of uncollapsed
>>> floors print("Data for WTC Tower Two\n"); print("\n"); while($rfc > 0)
>>> { print("Data for story ", $rfc, " -\n");
>>> $v1 = $v3; # starting velocity is ending for last step
>>> $v2 = (($v1*2)+((2*$a)*$d))**0.5; # impact velocity for this step by
>>> formula print("Impact velocity: ", $v2, "\n"); $p = $mt*$v2; #
>>> momentum at impact print("Impulse delivered: ", $p, "\n");
>>> $ke1 = ($mt*($v2**2))/2; # kinetic energy at impact print("Impact
>>> kinetic energy: ", $ke1, "\n"); $fc++; # increment falling floor count
>>> $mt = $fc*$m; # update mass of falling section
>>> $v3 = $p/$mt; # new velocity
>>> print("Velocity after impact: ", $v3, "\n");
>>> $ke2 = ($mt*($v3**2))/2; # kinetic energy after impact
>>> print("Remaining kinetic energy: ", $ke2, "\n"); $de += $ke1 - $ke2; #
>>> add dissipated kinetic energy to total print("Kinetic energy
>>> dissipated: ", $ke1 - $ke2, "\n");
>>> $t1 = $d/(($v2 + $v1)/2); # time for this step by formula print("Time
>>> spent collapsing: ", $t1, "\n"); $t += $t1; # add step time to running
>>> total $rfc--; # decrement remaining floor count print("\n"); }
>>> print("Overall WTC Tower Two data -\n"); print("Total collapse time:
>>> ", $t, "\n"); print("Total energy dissipated during the collapse: ",
>>> $de, "\n"); print("Remaining kinetic energy at the end of the
>>> collapse: ", $ke2, "\n");
>>>
>>> **END PROGRAM**
>
>> if someone needs to run this program to prove to themselves that a
>> building can't collapse when 2 airliners slam into it, then i highly
>> doubt
>> they can a) manage to install perl and b) execute a perl script.
>>
>> HTH
>
> Or, you can use an online Perl emulator, if running Perl is beyond
> you. Nice tacit admission that running Perl is beyond you, BTW.
yep.. i can't figure it out. you aer so smort.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> also, has anybody here ever put a "chimney log" over a fire?
>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4nYRIMIsA>
>
>> that's kind of a mediocre one... i've gotten blue/green inner flames
>> with
>> a better sized fire and proper wood stacking underneath the chimney.
>
> Swan Band radiation of the C2 radical from pyrolysis.
how does it feel to be the dumbest smart person in the room that nobody
likes?
>
>>>> the difference in pressure at the top and bottom of a chimney-like
>>>> object in a fire seems to have some sort of "strange" effect on the
>>>> rate of
>>>> oxidation.
>
>>> Not strange except to retards who don't understand that the faster a
>>> fire gets oxygen,
>
>> ...or maybe anybody who thinks that putting a word in quotes might
>> signify
>> "nothing".
>
> It might if you'd used your quotes "properly" in context, you "moron".
> LOL
you sure seem to be "happy".
>
>> ...or who doesn't understand what a chimney even is beyond "something
>> made
>> out of bricks".
>
> You're dealing with people like Rocky and Chimpy on Usenet.
no i'm not.
> They don't
> understand much. You're not far ahead of them, DildoRider. You are,
> after all, a libtard.
can you name a few reasons to hate a liberal?
>
> <snicker>
>
>>> the faster it burns. Thanks for admitting you're one
>>> of those retards, DildoRider.
>
>> again, either irony is lost on you or you are just being intentionally
>> obtuse like a typical goof.
>
> Am I? Or am I tweaking a libtard goof because every tweak ends up with
> him doing his foot-stomping anal-retentive routine?
what you're doing is making an ass of yourself and demonstrating the
psyche of the common coward who hides behind a keyboard to spew
conservative 1% buttlicking bullshit.
>
> <snicker>
>
>> back to your socialist-like *free* education of 911konspiracyK0oks...
>> hahaha! ;)
>
> I note they're pretty quiet lately.
maybe they gave up dealing with a sociopath hiding behind a remailer.
> Even retards like that have to
> succumb to reality once it's driven home with a size 16 steel-toe
> boot.
you talk about your feet a lot, probably to distract from something else.
> I mean, look at how much good it did your sanity, DildoRider.
> Barely a trace of swish in your blather, and you're talking about TIG
> welding and campfires just like a real man.
wow. the misogyny is getting a little thick, "big man".
if you were so great you'd likely not have to put others down. you're
nothing but a swole up infant. it's no wonder that gerg idolizes you.
> Yer welcome, DildoRider.
yeah, thanks for outing yourself as a sad little lonely-in-a-crowded-room
malcontent. i'm sorry i hadn't mentioned it sooner.
>
> <snicker>
>
>>>> hmm...
>
>>> <snicker>
>
>> ^^^ you dropped something...
>
> That's OK. Tr!pey Olde Bird Buggerer (aka Steve Hall) will be around
> to snuffle it up shortly. He loves that shit.
so you have a shit-eating snicker?
>
> <snicker>
>
you might want to brush your teeth.
--
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
--
Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 14:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:26 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-11 07:10 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-12 00:16 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 21:25 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-12 22:37 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:51 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-14 23:24 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 09:16 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-16 22:47 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:04 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-19 06:35 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 20:38 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-20 09:14 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 17:56 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-14 23:23 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:13 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Julian Waldby PhD <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 07:38 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-22 09:05 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:34 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-22 10:39 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 17:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-22 23:15 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes NEMO <peeling@degenerate.Grik> - 2015-09-22 16:27 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:40 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 00:32 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Skeeter DoW #8 <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-22 09:58 -0600
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Skeeter DoW #8 <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-22 17:13 -0600
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:44 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 17:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:01 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:14 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-22 03:28 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Skeeter DoW #8 <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-14 12:45 -0600
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-14 11:56 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-15 15:31 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:20 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:36 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-12 08:02 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 04:18 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:04 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 14:10 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com - 2015-09-11 16:18 -0700
csiph-web