Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #643616

Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k)

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
Date 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <olnhkr$15ki$8@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <5639b7f1-f888-40fd-a607-42f5ed405bd7@googlegroups.com> <oln4v7$hnn$7@gioia.aioe.org> <a64a37b7-7b32-4d2d-a8fb-b4662ee4c681@googlegroups.com> <oln8a0$nrj$2@gioia.aioe.org> <4ab0dfb1-2e7a-463a-b063-d6d69c743fbb@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/31/17 7:39 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:37:25 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:40:28 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It should tell you something that the bomb did in fact work, which it
>>>>>> would not have done if E=mc^2 was wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The bomb worked because of the natural/artificial radioactivity effect.
>>>>> Which is non-destructive of matter.
>>>>> e=mcc had nothing to do with it.
>>>>> Like every mass-energy relationship, the atom bomb (just as H-bomb and matches
>>>>> and chemical bombs and solar energy and also the internal force engine) can
>>>>> be explained with the kinetically derived mass-energy relationship I discovered
>>>>> in 1999, published in Usenet in Jan 2000 and saw the light of day in the
>>>>> print world in 2003. It is 0.5mVVN(N-k).
>>>>
>>>> Then I want to see your calculated yields for a barely critical mass of
>>>> plutonium. I'm willing to bet you're going to find a factor of about a
>>>> million that you're going to need over typical chemical reaction yields.
>>>>
>>>> Put your numbers where your mouth is.
>>>
>>> In due course. It is not difficult.
>>> v is the speed of velocity addition
>>> N is the number of hits
>>> k is the efficiency factor very high for explosions that is say 1
>>> M is the averaged mass moved by the explosion
>>>
>>> One can put in the values and see how things match with nukes, chemicals
>>> and matches.
>>
>> Do it. This is the heart and soul of actually doing science -- doing these
>> calculations and quantitative comparisons.
>> Those who decline are mere pretenders.
> 
> Those who do not try on their own are cowards.

Dude, it's YOUR theory. The originator of the theory, at least in 
science, is morally obligated to perform the calculations in critical 
cases to demonstrate the viability of the theory. This is a universal 
thing. Newton did it. You are required to do it.

Those who decline to do this in support of their own ideas are not 
really scientists.

Bluster away, Arindam. You've been handed a shovel and at the moment 
you're digging yourself furiously into a hole.

>>
>>>
>>> Hint: v and N are much higher for nukes than for chemical explosions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>
>>>>> e=mcc got the credit wrongly.
>>>>> The world is very badly screwed up as a result.
>>>>> All the e=mcc frauds flourish, with their lies, and honest people have no
>>>>> power.
>>>>> Heuristics was responsible for the atom bomb.
>>>>> Intelligent monkeys fooling around, found the best way to create disaster.
>>>>> Yes they are intelligent and hard-working devils, no doubt, but theoretically
>>>>> they are WRONG.
>>>>> The atom bomb and the hydrogen bomb are the most powerful direct demonstrations
>>>>> of internal force being velocity added (as I put it) to create extraordinary
>>>>> energy as the velocity addition is happening at the nuclear level very fast
>>>>> and very powerfully.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Arindam Banerjee
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 


-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:52 -0700
  Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:33 -0700
    Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:32 -0700
      Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:40 -0700
        Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 23:05 -0700
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:21 -0700
  Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
    Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:01 -0700
      Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
        Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:39 -0700
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-31 09:51 -0700
            Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:38 -0700
              Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500

csiph-web