Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #643567
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) |
| Date | 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <oln4v7$hnn$7@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5639b7f1-f888-40fd-a607-42f5ed405bd7@googlegroups.com> |
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >> It should tell you something that the bomb did in fact work, which it >> would not have done if E=mc^2 was wrong. > > The bomb worked because of the natural/artificial radioactivity effect. > Which is non-destructive of matter. > e=mcc had nothing to do with it. > Like every mass-energy relationship, the atom bomb (just as H-bomb and matches > and chemical bombs and solar energy and also the internal force engine) can > be explained with the kinetically derived mass-energy relationship I discovered > in 1999, published in Usenet in Jan 2000 and saw the light of day in the > print world in 2003. It is 0.5mVVN(N-k). Then I want to see your calculated yields for a barely critical mass of plutonium. I'm willing to bet you're going to find a factor of about a million that you're going to need over typical chemical reaction yields. Put your numbers where your mouth is. > e=mcc got the credit wrongly. > The world is very badly screwed up as a result. > All the e=mcc frauds flourish, with their lies, and honest people have no > power. > Heuristics was responsible for the atom bomb. > Intelligent monkeys fooling around, found the best way to create disaster. > Yes they are intelligent and hard-working devils, no doubt, but theoretically > they are WRONG. > The atom bomb and the hydrogen bomb are the most powerful direct demonstrations > of internal force being velocity added (as I put it) to create extraordinary > energy as the velocity addition is happening at the nuclear level very fast > and very powerfully. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:33 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:40 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 23:05 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:21 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:01 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:39 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-31 09:51 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:38 -0700
Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500
csiph-web