Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #643615
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff |
| Date | 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <olnhkh$15ki$7@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <d69e12ce-103f-4f02-9914-a44c7e77d492@googlegroups.com> <oln4v5$hnn$4@gioia.aioe.org> <3f19a021-502a-4fb2-8ce2-d6b42aae653f@googlegroups.com> <oln8fa$o8m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <65524f05-fd3a-43b7-a4ab-cc48df42adf6@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/31/17 7:45 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:40:15 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:40:25 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Every atom is surrounded by one or more electrons. >>>>> So unless joined by valency etc. every atom should repel every other atom. >>>>> But this does not happen. In any solid of any element, the atoms are happy to >>>>> stick together. >>>> >>>> And you obviously have no idea why. Never educated about fermions I guess. >>> >>> When one holds that modern physicists cannot be trusted as they have bungled >>> with e=mcc and quantum, who wants to be educated about fermions, quarks, >>> black holes, big bang, etc. They are on the same level as fairies, unicorns, >>> goblins, gnomes, etc. in the imaginary sense but much less satisfying >>> psychologically. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee >> >> You are happy then to lift up a straw man that metals and other solids are >> a mystery not understood by physicists, because you see no point in >> studying the explanations they claim to have. > > From what I have read of your posts, they can be safely ignored, for I do not > give you any credibility whatsoever. You are blind to reason, and I am sure > they are too. Anyone who believe in the invariance of the speed of light has > to be a criminal. >> >> Arindam says: "What they claim is obviously false, and so they must be in >> fact puzzled by why solids do not blow apart, as their simple ideas must >> suggest, and so I will solve their problem by showing them how solids can >> be." >> >> Have I got all that right? > > It is impossible to debate with you and other e=mcc types for you all are > completely wrong in every way. > So I will try to make my points clear to the world that is still honest. Uh-huh. So when a criticism lands in your general vicinity, your response is to call them dishonest and criminal and declare them to be without credibility and to shut off the conversation. I see. You are SO in the wrong field if you cannot defend your thinking against criticism, or worse, acknowledge obvious mistakes. >> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Now why should they, as they all have outer electrons creating negative >>>>> charges for repulsion? >>>>> They should all be apart! >>>>> The answer I gave this morning. It is about the electron acting as a cloud >>>>> around the nucleus, and this cloud can stretch. >>>>> When it stretches, the atom becomes a dipole with the nucleus with protons on >>>>> one side and give a positive field and the electrons dense on the other side >>>>> giving a negative field. >>>>> Thus the positive side of an atom attracts the negative side of the other atom >>>>> Depending upon how strongly this is done, the material is strong. >>>>> >>>>> Okay so far? >>>>> >>>>> Now the stunning thing, if the above is accepted, is that the electrons in >>>>> general and an electron in particular is acting as a flexible RUBBER BAND. >>>>> >>>>> This picture of the electron as a rubber band is going to be useful when I >>>>> start a topic about how the hydrogen bomb works. >>>>> >>>>> The way the hydrogen bomb works is crucial to our understanding how the >>>>> uranium bomb works. >>>>> >>>>> You may think that I am going the other way around as the a bomb came before >>>>> the h bomb. Also, how the hell can I explain something which no one ever >>>>> understood. >>>>> >>>>> Ah, the glorious simplicity of all will be evident, for it results from the >>>>> mind of >>>>> >>>>> Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time, sole >>>>> god among lotsa devils. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 20:49 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 20:57 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:16 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-28 02:20 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 01:04 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 03:20 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-28 16:43 +0000
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-28 10:32 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-29 22:35 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 14:21 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:53 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:51 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-30 21:45 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-07-31 18:41 +0000
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 10:18 -0500
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 13:37 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 10:27 -0500
On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 07:54 -0700
On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-30 08:26 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:11 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:03 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:40 +0000
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:45 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 06:39 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:56 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 14:27 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 09:10 -0700
Re: On attraction between atoms, electrons as rubber bands, and powerful stuff Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
csiph-web