Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #643584

Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k)

Show all headers | View raw

Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2017 at 9:40:28 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It should tell you something that the bomb did in fact work, which it 
>>>> would not have done if E=mc^2 was wrong. 
>>> 
>>> The bomb worked because of the natural/artificial radioactivity effect. 
>>> Which is non-destructive of matter. 
>>> e=mcc had nothing to do with it. 
>>> Like every mass-energy relationship, the atom bomb (just as H-bomb and matches 
>>> and chemical bombs and solar energy and also the internal force engine) can 
>>> be explained with the kinetically derived mass-energy relationship I discovered 
>>> in 1999, published in Usenet in Jan 2000 and saw the light of day in the 
>>> print world in 2003. It is 0.5mVVN(N-k). 
>> 
>> Then I want to see your calculated yields for a barely critical mass of
>> plutonium. I'm willing to bet you're going to find a factor of about a
>> million that you're going to need over typical chemical reaction yields. 
>> 
>> Put your numbers where your mouth is. 
> 
> In due course. It is not difficult. 
> v is the speed of velocity addition
> N is the number of hits
> k is the efficiency factor very high for explosions that is say 1
> M is the averaged mass moved by the explosion
> 
> One can put in the values and see how things match with nukes, chemicals
> and matches.

Do it. This is the heart and soul of actually doing science -- doing these
calculations and quantitative comparisons. 
Those who decline are mere pretenders. 

> 
> Hint: v and N are much higher for nukes than for chemical explosions.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>> 
>>> e=mcc got the credit wrongly. 
>>> The world is very badly screwed up as a result. 
>>> All the e=mcc frauds flourish, with their lies, and honest people have no 
>>> power. 
>>> Heuristics was responsible for the atom bomb. 
>>> Intelligent monkeys fooling around, found the best way to create disaster. 
>>> Yes they are intelligent and hard-working devils, no doubt, but theoretically 
>>> they are WRONG. 
>>> The atom bomb and the hydrogen bomb are the most powerful direct demonstrations 
>>> of internal force being velocity added (as I put it) to create extraordinary 
>>> energy as the velocity addition is happening at the nuclear level very fast 
>>> and very powerfully. 
>>> 
>>> Cheers, 
>>> Arindam Banerjee 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 15:52 -0700
  Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 17:33 -0700
    Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:32 -0700
      Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 22:40 -0700
        Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-27 23:05 -0700
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 23:21 -0700
  Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 11:40 +0000
    Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:01 -0700
      Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 12:37 +0000
        Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 05:39 -0700
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 10:16 -0500
          Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-07-31 09:51 -0700
            Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-07-31 18:38 -0700
              Re: Nuclear bombs as the greatest demonstration of internal force and easily explained with the kinetic mass energy relationship e=0.5mVVN(N-k) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-02 11:00 -0500

csiph-web