Groups > sci.electronics.design > #447444

Re: experts aren't

From	Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: experts aren't
Date	2017-02-12 19:44 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<o7qduo$tmj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<60nu9c916reeui8gbsj3ddinq2nsok98e5@4ax.com> <o7o51c$7vm$1@dont-email.me> <3958d2e2-9743-4264-bbc2-031d9e7ecec5@googlegroups.com> <o7pvel$1r7$2@dont-email.me> <td31acl4cn2na9oblf1pv4uim669ijuvgv@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 08:36:25 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

> That is one, of very many, points that Taleb makes in his book: reading
> newspapers can make you less informed. Today's San Francisco Chronicle
> is atrocious.

Likewise with the (London) Times and the Wall Street Journal. Wonderfully 
informative, impartial and serious newspapers deserving of great respect 
and authority - until Murdoch got hold of them, that is. There doesn't 
seem to be anything he won't turn into a populist, lower-class mouthpiece 
for himself and his business interests.

> Sloman is increasingly ossified in his ritual third-person insult mode,
> with rare but repeated references to unsuccessful 1970's electronic
> designs. Refresh that killfile entry.

Wise counsel I'm sure. But just out of curiosity as to how long it will 
take, I'm going to wait until he writes something outrageously 
unpalatable. I'm guessing I won't have to wait very long. At all.

Thread

experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 10:59 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 19:14 +0000
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 11:28 -0800
      Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:07 -0500
        Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:53 -0500
      Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-11 15:08 -0800
        Re: experts aren't djlocher56@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 14:21 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:16 -0800
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:20 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 12:50 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-13 13:51 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-13 08:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 17:16 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 06:47 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-11 23:37 +0000
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:49 -0800
      Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 17:19 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-11 17:39 -0500
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 16:36 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:27 -0500
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 10:52 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:30 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:28 +0000
          Re: experts aren't Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-02-12 11:44 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:05 -0500
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:25 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:39 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:23 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 12:40 -0500
  Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-11 22:59 +0000
    Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:17 -0500
    Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-11 18:54 -0500
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 17:05 -0800
      Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-11 17:09 -0800
        Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:33 -0500
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 18:32 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 20:50 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:11 -0500
          Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:22 -0500
          Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:32 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:44 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 15:47 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 13:11 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-02-12 16:34 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:10 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 16:57 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:58 -0800
      Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:36 +0000
        Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 08:36 -0800
          Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 19:44 +0000
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 12:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 23:43 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 19:24 -0500
                Re: experts aren't Julian Barnes <jb9889@notformail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:53 +0000
                Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-12 20:18 -0500
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-12 17:27 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:28 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:26 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:29 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 17:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-02-11 18:02 -0500
  Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-11 16:43 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2017-02-11 21:42 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:19 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:45 -0800
        Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-12 15:44 +0000
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:16 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:42 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:39 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:02 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:38 -0800
        Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 18:54 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:45 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:52 -0800
  Re: experts aren't bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 00:13 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:23 -0800
  Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 03:56 -0800
    Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 04:33 -0800
      Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-12 04:46 -0800
        Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-12 18:49 -0800
          Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-13 01:41 -0800
            Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-13 07:55 -0800
              Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 01:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 03:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-14 22:22 +0000
                Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 14:48 -0800
                Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-14 17:09 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:22 -0800
                Re: experts aren't whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-14 17:56 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-02-15 18:05 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 19:21 -0800
                Re: experts aren't "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-02-18 21:41 -0500
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 19:05 -0800
  Re: experts aren't Martin Brown <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-02-14 10:40 +0000
    Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-14 03:42 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 04:14 -0800
        Re: experts aren't jurb6006@gmail.com - 2017-02-15 08:56 -0800
          Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 10:35 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-15 10:46 -0800
              Re: experts aren't George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2017-02-15 11:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 12:18 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:51 -0800
                Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:26 -0800
            Re: experts aren't krw@notreal.com - 2017-02-15 20:59 -0500
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 20:01 -0800
          Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 15:43 -0800
            Re: experts aren't John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-02-15 16:38 -0800
              Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-15 19:38 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:25 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-17 21:47 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 12:49 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 05:13 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-18 22:39 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 18:12 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-18 11:43 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-18 17:52 -0800
            Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-17 21:17 +0000
              Re: experts aren't M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2017-02-18 16:46 -0500
              Re: experts aren't Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-02-19 05:35 +0000
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 02:15 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 03:28 -0800
                Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-19 03:31 -0800
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 09:23 -0800
                Re: experts aren't Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> - 2017-02-20 00:31 +0000
                Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-19 17:31 -0800
        Re: experts aren't tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-02-17 13:43 -0800
    Re: experts aren't John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-02-14 07:08 -0800
      Re: experts aren't bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-02-14 20:07 -0800

csiph-web